Supreme Court Declines to Hear Emoluments Case Against Trump
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to revive a lawsuit filed by members of Congress that accused President Donald Trump of illegally profiting from his presidency.
As is their custom the justices did not explain why they were rejecting the case, including it in its latest “Certiorari Denied” among scores of other, less high-profile cases.
The decision means the earlier dismissal by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit of the lawsuit filed by 215 members of Congress will stand.
The suit claimed the president has flouted the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause since he took office. The clause prohibits self-dealing by federal officeholders.
In a unanimous, unsigned decision, the appeals court said the individual members of Congress simply didn’t have legal standing to take the president to court.
“The members can, and likely will, continue to use their weighty voices to make their case to the American people, their colleagues in the Congress and the president himself, all of whom are free to engage that argument as they see fit,” that ruling said.
“But we will not — indeed we cannot — participate in this debate,” the panel said.
Trump still faces a number of other lawsuits alleging he violated the emoluments clause of the Constitution by accepting payments from foreign and domestic officials who stay at the Trump International Hotel.
In May, a federal appeals court in Virginia reinstated a lawsuit brought by the state of Maryland and the District of Columbia.
A similar lawsuit brought by restaurant workers and a prominent restaurateur and hotelier has also been given the green light to continue.
In The News
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court has rejected a Republican candidate's attempt to delay the vote in a high-profile congressional race in Minnesota following the unexpected death of a third-party candidate. The date of the vote in Minnesota's Second Congressional District was thrown into question in September,... Read More
WASHINGTON — A dizzying array of U.S. Supreme Court orders and opinions over the past 10 days has left the rules governing next week's presidential election in flux. In rapid succession, the court has allowed extra time for mail-in ballots to arrive in Pennsylvania and North Carolina, but rejected calls for a... Read More
WASHINGTON — Newly confirmed U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett will immediately be embroiled in some of the nation's biggest legal battles, including cases that could determine whether the president who nominated her gets four more years in the White House. The 48-year-old Barrett, who takes her seat just a week... Read More
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Senate confirmed Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court Monday evening, marking the first time in 151 years that a justice was confirmed without the support of a single member of the minority party. Shortly afterward, President Donald Trump held a swearing-in... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday refused to extend the Election Day deadline for mail ballots in Wisconsin, rejecting appeals from Democrats who said the Postal Service may not be able handle the flood of election mail by Nov. 3. The justices by a 5-3 vote left in place a ruling by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court in Chicago that... Read More
WASHINGTON — A sharply divided Senate dispensed with a key procedural hurdle Sunday on the Supreme Court nomination of Amy Coney Barrett, as Republicans race to a final confirmation vote Monday that will solidify the high court's conservative tilt. In a rare weekend floor vote mostly along party lines, 51-48, Republicans backed President Donald Trump's pick of the... Read More