Supreme Court Declines to Strike Down Seattle Campaign Finance Voucher System
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a challenge to Seattle’s “Democracy Voucher Program,” leaving in place the city’s public financing program for local elections.
Though the justices offered no explanation for their decision not to weigh in on the case, their denial of review leaves in place a Washington Superior Court ruling that dismissed a taxpayer challenge to the program.
The underlying case is Elster v. City of Seattle, in which two Seattle property owners aimed to have the program struck down as unconstitutional.
Seattle voters overwhelmingly approved a public referendum on the voucher program in 2015 and it went into effect two years later. It offers any eligible adult city resident who is a U.S. citizen four $25 vouchers that they can then give to the qualified local political candidates of their choosing.
The money to fund the program comes from a special tax on property.
Prior to the vote on the referendum, it was touted as “giving more people an opportunity to have their voices heard in our democracy,” and as “vital to ensure the people of Seattle have equal opportunity to participate in political campaigns and be heard by candidates, [and] to strengthen democracy.”
But Mark Elster and Sarah Pynchon, who own property in Seattle, argued the law creating the program effectively forced them to fund other individual’s private speech, violating their First Amendment rights.
“The bottom line here is that the First Amendment includes the right to speak but also includes the right not to speak. You should have a right not to speak,” said Ethan Blevins, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, shortly after the lawsuit was filed.
A local trial court ruled against the taxpayers, as did the Washington Supreme Court on appeal in July 2019.
The state Supreme Court noted that the program “resembles other content-neutral ways the government facilitates political speech, for example, when the government distributes voters’ pamphlets.”
According to the University of Washington’s Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology, a total of 20,727 Seattle residents used their vouchers to contribute to local candidates in 2017.
In addition to increasing the absolute number of city residents who contributed, Seattle’s voucher program attracted a more diverse makeup of donors to local campaigns, the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center said.
Compared to individuals giving a private cash contribution in Seattle’s 2017 election, voucher users were more likely to be in the low-to-middle income bracket and to reside in the city’s poorest neighborhoods. Further, the population of voucher donors contained a higher share of minority groups and residents under the age of 30 than the cash contributor pool, the Center said.
On Monday, Paul Smith, vice president of the Campaign Legal Center, which filed a brief in support of the city, said the Supreme Court was right to leave the lower court’s decision in place.
“Seattle’s innovative program loosens the stranglehold that large donors have had over the terms of political debate by giving a more diverse pool of people an opportunity to have their voices heard in politics,” Smith said. “Our victory in this case protects campaign finance reform efforts around the country and helps uphold the constitutional principle of self-governance. Five years ago, Seattle citizens sent a clear message at the polls: a citizen’s lack of wealth should not exclude them from participation in the process by which candidates fund campaigns to run for public office. It is nice to see the misguided challenge to that decision come to an end.”
In The News
WASHINGTON — The Federal Elections Commissions failed to act on an administrative complaint from the Campaign Legal Center in a... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Federal Elections Commissions failed to act on an administrative complaint from the Campaign Legal Center in a timely fashion and must now resolve the matter within the next 30 days, a federal court ruled Thursday. The ruling stems from a complaint the Campaign... Read More
WASHINGTON — Former Green Party candidate Jill Stein and her campaign committee, Jill Stein for President, are asking the U.S.... Read More
WASHINGTON — Former Green Party candidate Jill Stein and her campaign committee, Jill Stein for President, are asking the U.S. Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia to review a Federal Elections Commission order that she repay $175,272 in matching funds she received during the... Read More
WASHINGTON — Nine-term Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, R-Neb., has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of lying to... Read More
WASHINGTON — Nine-term Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, R-Neb., has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of lying to the FBI and concealing information from federal agents investigating campaign contributions illegally made to him by a Nigerian billionaire. The indictment stems from an FBI investigation... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — The campaign organization aiming to maintain Democratic control of the House in the 2022 midterm races raised... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — The campaign organization aiming to maintain Democratic control of the House in the 2022 midterm races raised $10 million last month, its best August haul ever during a year without a national election. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee says that nearly 250,000 grassroots... Read More
Rep. Robin Kelly can remain chairwoman of the Illinois Democratic Party, but must insulate herself from all fundraising for non... Read More
Rep. Robin Kelly can remain chairwoman of the Illinois Democratic Party, but must insulate herself from all fundraising for non federal candidates in the state, the Federal Election Commission ruled Thursday. Kelly, a member of Congress since 2013, is also prohibited from using her name and... Read More
WASHINGTON - The nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center filed a complaint with the FEC on Thursday accusing 18 super PACs of... Read More
WASHINGTON - The nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center filed a complaint with the FEC on Thursday accusing 18 super PACs of illegally pouring $200 million into competitive elections between 2017 and 2020 while allegedly concealing their ties to congressional leaders. In a 50-page complaint, the Washington, D.C.-based... Read More