Supreme Court Staying Out of Steinbeck Family Dispute
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court declined to get involved in a long-running dispute among members of the late author John Steinbeck’s family, leaving in place a $5 million award to his stepdaughter.
The author of “Cannery Row,” “The Grapes of Wrath,” “East of Eden” and at least a dozen other books died in 1968 and his heirs have been fighting in and out of court ever since.
The dispute began after it turned out Steinbeck left most of his estate to his third wife, Elaine Steinbeck, and stipulated that future profits from his work go to her.
He left his two sons from a previous marriage, Thomas and John Steinbeck IV, about $50,000 each.
In 1983, a lawsuit stemming from the initial division of the estate was settled with Elaine, Thomas and John Steinbeck IV all sharing in the book royalties, but the author’s widow retaining full control over the exploitation of his works in film, on television or on the stage.
When Elaine Steinbeck died in 2003, her daughter, Waverly Scott Kaffaga, inherited the estate.
This immediately prompted Thomas Steinbeck and Blake Smyle, Steinbeck’s granddaughter to sue the estate arguing they had been deprived of their right to profit from the elder Steinbeck’s intellectual property.
The suit failed, but the bad blood in the family continued to fester.
Kaffaga sued Thomas Steinbeck and his wife Gail Knight Steinbeck, claiming that the couple had interfered with plans to develop new films from John Steinbeck’s novels and had hurt the estate financially.
Among these failed projects was a planned adaptation of “East of Eden” starring Jennifer Lawrence, and a remake of “The Grapes of Wrath” by Steven Spielberg.
After Thomas Steinbeck’s death, the legal battle between Kaffaga and Gail Steinbeck continued. Finally, in 2019, a jury in Los Angeles awarded Kaffaga $13 million in compensatory and punitive damages.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the compensatory damage award, but found the $7.9 million in punitive damages was “disproportionately large” compared to Gail Knight Steinbeck’s finances, which the panel said Kaffaga failed to accurately assess in her appellate briefs.
As is their custom, the justices did not explain their rationale for declining to hear the case.
In The News
CHARLESTON, S.C. - Charleston, S.C., is known for many things. Southern charm. Restaurants. Idyllic, Sun-soaked days. Being home to one of the nation’s busiest and most successful ports. But perhaps nothing brings more visitors to the city and the surrounding Lowcountry than the annual Spoleto Festival... Read More
This week Americans for the Arts, a leading arts advocacy nonprofit organization, is hosting the National Arts Action Summit, a virtual week-long summit that brings together arts advocates from around the country to hear from experts on arts policy, arts education and more. The summit is... Read More
WASHINGTON -- No one at a congressional hearing Thursday doubted the arts and humanities suffered severely during the COVID-19 pandemic. The question was how much longer the government should continue to bail them out with financial rescue grants. “We know that because of COVID-19, the arts... Read More
Simon Winchester has spent a lot of time thinking about land. As a student in his native Great Britain, he read geology at St. Catherine's College and, having become involved in the University Exploration Club, soon found himself a member of a six-man sledding expedition onto... Read More
WASHINGTON - There has probably never been a comprehensive tome on the American presidency quite like this one. Entitled "Wine and the White House: A History" and coming in at 456 pages, this new, elegant offering from the White House Historical Association is a tour de... Read More
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court declined to get involved in a long-running dispute among members of the late author John Steinbeck's family, leaving in place a $5 million award to his stepdaughter. The author of "Cannery Row," “The Grapes of Wrath,” "East of Eden" and at... Read More