Gun Dealers Lose Appeal to Block New York Background Check Law

September 14, 2023 by Tom Ramstack
Gun Dealers Lose Appeal to Block New York Background Check Law
Justice Sonia Sotomayor

WASHINGTON — U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Tuesday rejected an emergency appeal from New York gun dealers trying to block a new background check law that would have state police review gun license applications instead of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

State police background checks are expected to result in more denials of gun licenses, potentially reducing sales for gun dealers.

Gun shop owners say the state law violates the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which allows private ownership of guns.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul signed the law switching background checks to state police in June 2022 for all “firearm, rifle, shotgun and ammunition purchases.”

Hochul welcomed Sotomayor’s decision Wednesday during a press briefing when she said, “As a result of Justice Sotomayor’s actions last night, we can be assured and feel secure that our law is sound, that it is going to be implemented.”

New background check procedures in the law, called the Empire State’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act, took effect Wednesday. Other provisions of the law, such as a requirement for dealers to keep documents or electronic records to prove gun purchases and sales, started Sept. 1.

New York lawmakers enacted the new law as a response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen case. The 2022 ruling struck down a centuries-old New York law that required gun license applicants to show a “proper cause” to carry a firearm.

The gun dealers used language similar to the Supreme Court in the Bruen case when they said in a legal brief filed with the court, “In sum, the challenged mandates are preempted by federal law, or unconstitutional under the Second, Fifth and 14th Amendments, and are unconstitutional under ‘to keep’ or ‘to keep and bear arms’ of the Second Amendment.”

The nine gun dealers who filed the emergency appeal argue that state police lack the technical skill to properly assess whether a gun license should be granted. They also say the state did not properly train the police.

In a short period of time, the state police are supposed “to bring a highly specialized industry online and train them on live relay transaction software,” the emergency appeal said. “It can’t be done, and defendants are needlessly interfering in an existing [FBI firearms license] relationship with a federal system that is fully operational.”

Sotomayor handles emergency appeals to the Supreme Court for the Second Circuit, which consists of Connecticut, New York and Vermont. She denied the gun dealers’ appeal without comment.

Other parts of the emergency appeal ask to stop police from conducting on-site inspections of gun shops for “terrorism compliance,” which the gun shop owners say is unconstitutional.

Since Sept. 13, New York state police from their “terrorism” unit have conducted surprise on-site inspections of gun shops.

“It had the intended effect of destabilizing these individual dealers, in addition to sending a tremor through the industry,” the emergency appeal says.

Gun dealers also sought to block a requirement that gun shop customers pay for background checks. The fees would be $2.50 for background checks before purchasing ammunition and $9 for guns. 

The emergency appeal was led by husband and wife gun shop owners Seth and Nadine Gazzola. They said the state law would “put them out of business.”

Sotomayor’s ruling Tuesday is the second time the Gazzolas lost an appeal to the Supreme Court. On Jan. 18, their petition for an injunction against the law was denied.

The appeal before Sotomayor was titled Gazzola v. Hochul.

You can reach us at [email protected] and follow us on Facebook and Twitter

A+
a-
  • background checks
  • New York
  • Second Amendment
  • Sonia Sotomayor
  • Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    April 25, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Loud, Raucous Crowd Gathers Outside Supreme Court, but MAGA Hard to Find

    WASHINGTON — They banged on pots. They banged on pans. They raised their voices and even jingled a few tambourines. ... Read More

    WASHINGTON — They banged on pots. They banged on pans. They raised their voices and even jingled a few tambourines.  All in the hope of making their opinions plain to the nine justices assembled inside to hear the most consequential and final case of the current... Read More

    April 25, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Cautious Over Claims of Absolute Immunity for Trump

    WASHINGTON — Comments from Supreme Court justices Thursday indicated former President Donald Trump is likely to face criminal and civil... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Comments from Supreme Court justices Thursday indicated former President Donald Trump is likely to face criminal and civil charges despite his claim of immunity while he was president. Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election led to felony charges against him that include... Read More

    April 16, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Divided on Law for Prosecuting Jan. 6 Rioters

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether to throw out criminal charges of obstructing an official... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether to throw out criminal charges of obstructing an official proceeding against Jan. 6 defendants, including former President Donald Trump. About 350 persons who invaded the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection have been charged... Read More

    Five Takeaways From the Abortion Pill Case Before US Supreme Court

    WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday did not appear ready to limit access to the abortion pill mifepristone,... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday did not appear ready to limit access to the abortion pill mifepristone, in a case that could have far-reaching implications for millions of American women and for scores of drugs regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. It's... Read More

    March 26, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Skeptical of Ban on Abortion Pill Mifepristone

    WASHINGTON — A hearing Tuesday before the Supreme Court indicated a majority of the justices want to maintain women’s access... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A hearing Tuesday before the Supreme Court indicated a majority of the justices want to maintain women’s access to the abortion pill mifepristone despite objections from anti-abortion activists. The doctors and organizations who sued argued the Food and Drug Administration was wrong in granting... Read More

    March 19, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Gives Texas Green Light to Deport Illegal Immigrants

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to begin enforcing a state law that effectively allows officials... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to begin enforcing a state law that effectively allows officials to deport undocumented immigrants, despite objections from the Biden administration, which argued only the federal government has authority over immigration issues. In an unsigned order, the... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top