4th Circuit Rules Against Trump in Emoluments Clause Case
WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court ruled against President Donald Trump on Thursday in a lawsuit alleging he’s violated the Constitution’s emoluments clause by profiting from foreign and state government patrons at his hotel in downtown Washington.
A divided 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused to dismiss the lawsuit, which was filed by the attorneys general from the District of Columbia and Maryland.
Writing for the majority in the 9-6 ruling, U.S. Circuit Judge Diana Motz said, “We recognize that the president is no ordinary petitioner, and we accord him great deference as the Executive branch.”
Nevertheless she continued, a majority of the appellate judges could not bring themselves to “grant the extraordinary relief the president seeks.”
Thursday’s ruling conflicts with a ruling handed down in March by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in a separate case, which barred individual members of Congress from suing the president over his private business.
After that ruling, Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., the plaintiffs in the case, decided not to request a rehearing by the full appeals court.
However, the split between the circuits very well could lead the Supreme Court to step in to decide the matter once and for all.
In the meantime, the case will return to a judge in Maryland, who has consistently ruled against Trump on preliminary legal questions, for further proceedings.
Trump opened the Trump International Hotel, on Pennsylvania Avenue just blocks from the White House, shortly before he was elected in November 2016. Unlike past presidents, he has retained ownership of numerous business interests, including the hotel, while serving as president.
D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine and Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh filed their lawsuit shortly after Trump took office. The 4th Circuit initially threw the lawsuit out, saying the attorneys general did not have legal standing to sue.
In December, all 15 judges in the circuit, which presides in Richmond, Virginia, reheard the case to decide whether the earlier three-judge panel hearing the case had erred in their determination.
Trump’s attorneys have maintained the president is not violating the emoluments clauses because the language bars only payments in exchange for official action or as part of an employment relationship.
Since the initial lawsuit, a federal judge in Maryland has signed off on more than a dozen subpoenas for Trump’s financial records to determine which government officials have stayed at Trump’s Washington hotel and how much they paid to stay there.
Those subpoenas have been on hold, pending the outcome of the president’s appeal.
In The News
A ruling by Britain's top court last week that said Royal Dutch Shell oil company could be liable in English courts for pollution by its subsidiary in Nigeria, is likely to expand the company’s potential liability abroad. The court’s decision also creates a likelihood of liability... Read More
NEW YORK (AP) — Acquitted by the Senate of inciting last month's U.S. Capitol insurrection, former President Donald Trump faces more fallout from the unrest, including a lawsuit from a congressman Tuesday. But his biggest legal problems might be the ones that go much further back.... Read More
Electronic voting systems operator Smartmatic is suing two of former President Donald Trump’s attorneys and Fox News cable network, claiming they defamed the company by accusing it of rigging the 2020 presidential election in favor of Joe Biden. The lawsuit filed in New York state court... Read More
WASHINGTON - The Justice Department is accusing SpaceX of stonewalling for information after a job applicant filed a complaint saying the rocket company discriminates against foreign citizens. U.S. attorneys said in a court filing last week that they subpoenaed documents about an applicant’s complaint but Space... Read More
Attorneys for a coalition of municipalities and advocacy groups that had sued the Trump administration over accuracy concerns about the 2020 census say they're hopeful about reaching an agreement with the new Biden administration as both sides take a more cooperative approach. Attorneys for the coalition... Read More
One could almost hear incumbent Rep. Anthony Brindisi sigh as he typed a tweet early last week. "Unfortunately, this is a long process," he said of the legal battle and ongoing ballot count that will ultimately decide the outcome of one of the 2020 election cycle's... Read More