Trump Says He’ll Reject U.S. Intelligence Assessments He Disagrees With
February 4, 2019
WASHINGTON — Despite growing foreign-policy misgivings about him even within the Republican Party, President Donald Trump insisted in an interview aired Sunday that he feels free to ignore the assessments of his intelligence chiefs and instead act on his own beliefs.
In the interview on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” the president also appeared to soften his claim that the senior intelligence officials who testified before Congress last week subsequently told him that their views had been distorted in news reports.
Their televised testimony contradicted Trump’s positions on a variety of subjects and was followed by scathing presidential Twitter attacks on those same officials.
“I have intel people, but that doesn’t mean I have to agree,” he said in the interview. He cited past U.S. intelligence mistakes regarding Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction and what he seemed to suggest was their underestimating now of the threat posed by Iran.
“So when my intelligence people tell me how wonderful Iran is, if you don’t mind, I’m going to just go by my own counsel,” he said.
Although the White House has suggested that Tuesday’s prime-time State of the Union speech — delayed for a week by the 35-day partial government shutdown — will be bipartisan in nature, Trump took a combative tone in the CBS interview.
He denounced House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., as a danger to the nation and said he doesn’t rule out another shutdown or an emergency declaration to try to get his way on a border wall.
“I don’t take anything off the table,” he said. He added that there have been “plenty of national emergencies called” in the past and suggested he might brush aside predictions that such a declaration would face a speedy court challenge.
Trump said Pelosi, who will sit behind him as he delivers his address to a joint session of Congress, is “doing a terrible disservice to our country” on border security.
“She can keep playing her games, but we will win,” he said.
Pelosi and her House Democrats forced an end to the shutdown after refusing to yield to Trump’s demand for $5.7 billion in funding for his desired wall. The president has since spoken dismissively of bipartisan negotiations aimed at finding areas of agreement on border security and immigration policy.
Trump’s public excoriation of his senior intelligence appointees last week – he called them “naive” and said they needed to “go back to school” — came as unease grows in Republican ranks over White House foreign policy decisions viewed by some as impetuous and poorly thought out.
In hours of testimony Tuesday, intelligence leaders including Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and CIA Director Gina Haspel said North Korea was unlikely to give up its nuclear weapons, stated that Iran is for the most part in compliance with the nuclear accord that Trump spurned and described the militants of Islamic State as a potent regional menace.
They also pointedly refrained from describing the situation on the southern border as a security threat, as the president has repeatedly characterized it.
In the intervening days, not only Democrats but also some senior Republicans have said that disregarding nonpartisan intelligence assessments is a perilous path for any president.
The latest such admonition came from Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., who chairs the Senate Committee on Homeland Security. On “Fox News Sunday,” he urged Trump to pay close attention to the intelligence community’s counsel.
“You have to rely on people who have been working these issues for decades,” Johnson said. He called it “just imperative that you actually listen to, for example, the CIA chief, the director of national intelligence.”
The Senate voted Thursday to rebuke Trump over his abrupt decision, absent any congressional hearings or consultation with allies, to pull U.S. military forces from Afghanistan and Syria. In the CBS interview, however, the president played down those concerns.
On Syria, he said, “you now have very little ISIS,” using an acronym for Islamic State. Regarding Afghanistan, he said, “I want to bring people home,” and questioned whether the U.S.-led invasion after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks should have taken place.
And when asked about the potential resurgence of terrorist groups like al-Qaida in the Middle East, Trump said U.S. forces could always go back if needed. “We have very fast airplanes; we have very good cargo planes,” he said.
The president responded with a measure of sarcasm in disagreeing with intelligence assessments of Iran’s compliance with the nuclear agreement. “My intelligence people, if they said in fact that Iran is a wonderful kindergarten, I disagree with them 100 percent,” he said.
Trump did appear to back down slightly on his depiction of an Oval Office encounter last week with the intelligence chiefs after their congressional appearance. He said at the time that the officials had been “misquoted” in media reports, although their testimony was carried on live television.
“I’m not going to stop them from testifying,” he said. “They said they were mischaracterized — maybe they were, maybe they weren’t. I don’t really know.”
Turning to the Russia investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller, Trump fell back on familiar descriptions of the inquiry as a “witch hunt.” He said he would let the attorney general decide whether Mueller’s report would be released to the public.
He sidestepped a question about whether he would pardon Roger Stone, his longtime confidant who was arrested in an FBI raid and last week pleaded not guilty to seven charges related to the Russia investigation.
“I have not thought about it,” Trump said of pardon prospects for Stone. “It looks like he’s defending himself very well.”
©2019 Los Angeles Times
Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
In The News
(This is the fourth and final part of a four-part series. The first three parts can be read here, here and here.) The First Amendment Prevails The Supreme Court’s decision in the Pentagon Papers case, officially, New York Times Co. v. United States, affirmed historical precedents... Read More
(This is the third part of a four-part series. The first and second installments can be read here and here.) White House Makes Its Move Ultimately, the decision to seek prior restraint -- an injunction prohibiting The Times from publishing future articles -- was made by... Read More
The Biden Administration announced Monday it will interpret federal non-discrimination provisions as protecting the LGBTQ community against discrimination in health care. The move, which was announced through the Department of Health and Human Services, means the Office for Civil Rights will interpret and enforce Section 1557... Read More
(This is the second part of a four-part series. The first installment can be read here.) To Publish or Not to Publish Upon his return to Washington, Sheehan and an editor booked a room at the Jefferson Hotel, where they spent weeks reading and summarizing the... Read More
WASHINGTON — While much has been studied about President Biden’s first 100 days in office, most of that analysis has focused on how the administration’s actions impact American citizens or relationships with the world’s other great powers, but many wonder about how early actions will affect... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — Eager to the turn the page on the Trump years, the Biden White House is launching an effort to unearth past problems with the politicization of science within government and to tighten scientific integrity rules for the future. A new 46-person federal scientific... Read More