Justice Dept. Intervenes Against Trump In Lawsuit Against Social Media Giants

November 23, 2021 by Tom Ramstack
Justice Dept. Intervenes Against Trump In Lawsuit Against Social Media Giants

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department intervened this week in a lawsuit former President Donald Trump filed against social media companies Facebook, Twitter and Google’s YouTube.

Trump accuses the companies of violating his First Amendment right to free speech by banning his postings after the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

Trump’s lawsuit also attacks a federal regulation that gives the companies control over information third parties post on their websites. The lawsuit argues that section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is unconstitutional.

The Justice Department’s court filing says that because Trump is suing based on federal law, the government has a right to intervene.


“The United States has an unconditional statutory right to intervene ‘[i]n any action . . . wherein the constitutionality of any Act of Congress affecting the public interest is drawn in question[.],’” the government’s court filing says while citing federal law.

Even before Trump filed his lawsuit, Section 230 fell under criticism in Congress and in the courts.

Critics of the social media companies say it allows them to control the information accessed by hundreds of millions of people daily but shields them from liability when they make poor choices. They have been accused of censorship by Trump and other conservatives.

President Joe Biden has called for Section 230 to be revoked. He also said that without better regulation of content, social media sites sometimes allow misinformation to be transmitted.


A recent example emerged when the first COVID-19 vaccines became available late last year. Anti-vaxxers incorrectly posted information on Facebook and Twitter saying they were dangerous and unnecessary, potentially frightening away people who later became infected and died.

The Big Tech companies say eliminating Section 230 would expose them to unending lawsuits. 

The result could be court-ordered content that violates First Amendment rights of the media, company executives said during recent congressional hearings. It also could force companies like Facebook, Twitter and Google out of business.

Trump seeks a court order that would restore his social media accounts as well as giving him punitive damages. The lawsuit was originally filed in federal court in Florida but the companies convinced a judge to switch it to California.

The lawsuit also names chief executive officers Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, Jack Dorsey of Twitter and Sundar Pichai of Google and Alphabet as defendants.

They argue in court filings that Trump’s class action lawsuit lacks merit because the First Amendment provisions he accuses them of violating apply to government entities, not private corporations.

The First Amendment says, “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech.”


Facebook and Twitter argue that they were not trying to curtail his free speech but to prevent further violence. Trump incited his supporters minutes before the Jan. 6 insurrection by saying voter fraud created a “rigged election” that gave the presidency to Biden.

Tom can be reached at [email protected].

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Litigation

June 17, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
Environmentalists’ Lawsuit Tries to Block Federal Oil and Gas Drilling Leases

WASHINGTON — An environmentalists’ lawsuit filed this week in Washington, D.C., seeks to block the Biden administration from giving oil... Read More

WASHINGTON — An environmentalists’ lawsuit filed this week in Washington, D.C., seeks to block the Biden administration from giving oil companies more than 3,500 permits to drill on federal lands.  The coalition of environmental groups says Biden has not considered the effects on climate change and... Read More

June 15, 2022
by Dan McCue
Amazon, Cartier Sue Social Media Influencer, Businesses, Over Counterfeits

SEATTLE – Amazon and Cartier filed joint lawsuits against an unnamed social media influencer and eight businesses on Wednesday on... Read More

SEATTLE – Amazon and Cartier filed joint lawsuits against an unnamed social media influencer and eight businesses on Wednesday on claims they advertised, promoted, and facilitated the sale of counterfeit luxury goods through Instagram and other websites. The federal lawsuits, filed in the Western District of... Read More

June 15, 2022
by Dan McCue
New York’s Highest Court Puts Kibosh on Bid to Consolidate Primaries

ALBANY, N.Y. — An effort by the League of Women Voters to consolidate New York State’s primary elections in August... Read More

ALBANY, N.Y. — An effort by the League of Women Voters to consolidate New York State’s primary elections in August has been rejected by the state Court of Appeals. The ruling handed down on Tuesday means voters in New York will cast ballots on two different... Read More

June 1, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
Johnny Depp Is Biggest Winner in Lawsuits Between the Actor and His Ex-Wife

FAIRFAX, Va. — Actor Johnny Depp came out ahead Wednesday in conflicting lawsuits for defamation between him and his ex-wife,... Read More

FAIRFAX, Va. — Actor Johnny Depp came out ahead Wednesday in conflicting lawsuits for defamation between him and his ex-wife, Amber Heard. A jury in Fairfax awarded Depp a total of $15 million in damages but $2 million for fellow actress Heard. The lawsuits were prompted... Read More

June 1, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
British Activist Sued by Russian in D.C. Under Long-Arm Statute

WASHINGTON — A former Russian-American spy is suing a British political activist for defamation in Washington, D.C., after convincing a... Read More

WASHINGTON — A former Russian-American spy is suing a British political activist for defamation in Washington, D.C., after convincing a federal court the District of Columbia's "long-arm" statute applies to his lawsuit. Although William Browder was not in the nation’s capital when he made the derogatory... Read More

May 27, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
Judge Grants Injunction Against Sale of ‘Wizard of Oz’ Dress

WASHINGTON — An auction scheduled for last Tuesday of a dress worn by actress Judy Garland in the 1939 movie... Read More

WASHINGTON — An auction scheduled for last Tuesday of a dress worn by actress Judy Garland in the 1939 movie “The Wizard of Oz” is on hold until a federal judge can determine who owns it. Catholic University in Washington, D.C., claims it was given to... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top