Defense Dept. Official Sues to Get Answers on Suspension
WASHINGTON — A high-ranking Defense Department official sued in federal court in Washington, D.C. this week to determine why her security clearance still is suspended after five months.
The DOD has accused Katie Arrington of “unauthorized disclosure of classified information,” says her lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Arrington is on paid administrative leave after being chosen in 2019 to organize a cybersecurity program for government contractors.
She claims she has been “left dangling” about why she is being investigated. She suspects it is politically motivated.
“Nor did certain high-ranking DOD officials want the Plaintiff (Arrington) serving in a senior position within the Biden Administration due to her close previous ties with President Trump and they are using the [National Security Agency’s] decision as a pretext to remove her,” the lawsuit says.
It says “unknown individuals” in the Defense Department leaked private and defamatory information about her.
“Generally, these types of investigations would be expedited for senior officials,” the lawsuit says. In Arrington’s case, “the defendants are purposefully delaying or failing to take action in this matter in order to compel the plaintiff to resign.”
The DOD notified Arrington in a memo on May 11 that her security clearance was suspended. The next day, Arrington was told she was being put on paid administrative leave.
The memo did not give a detailed explanation. In addition, she says her repeated requests for information to the Defense Department, the National Security Agency and the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency went unanswered.
Arrington was hired as the Defense Department’s chief information security officer for acquisition and sustainment in 2019, months after an unsuccessful run for Congress. Her bio says she had 15 years working in cybersecurity for firms such as Booz Allen Hamilton.
Her lawsuit also alleges that suspending her security clearance appears to be an example of overkill by the Defense Department.
She acknowledged that the NSA removed her access to a small subset of information. However, she said it was not needed for her to do her cybersecurity work.
Arrington’s lawsuit claims violations of the Administrative Procedure Act and the Fifth Amendment, which she says should give her rights to a hearing that includes an explanation for a suspension or termination.
The lawsuit requests a court to order the DOD and NSA to complete their investigation. She also wants her attorney to be given information relevant to the case.
Although the Defense Department has declined to comment on the lawsuit, it comes at a time of heightened awareness of cyberattacks against the U.S. government.
Several bills are pending in Congress to improve the nation’s cybersecurity. Arrington was supposed to oversee a Defense Department program called Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, or CMMC.
It would require all defense contractors and subcontractors to meet minimum requirements for cybersecurity. They would be assessed before certification by government auditors.
The Defense Department plans to begin implementing the program this year, according to a White House Office of Management and Budget statement.
Nevertheless, at least one senior Pentagon cybersecurity official says the Defense Department is dragging its feet.
He resigned in frustration last month after alleging the Defense Department was unwilling to take adequate measures to match the threat from China.
Nicholas Chaillan became the U.S. Air Force chief software officer in 2018. Two years later, the departments of Defense, Treasury, State and Homeland Security were hit with the Russia-based SolarWinds cyberattack. Other hacking attacks are blamed on China.
Chaillan said on his LinkedIn page that the Defense Department has minimal chances of protecting against sophisticated Chinese cyberattacks without a more dedicated and well-funded effort.
Arrington’s lawsuit is Katherine Arrington v. Department of Defense et al., case number 1:21-cv-02669, in the U.S. District of Court for the District of Columbia.
Tom can be reached at [email protected].
In The News
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Justice announced Monday that it reached a settlement agreement with family members and survivors... Read More
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Justice announced Monday that it reached a settlement agreement with family members and survivors of the 2018 high school shooting in Parkland, Florida, that killed 17 people. Local media reports say the settlement amount is $130 million. A federal judge... Read More
WASHINGTON -- The Justice Department intervened this week in a lawsuit former President Donald Trump filed against social media companies... Read More
WASHINGTON -- The Justice Department intervened this week in a lawsuit former President Donald Trump filed against social media companies Facebook, Twitter and Google’s YouTube. Trump accuses the companies of violating his First Amendment right to free speech by banning his postings after the Jan. 6... Read More
SEATTLE — Testimony this week during a civil trial in Seattle could explain why opioid deaths set a record of... Read More
SEATTLE — Testimony this week during a civil trial in Seattle could explain why opioid deaths set a record of more than 100,000 in a year by last April. The class action lawsuit seeks $95 billion in damages against pharmaceutical companies that distribute the powerful painkillers.... Read More
WASHINGTON — The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will preside over all litigation stemming from the Biden administration’s decision... Read More
WASHINGTON — The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will preside over all litigation stemming from the Biden administration’s decision to require companies with at least 100 employees to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations or weekly testing, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation announced Tuesday. The conservative-leaning... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a case by a fast-food worker who claims employers have no... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a case by a fast-food worker who claims employers have no right to force arbitration on employees after first contesting the workers' lawsuits in pre-trial proceedings. The Taco Bell worker who sued said her franchisee in Iowa... Read More
GEORGETOWN, Del. — Dominion Voting Systems filed a new defamation lawsuit against Fox News Thursday, this one focusing on the... Read More
GEORGETOWN, Del. — Dominion Voting Systems filed a new defamation lawsuit against Fox News Thursday, this one focusing on the alleged roles of Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch and his son, Fox CEO and Executive Chairman Lachlan Murdoch in falsely accusing the company of rigging the... Read More