Senate Confirms Amy Coney Barrett As Newest Supreme Court Justice
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate confirmed Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court Monday evening, marking the first time in 151 years that a justice was confirmed without the support of a single member of the minority party.
Shortly afterward, President Donald Trump held a swearing-in ceremony for Barrett before a mostly masked, socially-distanced crowd on the South Lawn of the White House.
“She is one of our nation’s most brilliant legal scholars, and she will make an outstanding justice on the highest court in our land,” Trump told those assembled.
Justice Clarence Thomas administered the oath to Judge Barrett, who chose him for the occasion.
Political analysts called Barrett’s appointment the Trump administration’s greatest victory only a week before an election in which the president trails in opinion polls.
Democrats tried to slow down a replacement for the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg until after the election. The Republican majority did not want to wait.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called Barrett’s nomination process a “cynical power grab” by Republicans.
He also said, “You will never, never get your credibility back.”
But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said before the 52-to-48 vote for confirmation, “The Senate is doing the right thing.”
The vote split solidly along party lines. Barrett was sworn in about an hour later.
The same divided sentiment between Republicans and Democrats was found among the roughly 60 demonstrators who gathered outside the Supreme Court in the hours leading to the Senate confirmation vote.
Barrett’s supporters and critics tried to shout each other down in a cacophony of barely understandable slogans and insults. Others held up competing signs while mildly bumping shoulders.
The supporters included representatives from Young America’s Foundation, a conservative public policy group representing mostly college students. They passed out signs with Barrett’s photo and a slogan that said, “Confirm Amy.”
Like Barrett, Young America’s Foundation opposes abortion and the Affordable Care Act, the two issues that drew the sharpest divisions between Republicans and Democrats during Senate nomination hearings last week.
Spencer Brown, a spokesman for the Reston, Va.-based group, said he would not describe Barrett as a conservative.
“I perceive her as being an originalist,” he told The Well News.
Barrett described herself in the same way during the Senate hearings. She said she would uphold the Constitution and federal laws, regardless of her personal beliefs.
“She’s not going to rule based on the whims of what the local mob says,” Brown said.
Competing signs from Barrett’s detractors said, “Keep your laws off our bodies” and “Republicans are packing the court. Vote them out.”
Some female protesters wore red robes with white bonnets to evoke women from the television series based on Margaret Atwood’s novel, The Handmaid’s Tale. It is set in a totalitarian society ruled by a fundamentalist regime that treats women as property of the state.
One of them was Katherine Johnson, a pipe welder from Raleigh, N.C., who threatened reprisal against senators who confirmed Barrett to the Supreme Court.
“Even if they get this win, it’s going to be short-lived for those senators,” Johnson told The Well News.
Barrett’s opponents soon would vote them out of office, she said. She also doubted Barrett’s pledge during Senate hearings to remain unbiased in her rulings.
“I don’t believe she can remain impartial while holding the views she has,” Johnson said.
In The News
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court should overturn its landmark 1973 ruling that legalized abortion nationwide and let states decide whether to regulate abortion before a fetus can survive outside the womb, the office of Mississippi's Republican attorney general argued in papers filed Thursday... Read More
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Supreme Court plans to hear a case in its next term that could expand rights of discrimination victims to collect compensation for "emotional distress." A ruling that allows the compensation could widely broaden the liability for discrimination, potentially allowing anyone victimized by... Read More
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a California law that required nonprofits to disclose lists of their biggest donors, holding the requirement burdened donors’ First Amendment rights and was not narrowly tailored to an important government interest. In a 6-3 ruling authored by... Read More
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Thursday to uphold two provisions of Arizona’s election law that critics argued unfairly impinged on the rights of Black, Hispanic and Native Americans voters. By a 6-3 margin, the justices held that a 2016 law that limits who can return... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday a company building a natural gas pipeline in New Jersey can continue to rely on eminent domain to claim state land in its path. The 5-4 ruling by the court included both liberal and conservative members of the court... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — A closely watched voting rights dispute from Arizona is among five cases standing between the Supreme Court and its summer break. But even before the justices wrap up their work, likely later this week, they could say whether they'll add more high-profile issues... Read More