DOJ Argues Trump Not Immune From Jan. 6 Liability Claims

March 2, 2023 by Dan McCue
DOJ Argues Trump Not Immune From Jan. 6 Liability Claims
In this Tuesday, May 1, 2018, photo, President Donald Trump speaks during a ceremony to present the Commander in Chief trophy to the U.S. Military Academy football team in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON — Former President Donald Trump should not be able to claim executive immunity from liability claims arising from the Jan. 6, 2021, siege on the U.S. Capitol, the Justice Department said in a court filing on Thursday.

The filing is the latest development in consolidated cases filed by members of Congress and Capitol Police officers since the riot that left five people dead and, according to some estimates, as many as 140 law enforcement officers injured.

In February 2022, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, presiding in the District of Columbia, held that Trump’s urging the crowd to “fight like hell” during a rally on the White House ellipse the morning of the siege was a blatant case of incitement, barring the former president from claiming immunity.

Since then, however, attorneys for Trump have argued in the U.S. Appeals Court for the District of Columbia that the president was merely speaking on “matters of public concern” pertaining to the validity of the 2020 election, and therefore must be given immunity to protect the constitutionally mandated separation of powers.

“Although courts should be reluctant to conclude that a suit against the president is based on conduct that lies beyond the outer perimeter of his office, the United States agrees with the district court that a meaningful perimeter exists,” wrote Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian Boynton in the DOJ’s new filing.

Nixon v. Fitzgerald establishes a rule of absolute immunity for the president’s official acts. It is not a rule of absolute immunity for the president regardless of the nature of his acts,” he wrote.

“Here, the district court concluded that plaintiffs’ complaints plausibly allege that president Trump’s speech at the rally on Jan. 6, 2021, precipitated the ensuing attack on the Capitol — and, in particular, that the complaints plausibly allege that the former president’s speech encouraged imminent private violent action and was likely to produce such action,” the filing continues. 

“The United States expresses no view on that conclusion, or on the truth of the allegations in plaintiffs’ complaints,” Boynton wrote. “But in the United States’ view, such incitement of imminent private violence would not be within the outer perimeter of the Office of the President of the United States.”

The deputy assistant attorney general goes on to note that Trump himself, “has not challenged the district court’s conclusion — reiterated by plaintiffs on appeal — that the complaints plausibly allege that his speech instigated the attack on the Capitol.”

“Instead, his briefs advance only a single, categorical argument: A president is always immune from any civil suits based on his ‘speech on matters of public concern,’” … even if that speech also constitutes incitement to imminent private violence. 

“The United States respectfully submits that the court should reject that categorical argument,” Boynton wrote. “And because that is the only argument the former president has pressed on appeal, the court could affirm the district court’s order on that narrow ground without attempting to comprehensively define the boundaries of the president’s immunity for his speech on matters of public concern — including when and how to draw a line between the president’s official and electoral speech.

“Those are sensitive questions of fundamental importance to the executive branch, and this unusual case would be a poor vehicle for resolving them,” he concluded. 

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and @DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • Donald Trump
  • Jan 6
  • liability
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Litigation

    May 5, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Eighteen AGs Sue Trump Administration Over Wind Farm Policies

    WASHINGTON — A coalition of 18 attorneys general representing 17 states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A coalition of 18 attorneys general representing 17 states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration on Monday over what they are calling its “unlawful attempt” to freeze the development of wind energy. In a 101-page complaint filed in federal court in... Read More

    April 25, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Government Lawyers Mistakenly Admit New York Congestion Pricing Is Legal

    WASHINGTON — The Trump administration’s lawyers appear to have booby-trapped their own chances this week of defeating New York City’s... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Trump administration’s lawyers appear to have booby-trapped their own chances this week of defeating New York City’s congestion pricing program that charges motorists for driving downtown. They inadvertently filed a memo with the court overseeing a lawsuit between the state and federal government... Read More

    April 22, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Federal Trade Commission Sues Uber Alleging Deceit in Subscriptions

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Federal Trade Commission sued rideshare company Uber Technologies Inc. Monday, alleging a pattern of deceit against... Read More

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Federal Trade Commission sued rideshare company Uber Technologies Inc. Monday, alleging a pattern of deceit against consumers intended to maximize profits. The lawsuit says Uber used hidden charges, failed to deliver on promised savings and made it difficult for customers to cancel... Read More

    April 15, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Meta’s Zuckerberg Defends Against Allegations of Monopoly Tactics

    WASHINGTON — Meta Platforms Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg testified for a second day Tuesday in a Washington, D.C., court that... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Meta Platforms Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg testified for a second day Tuesday in a Washington, D.C., court that his company has encouraged the growth of social media but not the anticompetitive dominance alleged by the Federal Trade Commission. The trial in the antitrust case... Read More

    April 4, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Protests and New Lawsuit Follow Trump’s Economic Announcements 

    PENSACOLA, Fla. — The first lawsuit was filed Thursday to oppose President Donald Trump's tariffs on China in a growing... Read More

    PENSACOLA, Fla. — The first lawsuit was filed Thursday to oppose President Donald Trump's tariffs on China in a growing tide of protests against his administration. The New Civil Liberties Alliance filed the lawsuit on behalf of a small Florida business that sells stationery and other... Read More

    March 20, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    New York’s Top Court Nixes Bid for Noncitizen Voting in NYC

    ALBANY, N.Y. — New York state’s highest court on Thursday ended an effort by the New York City Council to... Read More

    ALBANY, N.Y. — New York state’s highest court on Thursday ended an effort by the New York City Council to allow noncitizens to vote in municipal elections. Though the local law never went into effect, the Democrat-led city council heralded its passage in December 2021, calling... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top