Bannon Asks Court to Toss Contempt Verdict

August 5, 2022 by Dan McCue
Bannon Asks Court to Toss Contempt Verdict
Former White House strategist Steve Bannon pauses to speak with reporters after departing federal court, Monday, Nov. 15, 2021, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

WASHINGTON — Former Trump Advisor Steve Bannon is asking a federal judge to throw out the guilty verdict against him on a contempt of Congress charge, claiming a pretrial decision barring him from calling members of Congress as witnesses violated his due process rights.

In the lead-in to his jury trial last month, Bannon’s attorneys had attempted to subpoena House Select Committee Chair Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and others on the panel.

But U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols quickly quashed the subpoenas, agreeing with federal prosecutors that the Constitution’s speech or debate clause prevented Thompson and other members of the select committee from being compelled to testify at trial. 

Prosecutors instead called the committee’s chief counsel, Kristin Amerling, who the government maintained had the same knowledge about the subpoena to Bannon as any member of the committee.


The move caused Bannon to go on a tirade before reporters outside the courthouse later that day.

During his discourse, Bannon called Thompson a disgrace and said the panel’s members didn’t have the guts to testify against him in court.


“Why is Bennie Thompson not here defending his committee, the show trial, the Moscow show trial of the 1930s? Why is he not here in person?” Bannon seethed.

In their court filing, Bannon attorneys Evan Corcoran and David Schoen take a more measured approach, saying Nichols’ decision denied their client his “right to due process of law, his right to compulsory process, his right of confrontation, his right to effective assistance of counsel and to a fair jury trial.”

The court filing asks Nichols to dismiss the indictment or otherwise exclude the evidence from Amerling, which amounted to nearly the government’s entire case. 

Bannon’s lawyers maintain it was “impossible to fully challenge the government’s evidence as presented through a congressional staffer” and that, because of congressional immunity, they weren’t given any of the specific documents they requested other than those Amerling voluntarily gave to the prosecution.


Prosecutors are expected to file a response to Bannon’s filing early next week.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and @DanMcCue

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Law

August 18, 2022
by Dan McCue
Judge Orders DOJ to Redact Affidavit as He Considers Its Unsealing

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A federal judge Thursday ordered the Justice Department to propose redactions to the affidavit used... Read More

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A federal judge Thursday ordered the Justice Department to propose redactions to the affidavit used to justify a search warrant the FBI used last week to search former President Donald Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago. Federal Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart ruled from... Read More

August 18, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
Ohio Judge Orders Pharmacies to Pay $650M for Opioid Abuse

CLEVELAND — Pharmacy chains CVS, Walgreens and Walmart must pay $650.5 million to help with the opioid recovery efforts of... Read More

CLEVELAND — Pharmacy chains CVS, Walgreens and Walmart must pay $650.5 million to help with the opioid recovery efforts of two Ohio counties, a federal judge ruled Wednesday. He agreed with officials in Lake and Trumbull counties that the pharmacies’ failure to protect their customers who... Read More

August 17, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
Appeals Court Says Judicial Workers Can Engage in Political Activities

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., this week refused to allow a series of restrictions on... Read More

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., this week refused to allow a series of restrictions on the political activity of some judicial workers. The court’s ruling said the two workers who sued to block the restrictions have a First Amendment right of... Read More

August 16, 2022
by Dan McCue
DOJ Asks Judge to Keep Trump Search Affidavit Under Seal

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department on Monday asked a federal judge to keep sealed the sworn affidavit that provided the... Read More

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department on Monday asked a federal judge to keep sealed the sworn affidavit that provided the in-depth explanation for why it needed to search former President Donald Trump’s Palm Beach, Florida, home. Republican allies of the former president have been calling for... Read More

August 12, 2022
by Tom Ramstack
Mistrial in Michigan Water Contamination Lawsuit Blamed on Jury Stress

FLINT, Mich. — A federal judge declared a mistrial Thursday in a lawsuit over contamination of the Flint, Michigan, water... Read More

FLINT, Mich. — A federal judge declared a mistrial Thursday in a lawsuit over contamination of the Flint, Michigan, water supply after jurors who were unable to reach a verdict told him they were too stressed to continue. After nearly a week of deliberations, the jurors... Read More

August 11, 2022
by Dan McCue
Justice Department Files Motion to Unseal Search Warrant, Receipt From Trump Raid

WASHINGTON — Attorney General Merrick Garland broke his silence on Monday’s raid on the Palm Beach, Florida, home of former... Read More

WASHINGTON — Attorney General Merrick Garland broke his silence on Monday’s raid on the Palm Beach, Florida, home of former President Donald Trump, announcing that the Justice Department has filed a motion in the federal court in South Florida to unseal the  search warrant and property... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top