Judiciary Panel Advances Barrett Nomination Over Dem Boycott
WASHINGTON – The GOP-led Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday voted to advance the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the full Senate, despite a Democratic boycott on the hearing.
The 12-0 vote by the committee virtually assures Barrett will be confirmed to the high court early next week, barring some unforeseen circumstance. Senators plan to convene a rare weekend session ahead of a final confirmation vote expected Monday.
The committee vote advanced President Donald Trump’s goal of having Barrett confirmed before Election Day in case the justices need to weigh in on the election results, as they did in 2000.
Last week, the absence of a tiebreaker on the Supreme Court let stand a ruling by Pennsylvania’s highest court allowing election officials in Pennsylvania to count some mailed ballots received up to three days after Election Day.
On Thursday morning, Democratic senators refused to show up at the Judiciary Committee hearing in protest of the GOP’s rush to install Trump’s nominee to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Instead of attending, the Democrats displayed posters at their desks of Americans they say have benefited from the Affordable Care Act now being challenged in court.
“We should not be moving forward on this nomination,” Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said Wednesday in announcing the boycott. He called Barrett’s views “so far out of the mainstream.”
Never has the Senate confirmed a Supreme Court nominee so close to a presidential election.
After the Republicans voted unanimously in favor of Barrett, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the panel’s chairman declared the majority’s action “a groundbreaking, historic moment.”
“We did it. We did it. Judge Barrett is going to the floor,” he added.
The 48-year-old federal judge’s ascent to the high court would lock a 6-3 conservative majority on the court for the foreseeable future.
Outside the Supreme Court on Thursday protestors denounced the committee’s vote.
With Republicans holding a 53-47 majority in the Senate, Trump’s pick for the court is almost certain to be confirmed. All Democrats are expected to oppose Barrett’s confirmation.
In The News
WASHINGTON — Should a federal law that protects National Guard members and reservists from being fired from their private sector jobs while they are deployed also apply to state government jobs? Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court hinted it might weigh in on the issue. The U.S. Supreme Court last Tuesday requested... Read More
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's plan to exclude millions of immigrants in the country illegally from the 2020 census count appeared to fizzle at the Supreme Court on Monday. California officials feared that Trump's policy, if put into effect in the last weeks of his presidency, could not only diminish the state's... Read More
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump, even while repeating his groundless claim that "we won the race," appeared Sunday to acknowledge dwindling chances of success in his legal battle to overturn the results of the Nov. 3 election won by President-elect Joe Biden. "It's hard to get into the Supreme Court," he said... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — As coronavirus cases surge again nationwide the Supreme Court late Wednesday barred New York from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues in areas designated as hard hit by the virus. The justices split 5-4 with new Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the... Read More
WASHINGTON - Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., told the Federalist Society in a keynote address Thursday night the coronavirus pandemic has led to "previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty." "I am not diminishing the severity of the virus's threat to public health," Alito continued in a... Read More
WASHINGTON -- So much for the new conservative majority of the Supreme Court dismantling the Affordable Care Act. On Tuesday, during oral arguments for California v. Texas, one of this term's most anticipated cases, two members of that majority, suggested they're not inclined to strike down... Read More