“Trust Us” – Exposing Huawei’s Influence Playbook in the COVID Era
COMMENTARY

April 16, 2020 by Craig Singleton
“Trust Us” – Exposing Huawei’s Influence Playbook in the COVID Era

As COVID-19 wreaks havoc around the world, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its media surrogates have turned to a familiar messaging playbook to manipulate the narrative surrounding the outbreak, one well-steeped in disinformation, denial, and deceit.

As phrases like “deep fakes” and “bot farms” have recently become mainstays of our lexicon, it is easy to overlook the less sophisticated ways foreign adversaries are attempting to influence our way of life. Yes, efforts by Russia to weaponize social media platforms deserve our attention, particularly in the lead up to the election, but there are far simpler and more effective ways that foreign countries, particularly China, are seeking to influence American public opinion. One need look no further than the ongoing battle with Huawei and the future of 5G to truly understand how far China is willing to go to win the battle of ideas.

The national security concerns about Huawei’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and People’s Liberation Army (PLA), as well as its predatory business model, have been well-documented. For its part, the U.S. government has taken decisive legal action against Huawei, as evidenced by the pending extradition case involving Huawei’s CFO, Meng Wanzhou. Not one to take these setbacks lying down, the CCP has launched an aggressive, worldwide campaign to defend Huawei’s interests and undermine the United States’ credibility, all the while falsely championing the technology giant as a reliable, low-cost alternative to its Western rivals.

Already, there are troubling indications that Huawei’s strategy appears to be paying off, particularly in its campaign to gain access to national 5G networks. Perhaps more worrisome, the U.S. government’s messaging campaign appears to be falling on deaf ears, as even some of our closest allies have refused to ban Huawei in its entirety.

In countries like Australia, where our efforts to limit Huawei’s access initially prevailed, China is now ramping up efforts to overturn that ban. In an attempt to take its case directly to the Australian people, Huawei has hired former Australian government officials to lobby on its behalf, launched a series of town-hall meetings called “Let’s Talk Huawei,” publicly attacked its detractors, and even used sports team sponsorship to win over the population. While Western companies would never be allowed to conduct anything approaching this level of influence in China, Huawei is expertly leveraging the West’s open systems to improve its own fortune.

We are hardly immune to the influence campaign plaguing our friends down under. Here in Washington, Huawei has hired former senior U.S. officials, including Andy Purdy, to leverage their relationships inside and outside of government to lobby on the company’s behalf. Huawei also recently ran a series of targeted advertisements in an attempt to derail a Congressional bill aimed at preventing the company from investing in rural networks. Perhaps more troubling, recent statements by Huawei and the CCP in the United States, as well as in France, Germany, and the U.K., have bordered on threatening, warning of the economic consequences of “unfairly” discriminating against the 5G behemoth. Just this week, Huawei’s Chairman warned the U.S. to expect countermeasures from the Chinese government if it further restricted Huawei’s access to suppliers, as the company’s profit last year grew at the slowest pace in three years.

These brutish tactics are hardly occurring in a vacuum, as China regularly cultivates relationships with academics and business leaders in a wide range of sectors to further its agenda. Taken together, these tactics represent China’s long-game approach to influencing public opinion and creating a new world order in which the United States and our allies are beholden to the People’s Republic.

Confronting this modern-day challenge will require significantly strengthening partnerships between federal and state governments, to include appropriately resourcing entities charged with enforcing existing laws aimed at exposing foreign influence. These efforts should also include drafting common-sense legislation designed to close the disinformation loopholes companies like Huawei and their foreign government-backers are currently weaponizing. A proposed, bipartisan Senate bill represents an excellent first step in this regard and members of the House would be wise to adopt similar legislation.

Additional measures could include amplifying language contained in Executive Order 13770 and 18 U.S.C. § 207 governing the ability of former senior U.S. government officials to accept employment with foreign state-owned enterprises or other companies deemed a national security risk, as well as the creation of state-level systems akin to the Foreign Agent Reporting Act to track influence agents operating at the state-level.

China’s attempts to manipulate public perceptions about the coronavirus are a symptom of a much larger disease. While developing a vaccine for COVID may take months, there is no reason we cannot inoculate ourselves now from the next outbreak of Chinese interference.

Craig Singleton is a national security expert and former diplomat who served under the Bush, Obama, and Trump administrations.

A+
a-

In The News

Health

Voting

Opinions

Growing Economic Consensus That How We Value Medicines Must Change

Approaches to quantifying the value of novel medicines evolved rapidly in the past few decades due to improved methods and... Read More

Approaches to quantifying the value of novel medicines evolved rapidly in the past few decades due to improved methods and available data. But how do we estimate how much a medicine is worth? Strangely enough, that answer depends on where you are.  In the United States,... Read More

Response to Misinformation Piece on Comprehensive Harm Reduction Efforts  

In a March opinion piece in The Hill, Dr. Joanna Cohen contends that the concept of tobacco harm reduction is a... Read More

In a March opinion piece in The Hill, Dr. Joanna Cohen contends that the concept of tobacco harm reduction is a ruse by the tobacco industry, a cover for its “greed” to seek new customers and profits. This contention is based on two premises, that the industry... Read More

By Tweaking the IRA, This Legislation Could Save Lives

The impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on the price of medicine is starting to play out. Measures to cap... Read More

The impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on the price of medicine is starting to play out. Measures to cap the price of insulin at $35 a month for Medicare enrollees took effect on Jan. 1. In 2025, the IRA will cap annual out-of-pocket prescription drug... Read More

Community Mental Health Care Is on the Operating Table

Recent heated debates over Proposition 1 in California, which authorizes $6.38 billion for mental health treatment facilities, have put these centers... Read More

Recent heated debates over Proposition 1 in California, which authorizes $6.38 billion for mental health treatment facilities, have put these centers in the spotlight. Put simply, community mental health care is broken. Multiple states across the country have attempted and failed to reform these systems, and with 14%... Read More

Consensus Reached on Wildfire Prevention and Recovery Reforms: Urgent Congressional Action Needed

In Washington, D.C., where bipartisan consensus is hard to come by, the Wildland Fire Mitigation and Management Commission is a rare example... Read More

In Washington, D.C., where bipartisan consensus is hard to come by, the Wildland Fire Mitigation and Management Commission is a rare example of serious policy in place of strained politics.  With growing recognition of the increased risk to Americans from more frequent and damaging wildfires, Congress established the... Read More

To Stop a Bad Guy With an App, You Need a Good Guy With an App Store

Nearly everyone has an opinion on whether the United States should force a TikTok ban over national security concerns. Voters support a... Read More

Nearly everyone has an opinion on whether the United States should force a TikTok ban over national security concerns. Voters support a ban, Trump opposes a ban and Biden just signed Congress’ divestment bill. Everyone from security hawks to tech experts to “suburbanites” have weighed in. But what gets lost in the debate over the national... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top