Texas Sues to Invalidate Election Outcome in Four Battleground States

December 8, 2020 by Dan McCue
Texas Sues to Invalidate Election Outcome in Four Battleground States
Outside the U.S. Supreme Court building. (Photo by Dan McCue)

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to invalidate the presidential election results in four key battleground states citing “unconstitutional irregularities” he says helped Joe Biden prevail over President Donald Trump.

In a 154-page complaint, Paxton argues that Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin — all states Biden won — used the coronavirus pandemic as an excuse to unlawfully change their election rules, “weakening ballot integrity.”

He’s asking the High Court to declare that any electoral college votes cast by presidential electors appointed in these four states are being made in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment and therefore cannot be counted.

In addition, he’s asking the justices to enjoin the states from using the 2020 election results to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College. Instead, he wants the court to direct the state legislatures in each of the four states to appoint a new set of electors.

Alternative remedies suggested in the complaint include having each of the four states hold a special election to choose presidential electors or for them to appoint no presidential electors at all.

The lawsuit against the four states coincides with an important deadline in the election certification process, known as the “safe harbor” threshold, after which Congress is compelled to accept states’ certified results.

Six days later, electors in the Electoral College will cast their votes, finalizing Biden’s win. The suit is also asking the Supreme Court to extend that Dec. 14 deadline “to allow these investigations to be completed.”

In a separate development, the Trump re-election campaign also addressed the “safe harbor” deadlines Tuesday, describing it as a ” statutory timeline that generally denotes the last day for states to certify election results.”

“However,” the campaign said, “it is not unprecedented for election contests to last well beyond December 8.”

In a joint statement, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, as President Trump’s attorney, and Jenna Ellis, in her role as the Trump campaign’s senior legal advisor, note that “Justice Ginsburg recognized in Bush v. Gore that the date of ‘ultimate significance’ is January 6, when Congress counts and certifies the votes of the Electoral College.

“The only fixed day in the U.S. Constitution is the inauguration of the President on January 20 at noon,” Guiliani and Ellis say. “Despite the media trying desperately to proclaim that the fight is over, we will continue to champion election integrity until every legal vote is counted fairly and accurately.”

The lawsuit was filed directly with the Supreme Court because it has exclusive jurisdiction over legal disputes among states.

Paxton also argued that the high court is the only one equipped to handle such a case over the Electoral College.

A+
a-
  • Electoral College
  • Supreme Court
  • Texas
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    April 25, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Loud, Raucous Crowd Gathers Outside Supreme Court, but MAGA Hard to Find

    WASHINGTON — They banged on pots. They banged on pans. They raised their voices and even jingled a few tambourines. ... Read More

    WASHINGTON — They banged on pots. They banged on pans. They raised their voices and even jingled a few tambourines.  All in the hope of making their opinions plain to the nine justices assembled inside to hear the most consequential and final case of the current... Read More

    April 25, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Cautious Over Claims of Absolute Immunity for Trump

    WASHINGTON — Comments from Supreme Court justices Thursday indicated former President Donald Trump is likely to face criminal and civil... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Comments from Supreme Court justices Thursday indicated former President Donald Trump is likely to face criminal and civil charges despite his claim of immunity while he was president. Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election led to felony charges against him that include... Read More

    April 16, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Divided on Law for Prosecuting Jan. 6 Rioters

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether to throw out criminal charges of obstructing an official... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether to throw out criminal charges of obstructing an official proceeding against Jan. 6 defendants, including former President Donald Trump. About 350 persons who invaded the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection have been charged... Read More

    Five Takeaways From the Abortion Pill Case Before US Supreme Court

    WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday did not appear ready to limit access to the abortion pill mifepristone,... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday did not appear ready to limit access to the abortion pill mifepristone, in a case that could have far-reaching implications for millions of American women and for scores of drugs regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. It's... Read More

    March 26, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Skeptical of Ban on Abortion Pill Mifepristone

    WASHINGTON — A hearing Tuesday before the Supreme Court indicated a majority of the justices want to maintain women’s access... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A hearing Tuesday before the Supreme Court indicated a majority of the justices want to maintain women’s access to the abortion pill mifepristone despite objections from anti-abortion activists. The doctors and organizations who sued argued the Food and Drug Administration was wrong in granting... Read More

    March 19, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Gives Texas Green Light to Deport Illegal Immigrants

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to begin enforcing a state law that effectively allows officials... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to begin enforcing a state law that effectively allows officials to deport undocumented immigrants, despite objections from the Biden administration, which argued only the federal government has authority over immigration issues. In an unsigned order, the... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top