DOJ Argues Trump Not Immune From Jan. 6 Liability Claims

March 2, 2023 by Dan McCue
DOJ Argues Trump Not Immune From Jan. 6 Liability Claims
In this Tuesday, May 1, 2018, photo, President Donald Trump speaks during a ceremony to present the Commander in Chief trophy to the U.S. Military Academy football team in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON — Former President Donald Trump should not be able to claim executive immunity from liability claims arising from the Jan. 6, 2021, siege on the U.S. Capitol, the Justice Department said in a court filing on Thursday.

The filing is the latest development in consolidated cases filed by members of Congress and Capitol Police officers since the riot that left five people dead and, according to some estimates, as many as 140 law enforcement officers injured.

In February 2022, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, presiding in the District of Columbia, held that Trump’s urging the crowd to “fight like hell” during a rally on the White House ellipse the morning of the siege was a blatant case of incitement, barring the former president from claiming immunity.

Since then, however, attorneys for Trump have argued in the U.S. Appeals Court for the District of Columbia that the president was merely speaking on “matters of public concern” pertaining to the validity of the 2020 election, and therefore must be given immunity to protect the constitutionally mandated separation of powers.


“Although courts should be reluctant to conclude that a suit against the president is based on conduct that lies beyond the outer perimeter of his office, the United States agrees with the district court that a meaningful perimeter exists,” wrote Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian Boynton in the DOJ’s new filing.

Nixon v. Fitzgerald establishes a rule of absolute immunity for the president’s official acts. It is not a rule of absolute immunity for the president regardless of the nature of his acts,” he wrote.


“Here, the district court concluded that plaintiffs’ complaints plausibly allege that president Trump’s speech at the rally on Jan. 6, 2021, precipitated the ensuing attack on the Capitol — and, in particular, that the complaints plausibly allege that the former president’s speech encouraged imminent private violent action and was likely to produce such action,” the filing continues. 

“The United States expresses no view on that conclusion, or on the truth of the allegations in plaintiffs’ complaints,” Boynton wrote. “But in the United States’ view, such incitement of imminent private violence would not be within the outer perimeter of the Office of the President of the United States.”

The deputy assistant attorney general goes on to note that Trump himself, “has not challenged the district court’s conclusion — reiterated by plaintiffs on appeal — that the complaints plausibly allege that his speech instigated the attack on the Capitol.”

“Instead, his briefs advance only a single, categorical argument: A president is always immune from any civil suits based on his ‘speech on matters of public concern,’” … even if that speech also constitutes incitement to imminent private violence. 

“The United States respectfully submits that the court should reject that categorical argument,” Boynton wrote. “And because that is the only argument the former president has pressed on appeal, the court could affirm the district court’s order on that narrow ground without attempting to comprehensively define the boundaries of the president’s immunity for his speech on matters of public concern — including when and how to draw a line between the president’s official and electoral speech.


“Those are sensitive questions of fundamental importance to the executive branch, and this unusual case would be a poor vehicle for resolving them,” he concluded. 

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and @DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • Donald Trump
  • Jan 6
  • liability
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Litigation

    June 1, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Amazon to Pay $30M Settlement Over Alleged Privacy Violations

    WASHINGTON — Amazon.com Inc. agreed Wednesday to pay more than $30 million to settle complaints by federal regulators who say... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Amazon.com Inc. agreed Wednesday to pay more than $30 million to settle complaints by federal regulators who say the tech giant trampled the privacy of children who used its Alexa voice assistant and of users of its home security camera company, Ring LLC. The... Read More

    May 26, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Federal Court Upholds Admissions Policy at Virginia High School

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — A federal court in Virginia this week upheld a state high school’s admission policy intended to achieve... Read More

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — A federal court in Virginia this week upheld a state high school’s admission policy intended to achieve racial equity despite complaints from parents that it discriminates against Asian American students. Administrators of the highly rated Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology... Read More

    May 23, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    DC Transit’s Common Carrier Status Under Fire in Wrongful Death Claim

    WASHINGTON — Washington, D.C.'s transit agency is trying to win dismissal of a lawsuit by the family of a lawyer... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Washington, D.C.'s transit agency is trying to win dismissal of a lawsuit by the family of a lawyer who died after falling off a subway platform while intoxicated in a case testing the limits of common carrier liability. Okiemute C. Whiteru, a 35-year-old lawyer,... Read More

    May 22, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Federal Judge Upholds Offshore Wind Farm Permits

    BOSTON — A federal judge in Massachusetts ruled against a Nantucket nonprofit trying to block development of a large offshore... Read More

    BOSTON — A federal judge in Massachusetts ruled against a Nantucket nonprofit trying to block development of a large offshore wind farm about 15 miles off the coast of the island and Martha’s Vineyard. In its underlying complaint, the group Nantucket Residents Against Turbines claimed the... Read More

    May 18, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    NRA Sues Maryland’s Governor Over Gun Restriction Laws

    BALTIMORE — The National Rifle Association sued Maryland's governor this week to block new gun control laws that place tight... Read More

    BALTIMORE — The National Rifle Association sued Maryland's governor this week to block new gun control laws that place tight restrictions on where guns can be carried.  The laws ban guns from being carried anywhere close to schools, hospitals and other sensitive locations. The NRA says... Read More

    May 8, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Union Sues US Treasury to Prevent Government Shutdown

    BOSTON — A union of federal employees petitioned a federal court Monday seeking to prevent the government from shutting down... Read More

    BOSTON — A union of federal employees petitioned a federal court Monday seeking to prevent the government from shutting down if the U.S. budget reaches its debt limit. The petition from the National Association of Government Employees says President Joe Biden should be banned by court... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top