Justices Uphold California Ban on Sale of Pork From Confined Sows

May 11, 2023 by Dan McCue
Justices Uphold California Ban on Sale of Pork From Confined Sows
(Photo by pixelmixer via Pixabay)

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a California ballot initiative that barred the sale of pork produced in other states unless the sow was housed in humane conditions allowing for free movement.

The decision of the court was 5-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting.

At issue in the case was a California law known as Proposition 12, which bans the in-state sale of whole pork meat that comes from breeding pigs (or their immediate offspring) that are “confined in a cruel manner.”

The law further defines “cruel” to mean in ways that prevent a pig from lying down, standing up, fully extending its limbs or freely turning around.

Prior to the vote, animal rights activists argued the law would benefit both animal welfare and consumer health.

After Proposition 12’s adoption two industry organizations, the National Pork Producers Council and the American Farm Bureau Federation, sued on behalf of their members, maintaining Proposition 12 violated the Constitution by impermissibly burdening interstate commerce.

The organizations went on to argue that the cost of compliance with Proposition 12 would increase production costs and would fall on both California and out-of-state producers.  

They further argued that because California imports almost all the pork it consumes, most of Proposition 12’s compliance costs would be borne by out-of-state firms.  

A federal judge tossed the case, finding that the plaintiffs had failed to state a valid claim as a matter of law. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later affirmed that decision.

Writing for the Supreme Court majority, Justice Neil Gorsuch observed that “[c]ompanies that choose to sell products in various states must normally comply with the laws of those various states.”  

“Assuredly, under this court’s dormant commerce clause decisions, no state may use its laws to discriminate purposefully against out-of-state economic interests,” he continued. “But the pork producers do not suggest that California’s law offends this principle. Instead, they invite us to fashion two new and more aggressive constitutional restrictions on the ability of states to regulate goods sold within their borders. 

“We decline that invitation. While the Constitution addresses many weighty issues, the type of pork chops California merchants may sell is not on that list,” Gorsuch said.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and at https://twitter.com/DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • California
  • pigs
  • pork
  • Proposition 12
  • Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    July 14, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Green-Lights Dismantling of Education Department

    WASHINGTON — In a major victory for the Trump administration, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the White House... Read More

    WASHINGTON — In a major victory for the Trump administration, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the White House can move forward with plans to lay off nearly 1,400 employees at the Department of Education. As is their custom in dispensing with emergency orders, the... Read More

    July 8, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Lifts Stay on Trump Effort to Slash Federal Workforce

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted a lower court’s order that had prevented the Trump administration from moving... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted a lower court’s order that had prevented the Trump administration from moving forward with planned mass layoffs and the dismantling of a number of federal agencies. In its unsigned ruling, the court said an executive order signed by... Read More

    July 3, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court to Decide Liability of Transit Agencies After Accidents

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to determine whether New Jersey Transit is immune from liability as a state... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to determine whether New Jersey Transit is immune from liability as a state agency. The public transit agency was sued by two men who were hit and injured by commuter buses in separate accidents. In one case of a... Read More

    July 3, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Justices to Take Up Two Transgender Athlete Cases Next Term

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court announced Thursday that it will hear two cases challenging the constitutionality of state laws that... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court announced Thursday that it will hear two cases challenging the constitutionality of state laws that bar transgender athletes from girls’ and women’s sports teams. The two cases come to the court from Idaho and West Virginia. Just last month, a sharply... Read More

    July 1, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court to Review $1B Cox Digital Copyright Case

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide a copyright dispute between Cox Communications and major music labels... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide a copyright dispute between Cox Communications and major music labels that could set the stage for a landmark decision on copyright infringement liability in the digital era. The case is Cox Communications, Inc., et al. v.... Read More

    July 1, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Agrees to Rehear Case Seeking End to Campaign Finance Limits

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a lawsuit during its next term that seeks to end some... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a lawsuit during its next term that seeks to end some restrictions on campaign spending by political parties. The limits were imposed during the Nixon administration to prevent political parties from coordinating efforts with candidates on how... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top