Poll Shows a Majority of Voters Support Recycling Refund Programs
COMMENTARY

October 31, 2022by Stefan Hankin, President, Lincoln Park Strategies
Poll Shows a Majority of Voters Support Recycling Refund Programs
A loader moves waste and recyclables at Republic Services' recycling processing plant in the Gray's Ferry neighborhood of Philadelphia on July 17, 2018. (Maggie Loesch/Philly.com/TNS)

Recycling refund programs present an opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, create jobs and bolster the supply chain. No wonder 81% of voters support these programs.


It would not qualify as breaking news to say that America is divided. It’s obvious to anyone who consumes news or sits around the dinner table with family members. My work involves measuring public opinion on a variety of issues, so every day I see just how difficult it is to find policy ideas with strong, bipartisan public support.

So, the results of our recent nationwide poll of voters on recycling refund programs, also known as beverage container redemption programs, stood out to me and were both surprising and telling. A June 2022 poll of 1,000 adults conducted by Lincoln Park Strategies found that 81% of voters support recycling refund programs. In states where these programs already exist, support is even stronger, jumping to 90%.

What makes these numbers so instructive is that they prove it is still possible to have public policies that cut through all the partisan noise and garner strong support across the political spectrum. In this case, it is a program aimed at increasing the number of beverage containers that get recycled.

Recycling refund programs place a fully refundable deposit — usually five or 10 cents — on beverage containers made from different materials like aluminum, glass, plastics and others. Consumers pay the deposit at the time of purchase. Once they are done with the empty beverage containers, they can redeem them to obtain their refund.

A key reason why these kinds of programs have such strong bipartisan support is that they have a proven track record of incentivizing recycling, reducing litter and providing clean materials to serve as recycled content in new beverage containers. Currently, 10 states have active recycling refund programs, and generally, those states see higher recycling rates than states without these programs.

Returned containers help reduce litter and provide cleaner materials for manufacturers to use as recycled content in beverage containers. By increasing the domestic supply of recycled material for the containers people depend on, it reduces the use of new material, which in turn can help reduce carbon emissions. And by leading to more recycling, these programs also create more jobs than when beverage containers are landfilled.

Some of the key findings from our poll include that 72% of all respondents support the idea that these recycling refund programs should incentivize companies to use materials with high economic value. Seventy-two percent of Republicans polled, as well as 85% of Democrats, cited the role recycling and reusing beverage containers plays in lowering greenhouse gas emissions as a strong reason to support these programs. Respondents also cited encouraging more recycling, which creates more jobs than when items are sent to landfills, as a strong reason to support these programs. The poll found this reason garnered strong support from 75% of Republicans and 83% of Democrats.

While so many policy issues continue to divide the nation across partisan and ideological lines, the results of this poll show it is still possible for policies to break through the usual political disputes. The lesson here seems to be that it’s essential to have a policy that’s practical, easy to understand and with clear benefits. Recycling refund programs have a clear and successful track record, as is the case with the 10 states that already have these programs in place. It is clear there is broad support and momentum for instituting these types of programs. Time will tell if policymakers seize on the opportunity.


Stefan Hankin is president of the analytic research firm Lincoln Park Strategies. You can reach him on Twitter @LPStrategies.

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Opinions

Growing Economic Consensus That How We Value Medicines Must Change

Approaches to quantifying the value of novel medicines evolved rapidly in the past few decades due to improved methods and... Read More

Approaches to quantifying the value of novel medicines evolved rapidly in the past few decades due to improved methods and available data. But how do we estimate how much a medicine is worth? Strangely enough, that answer depends on where you are.  In the United States,... Read More

Response to Misinformation Piece on Comprehensive Harm Reduction Efforts  

In a March opinion piece in The Hill, Dr. Joanna Cohen contends that the concept of tobacco harm reduction is a... Read More

In a March opinion piece in The Hill, Dr. Joanna Cohen contends that the concept of tobacco harm reduction is a ruse by the tobacco industry, a cover for its “greed” to seek new customers and profits. This contention is based on two premises, that the industry... Read More

By Tweaking the IRA, This Legislation Could Save Lives

The impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on the price of medicine is starting to play out. Measures to cap... Read More

The impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on the price of medicine is starting to play out. Measures to cap the price of insulin at $35 a month for Medicare enrollees took effect on Jan. 1. In 2025, the IRA will cap annual out-of-pocket prescription drug... Read More

Community Mental Health Care Is on the Operating Table

Recent heated debates over Proposition 1 in California, which authorizes $6.38 billion for mental health treatment facilities, have put these centers... Read More

Recent heated debates over Proposition 1 in California, which authorizes $6.38 billion for mental health treatment facilities, have put these centers in the spotlight. Put simply, community mental health care is broken. Multiple states across the country have attempted and failed to reform these systems, and with 14%... Read More

Consensus Reached on Wildfire Prevention and Recovery Reforms: Urgent Congressional Action Needed

In Washington, D.C., where bipartisan consensus is hard to come by, the Wildland Fire Mitigation and Management Commission is a rare example... Read More

In Washington, D.C., where bipartisan consensus is hard to come by, the Wildland Fire Mitigation and Management Commission is a rare example of serious policy in place of strained politics.  With growing recognition of the increased risk to Americans from more frequent and damaging wildfires, Congress established the... Read More

To Stop a Bad Guy With an App, You Need a Good Guy With an App Store

Nearly everyone has an opinion on whether the United States should force a TikTok ban over national security concerns. Voters support a... Read More

Nearly everyone has an opinion on whether the United States should force a TikTok ban over national security concerns. Voters support a ban, Trump opposes a ban and Biden just signed Congress’ divestment bill. Everyone from security hawks to tech experts to “suburbanites” have weighed in. But what gets lost in the debate over the national... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top