Supreme Court Takes Case of Warhol Portrait to Determine Copyright Infringement

March 29, 2022 by Tom Ramstack
Supreme Court Takes Case of Warhol Portrait to Determine Copyright Infringement
In this 1976 file photo, pop artist Andy Warhol smiles in New York. The Supreme Court has agreed to review a copyright dispute involving works of art by Warhol and a photographer who took an image of the musician Prince that the works are based on. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to review a case to determine whether artist Andy Warhol violated a photographer’s copyright by basing one of his artworks on a photograph of the musician Prince.

Both Warhol and Prince are deceased but photographer Lynn Goldsmith says the copyright on her photograph should allow her to share the financial benefits of Warhol’s artwork.

The silkscreen portrait depicts a somber image of Prince’s face that The Andy Warhol Foundation describes as “transformative” compared with Goldsmith’s photograph.

Under U.S. copyright law, transformative use or transformation of copyrighted material refers to a fair use that builds on the copyrighted work in a different manner or for a different purpose than the original. It is not considered a copyright infringement.


Goldsmith argues the Prince image is too close to her original photograph to be anything other than a copyright violation. Warhol called the 1984 portrait “Orange Prince.”

Implications of the Supreme Court ruling are likely to reach deep into the art world, where artists commonly try to build on popular images.

The case is reaching the Supreme Court now because Goldsmith found out about the Warhol artwork and sued after Prince died in 2016.

Warhol died in 1987. Although he is gone, his estate and The Andy Warhol Foundation continue to get payments from royalties on his artworks.

The trial court ruled in favor of The Andy Warhol Foundation. The judge agreed Warhol’s silkscreen was derived from the Goldsmith photograph but said Warhol transformed it from a photo showing a “vulnerable, uncomfortable person” into a portrait of “an iconic, larger-than-life figure.”


The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York disagreed.

Its ruling, written by Judge Gerard Lynch, said the lower court judge emphasized the subjective meaning of the portrait rather than using an objective standard to determine copyright infringement.

“The secondary work’s transformative purpose and character must, at a bare minimum, comprise something more than the imposition of another artist’s style on the primary work,” the appeals court decision said.

It added, “There can be no reasonable debate that the works are substantially similar. Any reasonable viewer with access to a range of such photographs including the Goldsmith photograph would have no difficulty identifying the latter as the source material for Warhol’s Prince Series.”

The Supreme Court is taking on the case to clear up confusion between the different opinions from the trial and appellate courts.

Case precedent from earlier Supreme Court decisions, including the 2021 case of Google v. Oracle, appears to conflict with the 2nd Circuit appellate ruling. The Supreme Court said artwork is transformative if it conveys a different meaning or message from the source material.

“Orange Prince” was one of several silkscreens in which Warhol used bright orange to draw renewed attention to his subjects. Others include “Orange Marilyn” of actress Marilyn Monroe, “Orange Car Crash” and “Orange Little Electric Chair.”

Goldsmith said in a statement last year after the 2nd Circuit ruling, “I fought this suit to protect not only my own rights, but the rights of all photographers and visual artists to make a living by licensing their creative work — and also to decide when, how, and even whether to exploit their creative works or license others to do so.”


The case is The Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, case number 21-869, in the Supreme Court of the United States.

Tom can be reached at [email protected]

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Litigation

September 30, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
Biden’s Student Loan Rules Revised While States Sue to Stop the Debt Relief

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration changed its rules on who qualifies for student loan forgiveness Thursday as seven states filed... Read More

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration changed its rules on who qualifies for student loan forgiveness Thursday as seven states filed lawsuits to block the plan that would wipe away $10,000 of debt for most borrowers. The states said in their lawsuit the Biden administration's student debt... Read More

September 27, 2022
by TWN Staff
New York City to Abide by Judge’s Ruling on Vaccine Mandate — For Now

NEW YORK — The city of New York will abide by a judge’s order barring enforcement of its COVID-19 vaccine... Read More

NEW YORK — The city of New York will abide by a judge’s order barring enforcement of its COVID-19 vaccine mandate for members of its largest police union while the decision is being appealed. On Friday, Manhattan State Supreme Court Judge Lyle Frank ruled the city... Read More

Biogen Pays $900M to Settle Doctor Kickback Allegations

BOSTON (AP) — Biogen has agreed to pay $900 million to resolve allegations that it violated federal law by paying... Read More

BOSTON (AP) — Biogen has agreed to pay $900 million to resolve allegations that it violated federal law by paying kickbacks to doctors to persuade them to prescribe its multiple sclerosis drugs, federal prosecutors said. The agreement announced Monday settles a whistleblower lawsuit brought by former... Read More

Trump's Legal Woes Mount Without Protection of Presidency

WASHINGTON (AP) — Stark repudiation by federal judges he appointed. Far-reaching fraud allegations by New York’s attorney general. It's been a week of widening... Read More

WASHINGTON (AP) — Stark repudiation by federal judges he appointed. Far-reaching fraud allegations by New York’s attorney general. It's been a week of widening legal troubles for Donald Trump, laying bare the challenges piling up as the former president operates without the protections afforded by the White House. The bravado that served... Read More

'Art of the Steal': Trump Accused of Vast Fraud in NY Suit

NEW YORK (AP) — Former President Donald Trump padded his net worth by billions of dollars and habitually misled banks... Read More

NEW YORK (AP) — Former President Donald Trump padded his net worth by billions of dollars and habitually misled banks and others about the value of prized assets like golf courses, hotels and his Mar-a-Lago estate, New York’s attorney general said Wednesday in a lawsuit that... Read More

September 14, 2022
by Madeline Hughes
California Sues Amazon for 'Taking Vengeance' on Small Businesses

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The state of California is suing Amazon alleging antitrust violations of how the “dominant online retail store... Read More

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The state of California is suing Amazon alleging antitrust violations of how the “dominant online retail store in the United States” takes vengeance on small businesses who attempt to put their products on other websites for cheaper prices, according to the lawsuit. “For... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top