Lowering Healthcare Costs for Government, Businesses and Households
WASHINGTON — National Health Care Expenditures in the United States continue to grow at rates outpacing the broader economy. But there isn’t just broad agreement among the public and policymakers that healthcare is unaffordable. Many argue that patients aren’t even getting sufficient value for what they are spending.
The Health Savers Initiative, a collaborative project of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, Arnold Ventures, and West Health, has been working to identify concrete policy proposals to make health care more affordable for the federal government, businesses, and households.
At a recent virtual event, the Initiative released three distinct opportunities that could make a meaningful impact on national health care cost, because as Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., explained in a video address from the discussion, “Our country spends too much, and it doesn’t spend it in the right places.”
“What we’re really trying to do is take ideas from the think tank community or health policy researchers and try and translate them and talk about them on the Hill… and try and put scores on these options [beyond the budgetary impact, which is done by CBO]… to capture a holistic view on some options that can save money not just for the federal government, but for commercial insurance, businesses, and for individuals,” said Josh Gordon, director of Health Policy at CRFB.
The three options put forth as strong candidates for lowering healthcare costs were Equalizing Medicare Payments Regardless of Site-of-Care, Reducing Medicare Advantage Overpayments, and Capping Hospital Prices.
“Moving to site-neutral payments in Medicare… was a bipartisan idea. Both Presidents Obama and Trump had this idea in their budget submissions,” said Gordon, who offered that paying different amounts for the same service just because of where it happens, “doesn’t make sense.”
Currently, the Medicare program pays higher rates for medical services performed in hospital outpatient departments than it pays for the same services when they are performed at physicians’ offices or Ambulatory Surgical Centers. This payment disparity has increased consolidation in the health care market.
Site-neutral payment reform would not only translate to lower premiums and cost-sharing, but it could also generate savings in other parts of the health system. For example, by reducing payment rates for hospital outpatient departments, there would be less incentive for hospitals to purchase and convert physician practices to take advantage of the payment disparity, which has led to higher private sector prices.
The Health Savers Initiative suggests that site-neutral reform could reduce Medicare spending by $153 billion and potentially reduce the federal budget deficit by as much as $279 billion.
A second suggestion was to overturn the “perverse incentive” [Gordon] that results from private plans in Medicare Advantage being paid more based on the number of enrollee diagnoses, or codes, given to each patient. Coding frequently and intensely makes patients look sicker and results in overpayments in the Medicare Advantage Program.
“Fee-for-service Medicare doesn’t have the same incentives,” said Gordon.
The Health Savers Initiative believes that addressing the problem of coding intensity would not only improve the solvency of the Medicare trust fund which is set to run out of money in 2026 but also reduce the federal budget deficit by up to $327 billion.
The final suggestion was to put a cap on the prices hospitals can charge. This is different from price-setting, said Michael Chernew, a health economist at Harvard University, because it “allows the market to work [with the option to] step in as a backstop when you think markets aren’t working well.”
The Health Savers Initiative proposed that capping commercial prices at twice that of the Medicare rate could address high prices and combat the effects of excess hospital market power. It also estimates that this could reduce the federal budget deficit by $216 billion.
“A lot of this sometimes feels like we’re bashing hospitals,” said Chernew. “Hospitals are important. We need to support a viable high-quality hospital system.” But the cost of hospital care accounts for one-third of all U.S. health care expenditures, so he said price-capping could “get rid of the most egregious problems.”
“We’re looking for options that can really capture some market failures or inefficiencies… and try and make health policy a little bit more sane,” said Gordon. “Saving in health care is hard and that’s one of the reasons we haven’t done it… but high health care costs hurt individual Americans, businesses, and the deficit.”
In The News
WASHINGTON — To keep up with technological advancements and provide for enhanced national security, the National Security Commission on Artificial... Read More
WASHINGTON — To keep up with technological advancements and provide for enhanced national security, the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence was created. Its purpose was to make recommendations to the president and Congress that would “advance the development of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and associated... Read More
WASHINGTON — One year ago the United States, UAE, and Bahrain signed a historic agreement and charted a new course... Read More
WASHINGTON — One year ago the United States, UAE, and Bahrain signed a historic agreement and charted a new course in Arab-Israeli relations which recognized the state of Israel and normalized diplomatic relations between the countries. But the desire for a two-state solution recognizing both Israel... Read More
WASHINGTON — After a frantic two weeks of the biggest military evacuations in history, the United States is trying to... Read More
WASHINGTON — After a frantic two weeks of the biggest military evacuations in history, the United States is trying to figure out what to do with tens of thousands of Afghan refugees that will soon be flooding into the country. “This is not the time for... Read More
WASHINGTON -- President Joe Biden’s controversial executive order on competition was the topic being discussed at a Federalist Society event... Read More
WASHINGTON -- President Joe Biden’s controversial executive order on competition was the topic being discussed at a Federalist Society event held Thursday. The July 9 Executive Order 14036 entitled, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” seeks to address competition issues and reform the antitrust laws governing... Read More
Jake Harriman, a veteran Marine who was deployed abroad for almost 15 years, did not recognize the country he left... Read More
Jake Harriman, a veteran Marine who was deployed abroad for almost 15 years, did not recognize the country he left to fight for when he returned to the U.S. in 2015. During two combat tours in Iraq, the now CEO and founder of More Perfect Union,... Read More
WASHINGTON -- The Senate has passed both the $1.5 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill and the framework of the $3.5 trillion... Read More
WASHINGTON -- The Senate has passed both the $1.5 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill and the framework of the $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation bill made up largely of potential investments in social programs and climate policy. While these massive budgetary items move through the House, Democrats continue... Read More