Counties Seek Protection of Local Decisions on Fed Autonomous Vehicles Rules
As Congressional lawmakers close in on finalizing a bipartisan, comprehensive bill governing the testing and deployment of autonomous vehicles, the nation’s county governments are reminding them not to forget to leave room for local decision-making.
In a blog post published this week, the National Association of Counties says while it does not have a specific policy on AV regulations, it supports a strong federal, state and local partnership as any federal legislation or regulation is developed.
“Counties must have strong federal partners to ensure the safe and efficient integration of this technology into our communities,” the association says.
Earlier this month, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce released seven sections of a draft bill, addressing cybersecurity, consumer education, inoperative controls, appropriations, personnel and staffing, crash data and the exclusion of trucks.
These sections were the result of a long process of attempting to reach bipartisan consensus on issues surrounding emerging AV technology.
The counties note that much of the legislative text within the newly released sections is still in brackets, meaning members are continuing to negotiate language for a final bill.
This comes several months after the committee released draft language for three other sections – exemptions, testing and evaluation and an AV advisory council – in October 2019. A section on rulemaking is still outstanding.
The association notes the draft bill comes in response to increased pressure from industry and stakeholders to provide a regulatory framework for the new, fast-developing industry.
However, efforts have failed in the past largely due to pressure from outside groups, including concerns about forced arbitration in previous versions of the framework.
For counties and other state and local governments, the main sticking point in negotiations continues to be the potential federal preemption of state and local regulations.
“State and local governments have raised concerns over provisions preempting states and localities from adopting laws, regulations and standards that would regulate many aspects of autonomous vehicles, including those that would impact safety,” the blog post says.
“Federal legislation that would preempt the ability of a county to regulate technology that has a direct impact on the safety of our residents and that also does not establish meaningful safety guidance itself can result in a safety vacuum where no one can act, resulting in unsafe, unregulated technology on our local roads,” the post continues. “Stakeholders are looking for language clarifying that state and local governments would not lose their traditional authority over traffic laws.”
In The News
WASHINGTON — A Trump-era regulation allowing the Department of Commerce to block technology-related business transactions determined to be national security threats will remain in place, against the wishes of some of the country's business stakeholders. The rule, scheduled to take effect this month, derives from a... Read More
WASHINGTON — As Beijing accelerates its plan to dominate in key information technology industries, U.S. policy experts are making the case for a new global governance body to curb the influence of techno-autocracies and create a like-minded alliance of techno-democracies instead. Much as the G-7 guides... Read More
Congress needs to create mandates to curb the abusive power exerted by a handful of online platforms, according to all six witnesses at a Capitol Hill hearing on Thursday. During the hearing, members of a House Judiciary subcommittee grappled with solutions to address the ability of... Read More
WASHINGTON -- Any policy aiming to truly address the nation’s broadband access crisis must be accompanied by robust federal funding to ensure these efforts are sustainable, according to one of the country’s top telecom executives. Speaking at the AT&T Policy Forum on Tuesday, John Stankey, the... Read More
Four panelists warned today that proposed legislative reforms for more aggressive antitrust enforcement in Big Tech would likely spill over across all industries, hindering innovation and harming consumers. Strengthening the antitrust laws - federal and state statutes that restrict the formation of monopolies and prohibit dominant... Read More
WASHINGTON - In the near future, cellular networks, particularly in advancing 5G, need to evolve away from their previously hardware-driven functions and become more virtual or software-based, the acting head of the Federal Communications Commissions believes. To advance those beliefs, FCC Acting Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel has... Read More