Supreme Court’s First-Ever Sitting for Arguments By Phone Goes Off Without a Hitch

May 5, 2020 by Dan McCue
Attorney Erica Ross poses for a portrait, Monday, May 4, 2020, outside the Department of Justice in Washington, after Ross became the first attorney to argue in the first arguments that the Supreme Court has argued via telephone. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

WASHINGTON – Somewhere, Alexander Graham Bell must be smiling.

Some 144 years after the Scottish-born scientist invented the world’s first working telephone, the U.S. Supreme Court made history Monday by hearing oral arguments using his technology and allowing the world to listen in.

The justices haven’t been idle since postponing arguments in 20 cases scheduled for March and April due to the coronavirus. They’ve continued to hold their Friday conference meetings to consider new cases for their docket, and they’ve issued a smattering of decisions.

But actual courtroom sessions are still considered unsafe in the face of the pandemic, especially as six of the nine justices are aged 65 or older and risk becoming seriously ill if they get the virus.

To continue to fully function as a court, the justices ultimately decided to hear 10 cases by phone over six days this month.

Monday’s case concerned whether Booking.com can trademark its name. Justice Department attorney Erica Ross argued Booking.com should not be allowed to trademark its name because it is a generic term followed by “.com.”

Among the other cases the court will hear during this extraordinary series of hearings are President Donald Trump’s effort to shield tax and other financial records and one asking whether presidential electors have to cast their Electoral College ballots for the candidate who wins the popular vote in their state.

The session went smoothly, notable for a high court that prizes tradition and only reluctantly changes the way it operates.

In fact, in most ways, Monday’s session departed little from arguments held in the Supreme Court chamber.

It began at the usual time, 10 a.m. eastern daylight time, with Marshal Pamela Talkin calling the court to order.

“Oyez, oyez, oyez,” she said. “All persons having business before the honorable Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to give their attention for the court is now sitting … God save the United States and this honorable court.”

With that, Chief Justice John Roberts banged his gavel and announced the case.

“We’ll hear arguments this morning in case 1946, “United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com. Miss Ross. …” he said introducing the government’s attorney.

“Mr. Chief Justice and may it please the court,” she said, uttering the attorney’s traditional opening.

With that, the hearing boiled down to an orderly phone discussion among the nine justices and two arguing lawyers.

The one difference between a traditional hearing before the court and Monday’s proceedings was that rather than engage in their usual, rapid-fire, free-for-all style of questioning, the justices quizzed the attorneys by order of seniority.

That meant that after Roberts asked the first questions of Ross, Justice Clarence Thomas came next, followed by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and on down to Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who went last.

The biggest surprise of the day was Thomas, who once went 10 years without posing a question in a case, and who has said in the past that he often thinks his colleagues ask lawyers too many questions.

On Monday, Thomas posed questions to both attorneys. It was the first time in more than a year that he asked a question.

Thomas last posed a query in a Mississippi death penalty case in March 2019.

The justice has explained his silence as being a byproduct of his childhood experience as the only black student in a virtually all-white school and being made fun of for his way of speaking, which adheres to a black dialect spoken primarily in coastal Georgia and South Carolina.

“I was thinking in standard English but speaking another language so I just started developing the habit of listening,” he told an interviewer two decades ago.

Glitches during Monday’s hearing were few and minor. At one point, when the questioning was passed to Justice Sonia Sotomayor, there was a long pause when she evidently had her microphone on mute.

The chief justice called on her a second time, at which point, Sotomayor appeared on the line.

“I’m sorry, chief,” she said before beginning her questioning.

At another point, Justice Stephen Breyer could be heard, but his audio was briefly garbled.

Throughout the proceedings, Roberts politely interrupted the arguing attorneys to keep the questioning on schedule, saying “thank you, counsel,” when it was time to move on to the next justice.

Despite his best efforts, the case still ran about 15 minutes over its allotted hour.

“It is a fundamental principle of trademark law that no party can obtain a trademark for a generic term like ‘wine,’ ‘cotton,’ or ‘grain,'” Ross told the justices, pointing them to an 1888 Supreme Court case involving the Goodyear Rubber Co., in which the justices ruled that adding a word like “Company” or “Inc.” to a generic term doesn’t make it eligible to be trademarked.

The other attorney arguing before the court was Lisa Blatt, of Williams & Connolly LLP, representing Booking.com in its fight for trademark registration.

She was the only participant in the call to reference the global pandemic that prompted the extraordinary hearing in the first place.

“Sometimes people think of generic-word.coms generically. I have searched every grocery-store.com looking for toilet paper,” she said. “I have now started looking at every hardware.com. I am using food-delivery.com for all of my take-outs these days. Those are generic usages of a generic-word.com.”

The chief justice did not address the novelty of the teleconference Monday, ending with his usual line, “Thank you counsel, the case is submitted.”

The Supreme Court will hear an additional nine arguments before the May teleconference session ends on May 13.

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Deals Blow to Trump
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Deals Blow to Trump
February 22, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected an effort by former President Donald Trump to shield his income tax records from N.Y. prosecutors. The court’s action is the apparent culmination of a lengthy legal battle that had already reached the high court once before.... Read More

Biden Administration Asks Supreme Court to Uphold ACA
Supreme Court
Biden Administration Asks Supreme Court to Uphold ACA
February 11, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The White House on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court it believes the Affordable Care Act should be upheld, reversing the position taken by the Trump Administration. The justices heard oral arguments in November in multiple cases involving a group of Republican-led states attempting to... Read More

Supreme Court Tosses Emoluments Lawsuits Against Trump, Calling Them Moot
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Tosses Emoluments Lawsuits Against Trump, Calling Them Moot
January 25, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a pair of emoluments lawsuits against former President Donald Trump, ruling the cases are moot now that he's left office. The lawsuits were filed by the attorneys general for Maryland and Washington, D.C., and the government watchdog, Citizens... Read More

Supreme Court Allows Government to Enforce Abortion Pill Rule
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government to Enforce Abortion Pill Rule
January 13, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court lifted a nationwide injunction Tuesday that had prevented the federal government from enforcing a rule that required women to see a health care professional in person before she'd be given access to a so-called abortion pill. The Food and Drug... Read More

Supreme Court Rules Challenge to Trump Census Plan is Premature
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Rules Challenge to Trump Census Plan is Premature
December 18, 2020
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a challenge to President Donald Trump's plan to exclude people living in the country illegally from the population count as premature. Trump's insistence that illegal immigrants be excluded from the count could profoundly impact the number of seats... Read More

Supreme Court to Decide Whether NCAA Can Refuse Pay for Football and Basketball Stars
Sports
Supreme Court to Decide Whether NCAA Can Refuse Pay for Football and Basketball Stars

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Wednesday to decide whether major colleges and universities are violating federal antitrust laws by refusing to pay the football and basketball players who bring in hundreds of millions of dollars to their campuses. The National Collegiate Athletic Association and several... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top