Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Affordable Care Act Appeal

March 2, 2020 by Dan McCue
The U.S. Supreme Court building, June 2019. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday granted petitions filed by the House and Democratic state officials to consider a lower court ruling that threatens to wipe out the Affordable Care Act.

The underlying case was brought by a Republican state official who argued that when Congress removed the Act’s requirement that the majority of Americans obtain health insurance, it also effectively rendered the law unconstitutional.

Democrats, worried about a potential change in the composition of the court, asked the justices to quickly intervene despite the fact several lower courts have yet to issue rulings on pending cases in their jurisdiction.

Not only do they want to bolster the law —  President Barack Obama’s signature achievement — but to also keep it in the public mind as voters across the United States go to the polls in their respective primaries.

That effort comes against a backdrop in which a federal judge in Texas has already ruled the entire Act was invalidated once the so-called “individual mandate” was removed. The judge stayed the ruling, pending appeals.

In December, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that the mandate was unconstitutional but declined to rule on the remainder of the Act, asking the lower court to reconsider the question in more detail.

The Democratically controlled states and the House asked the high court to place their appeal of that ruling on a fast track. However, in January, the court turned down that request.

In the alternative, the House and the Democratic states asked the court to hear the case on its regular schedule, arguing review is warranted because part of a federal law had been held to be unconstitutional.

They also argued the lower court rulings that have occurred create “problematic” uncertainty for individuals, businesses, and state and local governments who need to make important decisions based on their reliance on the Act.

In a statement, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, “The Affordable Care Act is an essential pillar of health and financial security for American families, and its protections are even more critical during a dangerous epidemic.” 

“But even in the middle of the coronavirus crisis, the Trump Administration continues to ask the court to destroy protections for people with pre-existing conditions and tear away health coverage from tens of millions of Americans,” she said.

Also commenting on Monday’s developments was Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, who said, “If the Supreme Court rules against the Affordable Care Act, tens of millions of people will lose their health insurance and patients will be unable to access the critical treatments and medicines they need.

“In short, there will be widespread uncertainty, and Republicans have no alternative plan to prevent chaos. This is not hyperbole, it is the reality that we as a country must brace for if Republicans win their extremely harmful case,” Neal said.

In response, the Trump administration contends the case isn’t ripe for Supreme Court review, “because the court of appeals did not definitively resolve any question of practical consequence.”

As is their custom, the Justices did not explain why they are taking up the case or when it will be heard.

It is likely it will be heard and decided in the spring of 2021.

“The sooner the GOP’s dangerous anti-health care lawsuit is ended, the better,” Pelosi said.  “Every day, the Affordable Care Act provides lifesaving protections and coverage for families across America.  Democrats will continue to fight in the courts and the Congress to defend and strengthen the Affordable Care Act and lower health costs for all Americans.”

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Deals Blow to Trump
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Deals Blow to Trump
February 22, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected an effort by former President Donald Trump to shield his income tax records from N.Y. prosecutors. The court’s action is the apparent culmination of a lengthy legal battle that had already reached the high court once before.... Read More

Biden Administration Asks Supreme Court to Uphold ACA
Supreme Court
Biden Administration Asks Supreme Court to Uphold ACA
February 11, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The White House on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court it believes the Affordable Care Act should be upheld, reversing the position taken by the Trump Administration. The justices heard oral arguments in November in multiple cases involving a group of Republican-led states attempting to... Read More

Supreme Court Tosses Emoluments Lawsuits Against Trump, Calling Them Moot
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Tosses Emoluments Lawsuits Against Trump, Calling Them Moot
January 25, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a pair of emoluments lawsuits against former President Donald Trump, ruling the cases are moot now that he's left office. The lawsuits were filed by the attorneys general for Maryland and Washington, D.C., and the government watchdog, Citizens... Read More

Supreme Court Allows Government to Enforce Abortion Pill Rule
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government to Enforce Abortion Pill Rule
January 13, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court lifted a nationwide injunction Tuesday that had prevented the federal government from enforcing a rule that required women to see a health care professional in person before she'd be given access to a so-called abortion pill. The Food and Drug... Read More

Supreme Court Rules Challenge to Trump Census Plan is Premature
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Rules Challenge to Trump Census Plan is Premature
December 18, 2020
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a challenge to President Donald Trump's plan to exclude people living in the country illegally from the population count as premature. Trump's insistence that illegal immigrants be excluded from the count could profoundly impact the number of seats... Read More

Supreme Court to Decide Whether NCAA Can Refuse Pay for Football and Basketball Stars
Sports
Supreme Court to Decide Whether NCAA Can Refuse Pay for Football and Basketball Stars

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Wednesday to decide whether major colleges and universities are violating federal antitrust laws by refusing to pay the football and basketball players who bring in hundreds of millions of dollars to their campuses. The National Collegiate Athletic Association and several... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top