High Court to Decide When Officials Can Block People on Social Media

April 24, 2023 by Dan McCue
High Court to Decide When Officials Can Block People on Social Media
Detail of the U.S. Supreme Court building. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to determine whether the First Amendment protects social media users from being blocked on the personal pages of government officials.

Today’s decision consolidates two cases, one a lawsuit brought against two members of the Poway Unified School District Board of Trustees in southern California, and the other, a suit filed against the city manager of Port Huron, Michigan.

Whatever the justices ultimately decide, the ruling is expected to have sweeping implications in a society where elected officials at all levels of government are increasingly using social media to interact with voters and constituents.

The underlying California lawsuit was filed by Christopher and Kimberly Garnier, parents of students in the Poway Unified School District, who were blocked by school board members Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff and T.J. Zane in 2017.

In both instances, the Garniers were blocked on the board members’ Facebook page, and O’Connor-Ratcliff also blocked the couple from responding to her Twitter posts.

There was nothing obscene or threatening about the posts, but they were lengthy and highly repetitive.

The Garniers testified in a lower court hearing that they repeated comments because they wanted to reach other Facebook users who might only look at one particular post.

“By repeating their message on each post, plaintiffs reasoned, they would raise the issues that mattered to them involving PUSD to a broader audience,” the judge hearing the case wrote.

That judge, presiding in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, later found in the Garniers’ favor. 

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later upheld that ruling, holding the officials were using their pages in their official capacities and that in such cases social media accounts are essentially public forums. 

The three-judge panel also rejected the school board members’ arguments that their social media pages were not “official channels” through which members of the public were expected to communicate with them.

The underlying Michigan case arose during the coronavirus pandemic. At the time — March 2020 — City Manager James Freed posted information on his Facebook page describing efforts Port Huron was taking to deal with the public health crisis.

When a local resident, Kevin Lindke, posted comments on the page criticizing the city’s response, Freed blocked him.

Throughout the litigation, Freed argued that his Facebook page wasn’t an extension of his public life, but rather a personal page on which he shared family pictures and commented on his daily activities.

The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ultimately agreed with Freed and concluded that since he was not acting in his official capacity, the act of blocking Lindke did not constitute a state action that could be litigated.

This is the second time the Supreme Court will consider this question, though the first time was something of a wash that left the central legal question unresolved.

In 2021, the Supreme Court threw out a similar lawsuit brought against former President Donald Trump, holding the question had been rendered moot by his leaving office, with the fact that Twitter had subsequently banned him from the platform being a contributing factor.

New Twitter owner Elon Musk has since reinstated Trump’s account, though the former president appears to be sticking with his own “Truth Social” network to communicate his views.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and at https://twitter.com/DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • public officials
  • Social Media
  • Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    November 30, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Leans Toward Reducing Enforcement Authority of Federal Agencies

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court seemed ready Wednesday to cut back on the authority of federal agencies to enforce their... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court seemed ready Wednesday to cut back on the authority of federal agencies to enforce their regulations through fines or seizures of property. Questions from the conservative majority of justices during a hearing focused on whether the agencies were committing unconstitutional procedural... Read More

    November 30, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Chaos Reigns as Democrats Vote to Subpoena Crow, Leo in SCOTUS Probe

    WASHINGTON — A Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday became the latest venue for Capitol Hill dysfunction as Democrats on... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday became the latest venue for Capitol Hill dysfunction as Democrats on the panel approved issuing subpoenas to billionaire Harlan Crow and influential conservative Leonard Leo as part of an ongoing investigation into alleged ethical lapses by Supreme... Read More

    November 28, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Asked to Parse Accelerated Sentencing Guidelines

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court returned to the bench for its December session on Monday, considering a pair of cases... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court returned to the bench for its December session on Monday, considering a pair of cases whose outcome could have sweeping consequences for the sentencing of recidivist offenders charged with federal crimes. The cases, which were consolidated for the sake of oral... Read More

    November 17, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Blocks Florida Law Banning Kids From Drag Shows

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a Florida law that bans child access to drag shows, saying... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a Florida law that bans child access to drag shows, saying it violates First Amendment free speech rights. Gov. Ron DeSantis and his supporters enacted the law to protect children from what they consider corrupt influences. The... Read More

    November 17, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Guns, Social Media and Fair Play for Whistleblowers Stand Out on Early Docket

    WASHINGTON — While “chaos” was the most apt description for certain parts of the federal government in October, the U.S.... Read More

    WASHINGTON — While “chaos” was the most apt description for certain parts of the federal government in October, the U.S. Supreme Court reconvened and got on with the business of unwinding the nation’s thorniest legal questions. By the time Congress finally chose Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La.,... Read More

    November 13, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Unveils Ethics Code for Justices

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court announced Monday that it is adopting a code of conduct for justices in the... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court announced Monday that it is adopting a code of conduct for justices in the wake of a series of revelations about undisclosed gifts and other benefits some had received from wealthy benefactors. In a statement accompanying the new code, the... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top