Ohio Judge Rules In Favor of Late-Jailed Voters
A federal judge in Ohio ruled the state must discontinue its practice of disenfranchising eligible voters who are arrested and held in pre-trial detention in the final days leading up to an election.
The case has its roots in the 2018 midterm election. Just days before the vote, Tommy Mays and Quinton Nelson were arrested in separate instances.
According to the U.S. District Judge Michael Watson’s opinion, Mays, who was arrested on Nov. 3, three days before the election, asked how he could exercise his right to vote while in jail and no one could tell him.
Both Mays and Nelson, who was arrested on Nov. 2, filed an emergency petition on Election Day asking the court to allow them to vote.
The court found in their favor and ordered that absentee ballots be brought to them.
While the case addressed the specific concerns of Mays and Nelson, voting rights advocates said it failed to do anything about the state’s practices related to voting and recent jailed suspects.
The lawsuit then morphed into a class action suit, representing all Ohioans denied the right to vote while in pre-trial detention.
“Eligible voters who are arrested and detained pre-trial by the state in the days leading up to an election deserve equal protection from the U.S. Constitution,” said Jonathan Diaz, legal counsel, voting rights at Campaign Legal Center, which advanced the class action.
“A person’s ability to cast a ballot should not be determined by the date of their arrest or their ability to pay bail. Secretary of State Frank LaRose should ensure that all of Ohio’s 88 county boards of elections are prepared to assist all eligible voters who are arrested and held in pretrial detention prior to Election Day to ensure that they can cast a ballot.”
In his ruling, Watson said, “Ohio law does not disenfranchise someone until they are convicted of a felony, which is why the election scheme provides confined pretrial detainees and those convicted of a misdemeanor the opportunity to submit a request for an absentee ballot.”
The decision means all detainees in pre-trial holding can now receive an absentee ballot.
“A person does not lose the right to vote simply by being arrested, and the Court’s decision recognizes that a voter in jail receives the same protections as every other voter, and must be treated just like any other voter,” said Laura Bishop, voting rights project attorney at MacArthur Justice Center.
In The News
WASHINGTON (AP) — House Democrats passed sweeping voting and ethics legislation over unanimous Republican opposition, advancing to the Senate what would be the largest overhaul of the U.S. election law in at least a generation. House Resolution 1, which touches on virtually every aspect of the... Read More
WASHINGTON – All six conservative justices on the Supreme Court appeared inclined Tuesday to support voting restrictions imposed in Arizona that critics say discriminate against racial minorities. The case, Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (Consolidated), is one of the most watched of the current Supreme Court... Read More
WASHINGTON -- Democrats in Congress want to overhaul the nation’s voting laws with the “For the People Act” (H.R. 1). Their majority in the House makes approval of the bill likely as soon as this week. H.R. 1 would reduce barriers to voting by extending early... Read More
ATLANTA (AP) — Republican lawmakers in Georgia muscled legislation through the state House on Monday that would roll back voting access, over the objection of Democrats and civil rights groups gathered at the Capitol to protest. The bill comes after record turnout led to Democratic wins... Read More
ST. LOUIS – The city of St. Louis, Mo., will hold its mayoral primary Tuesday with a new electoral process approved by voters in November. Under the so-called “approval voting” regime, candidates of all political affiliations will appear on the ballot without partisan labels. The measure... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — As Congress begins debate this week on sweeping voting and ethics legislation, Democrats and Republicans can agree on one thing: If signed into law, it would usher in the biggest overhaul of U.S. elections law in at least a generation. House Resolution 1,... Read More