Trump Advisor’s Lawsuit Dismissed Despite FBI Warrant Errors

September 2, 2022 by Tom Ramstack
Trump Advisor’s Lawsuit Dismissed Despite FBI Warrant Errors
Carter Page, a foreign policy adviser to Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, speaks with reporters following a day of questions from the House Intelligence Committee, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

WASHINGTON — A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit filed by Trump administration advisor Carter Page after he was investigated by the FBI for alleged illegal ties to the Russian government.

The investigation included tapping his phone, which a later inspector general’s report concluded was done without proper legal authorization.

“I’ve been the victim of one of the most horrendous civil rights violations in recent U.S. election history,” Page told CNN during an April 2017 televised interview. 

He claimed $75 million in damages against the Justice Department and FBI for violations of his Fourth Amendment rights to privacy.

The surveillance “violated federal statutes enacted to prevent unlawful spying on United States persons, as well as the Constitution,” Page’s lawsuit said.

District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich agreed in her 54-page ruling that Page raised “troubling” questions about how the FBI handled the investigation but they did not rise to the violation Page claimed.

The FBI began investigating Page shortly after he gave a speech critical of U.S. policy toward Russia in July 2016 at a university in Moscow.

Before he became a foreign policy advisor to Donald Trump, Page was a petroleum industry consultant. His work included contracts with Russian government-controlled oil and gas company Gazprom.

FBI agents sought a warrant to wiretap Page before a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court. The special federal court is authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to oversee requests for surveillance warrants against foreign spies.

The FBI agents said they were concerned Page cooperated with Russian intelligence services that were trying to influence the 2016 presidential election in favor of Donald Trump.

Page was one of several Trump associates the FBI investigated during Operation Crossfire Hurricane, which was the code name for a nearly yearlong investigation into numerous links between Russian officials and the Trump presidential campaign.

The Justice Department inspector general’s report said the FBI’s procedure for getting a wiretap warrant on Page was riddled with errors and sloppy work.

It included drawing evidence from a discredited dossier written by a retired British spy. There also were omissions of fact and false statements, the inspector general reported.

Two of the four FISA warrants the FBI obtained were declared invalid by a different federal court in 2019.

Regardless of the mistakes, Friedrich said Page failed to prove the damages he claimed.

One reason his lawsuit failed was because Page sued the wrong people, the judge said. The named defendants helped draft court filings for the surveillance warrant but did not participate in investigating Page.

“To the extent these allegations are true, there is little question that many individual defendants, as well as the agency as a whole, engaged in wrongdoing,” Friedrich wrote. “Even so, Page has brought no actionable claim against any individual defendant or against the United States.”

Friedrich issued her ruling on the same day President Joe Biden denounced Trump and his supporters during a prime-time television presentation. He said they were trying to “promote authoritarian leaders.”

Tom can be reached at [email protected] and @TomRamstack

A+
a-
  • Carter Page
  • FBI
  • Justice Department
  • Russia
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Law

    AP Exclusive: America's Black Attorneys General Talk Race, Politics and Justice System

    BOSTON (AP) — The American legal system is facing a crisis of trust in communities around the country, with people... Read More

    BOSTON (AP) — The American legal system is facing a crisis of trust in communities around the country, with people of all races and across the political spectrum. For many, recent protests against police brutality called attention to longstanding discrepancies in the administration of justice. For others, criticism... Read More

    November 30, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    New York Appellate Court Reinstates Trump Gag Orders

    NEW YORK — A New York appeals court panel on Thursday reinstated a pair of gag orders issued in Donald... Read More

    NEW YORK — A New York appeals court panel on Thursday reinstated a pair of gag orders issued in Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial that barred the former president from speaking publicly about the judge’s court staff. The two-page decision by the New York State Supreme... Read More

    November 22, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Appeals Court Restricts Right to Sue Under the Voting Rights Act

    ST. LOUIS — A federal appeals court ruling this week limits the authority for lawsuits to enforce the Voting Rights... Read More

    ST. LOUIS — A federal appeals court ruling this week limits the authority for lawsuits to enforce the Voting Rights Act to government agencies. The ruling by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals means individuals and civil rights advocates can no longer sue to protect voting... Read More

    November 21, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    4th Circuit Tosses Maryland’s Handgun Licensing Requirement

    RICHMOND, Va. — A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that Maryland’s preliminary handgun-licensure requirement is unconstitutional and cannot be enforced.... Read More

    RICHMOND, Va. — A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that Maryland’s preliminary handgun-licensure requirement is unconstitutional and cannot be enforced. In its ruling, a divided 4th Circuit held that the requirement unlawfully restricts the ability of law-abiding adults to possess guns. Passed in 2016, Maryland’s Handgun... Read More

    November 20, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Appeals Court Considers Lifting Gag Order Against Trump

    WASHINGTON — Federal appeals judges in Washington, D.C., seemed skeptical Monday about arguments by attorneys for Donald Trump that a... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Federal appeals judges in Washington, D.C., seemed skeptical Monday about arguments by attorneys for Donald Trump that a gag order should be withdrawn to allow him to criticize court personnel in his election interference case. Trump has used phrases like “corrupt,” “deranged” and “red... Read More

    November 17, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Trump's Mistrial Request Rejected in NY Civil Fraud Case

    NEW YORK — A state court judge in New York on Friday rejected former President Donald Trump’s request for a... Read More

    NEW YORK — A state court judge in New York on Friday rejected former President Donald Trump’s request for a mistrial in his $250 million civil business fraud case. In dismissing the request to toss the case, Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron said he could... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top