Justices Opt to Stay Out of Climate Change Suit Forum Fight

April 24, 2023 by Dan McCue
Justices Opt to Stay Out of Climate Change Suit Forum Fight
The U.S. Supreme Court building. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday refused to consider a series of legal cases raising the question of whether climate change suits brought by state and local governments against fossil fuel companies ought to be heard in federal court.

The justices’ decision to stay clear of the controversy means dozens of these lawsuits will now proceed in state and local courts, which are typically perceived as advantageous for plaintiffs.

Several of the underlying lawsuits come from California, where local municipalities sued more than 30 energy companies in state court alleging their production and marketing of fossil fuels contribute to global warming.

In each of the lawsuits, the municipalities claim the oil and gas companies failed to warn about the risks of climate change and should be forced to cover the climate-change costs the local governments face, such as infrastructure repair due to rising sea levels.

The companies responded by arguing the lawsuits should be thrown out because the municipalities chose to file them in the wrong venue.

According to the oil and gas firm defendants, among them BP and Shell, energy production is an inherently federal issue, and lawsuits related to it should be exclusively heard in federal court.

In addition, they argued that the greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming cross state and international lines and therefore cannot be adequately addressed under state laws.

Though several lower courts have already rejected these arguments, the Supreme Court last year gave the companies a second chance to argue for removal of the cases to federal court.

Its May 2021 decision pertained to a case filed by the city of Baltimore, Maryland, that made many of the same arguments as the West Coast cases, namely that it was vulnerable to sea-level rise and flooding driven by climate change and that through their actions, the oil companies made it worse.

The 7-1 ruling in favor of BP, Chevron, Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell PLC and other energy companies, was based on a technicality concerning limits on appeal courts to remand cases to state court.

The opinion, written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, opened the door to the renewed challenge that came up short on Monday.

As is their custom, the justices did not explain the rationale for their decision.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and at https://twitter.com/DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • climate change
  • Energy
  • fossil fuels
  • oil and gas companies
  • Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    Supreme Court Takes Up Religious Rights Dispute Over LGBTQ Books in Maryland Schools

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing arguments Tuesday over the religious rights of parents in Maryland to remove their... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing arguments Tuesday over the religious rights of parents in Maryland to remove their children from elementary school classes using storybooks with LGBTQ characters. The case is the latest dispute involving religion to come before the conservative-led court. The justices have... Read More

    April 21, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Skeptical of Overriding Preventive Medical Tests in Obamacare

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is trying to decide whether to keep an Affordable Care Act provision that requires insurers... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is trying to decide whether to keep an Affordable Care Act provision that requires insurers to offer no-cost preventive care tests. The court heard arguments Monday on whether the procedure for deciding which tests can be included under the national insurance... Read More

    Supreme Court Says Trump Administration Must Work to Bring Back Mistakenly Deported Maryland Man

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday said the Trump administration must work to bring back a Maryland man who was... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday said the Trump administration must work to bring back a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to prison in El Salvador, rejecting the administration’s emergency appeal. The court acted in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran citizen who had... Read More

    Supreme Court Takes Up $8B Phone and Internet Subsidy

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court hears arguments Wednesday in a major legal fight over the $8 billion a year the federal... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court hears arguments Wednesday in a major legal fight over the $8 billion a year the federal government spends to subsidize phone and internet services in schools, libraries and rural areas, in a new test of federal regulatory power. The justices are reviewing an appellate ruling that... Read More

    March 24, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Rejects Children’s Lawsuit Seeking Injunction Against Climate Change

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to revive a lawsuit on behalf of children who said U.S.... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to revive a lawsuit on behalf of children who said U.S. energy policies that exacerbate climate change are damaging their futures. They said unrestrained climate change jeopardized their life, liberty, personal security and health. The 9th Circuit... Read More

    March 21, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Set to Hear Two Major Cases Next Week

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is set to hear two of the major cases in its current term next week;... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is set to hear two of the major cases in its current term next week; one that will take a closer look at racial gerrymandering in Louisiana, the other considering federal court jurisdiction over Clean Air Act cases. The first hearing,... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top