White House Stiff-Arms House Judiciary Committee on Russia Investigation
WASHINGTON — The White House hardened its opposition to House Democrats’ investigations Wednesday, telling lawmakers that they had no authority to examine how President Donald Trump has wielded his executive authority.
The stance stiffens Trump’s already obdurate approach toward Capitol Hill, and it represents an expansive view of how presidents can stonewall congressional requests for documents or testimony from administration officials.
“The Committee’s inquiries transparently amount to little more than an attempt to duplicate — and supplant — law enforcement inquiries, and apparently to do so simply because the actual law enforcement investigations conducted by the Department of Justice did not reach a conclusion favored by some members of the Committee,” Pat Cipollone, the top White House lawyer, wrote in a letter to Rep. Jerrold Nadler, the New York Democrat who chairs the House Judiciary Committee.
The argument paralleled one that Trump’s personal lawyers made earlier this week in court in an effort to block subpoenas of Trump’s financial records. They also argued that Congress could not pursue investigations that replicated “law enforcement” inquiries. The federal judge appeared skeptical of the argument, saying that such a rule would have blocked congressional investigations of the Watergate scandal.
House Democrats have been trying to build on the Russia investigation led by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III by probing whether Trump obstructed justice or otherwise abused his power. But the White House has refused to cooperate on that inquiry or in others into the president’s tax returns and the granting of security clearances.
“Based on the sheer number and scope of the Committee’s requests, it is clear that the Committee is trying to unduly burden the Office of the President so as to impair the President’s ability to carry out his constitutional duties,” Cipollone’s letter said. “The Constitution does not permit Congress to undermine the President in this manner.”
In his 448-page report, Mueller laid out several instances in which Trump tried to impede the Russia investigation. However, he did not reach a conclusion on whether Trump violated the law — in part because Justice Department rules prevent sitting presidents from being indicted.
Attorney General William Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said the evidence did not show that Trump committed a crime. With the special counsel’s investigation over, the White House accused Democrats of trying to repeat Mueller’s work without a legitimate purpose.
“Congressional investigations are intended to obtain information to aid in evaluating potential legislation, not to harass political opponents or to pursue an unauthorized ‘do-over’ of exhaustive law enforcement investigations conducted by the Department of Justice,” Cipollone wrote.
Nadler responded by telling reporters that the White House was trying to make the president invulnerable to any kind of oversight.
“They say the Justice Department can’t hold him accountable since a sitting president can’t be indicted,” he said. “Now they’re saying the Congress can’t hold a president accountable. This is ridiculous. It would make the president above the law.”
Nadler said Democrats may seek “very large” fines against people held in contempt of Congress for failing to comply with subpoenas. The House Judiciary Committee has already recommended contempt for Barr for refusing to provide lawmakers with an un-redacted copy of the Mueller report, but the matter has not yet reached the House floor.
Democratic congressional leaders have suggested that more administration officials could face contempt. The House may hold one vote on all of them together next month.
Nadler said Democrats will not be deterred from pursuing their investigations, which include taking testimony from Mueller and Donald McGahn, Trump’s first White House counsel and a key witness. Trump has said neither should testify.
“We will subpoena whoever we have to subpoena,” Nadler said. “We will hear from Mueller. We will hear from McGahn. We will hear from a lot of other witnesses. We will hold in contempt whoever doesn’t comply with subpoenas.”
Nadler’s political opponents have sharply criticized his leadership. Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said that the panel “has become a parody.”
“When the results of Robert Mueller’s investigation did not satisfy Democrats, they quickly started peddling to the American people a manufactured ‘constitutional crisis,’” he said.
Wednesday’s letter is only one way in which Trump has resisted congressional probes. The president made a preliminary assertion of executive privilege over the un-redacted Mueller report and the underlying evidence. The decision allows his team more time to review the materials before making a more definitive assessment.
The legal principle of executive privilege allows presidents to keep secret their communications with advisers, and the Russia investigation relied heavily on prosecutors’ interviews with White House aides.
Times staff writers Jennifer Haberkorn, Eli Stokols and Sarah D. Wire contributed to this report.
©2019 Los Angeles Times
Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
In The News
WASHINGTON - The Library of Congress may be closed due to the coronavirus, but its manuscript division has just added the digitized papers of three presidents to its online collection. The presidencies of each of the men, Andrew Johnson, Chester A. Arthur, and William McKinley all... Read More
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s new chief of staff, Mark Meadows, has escalated tensions in the White House with a swift series of staff changes that have drawn complaints from some in the West Wing about his management style, according to people familiar with the matter.... Read More
PHILADELPHIA — When Deborah Birx told classmates at Carlisle High School that she planned to compete in the local science fair, some laughed. It was the early 1970s, and Birx was a pretty girl with a bubbly personality. She waitressed after school at a Carlisle drive-in... Read More
WASHINGTON — Democrats saw warning signs long before President Donald Trump nominated Neomi Rao to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. At the time, she was a White House lawyer who zealously defended Trump’s agenda. She’d clerked for Supreme Court Justice... Read More
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump issued a pardon Tuesday to Michael Milken, the disgraced former junk bond king who later became a prominent Los Angeles philanthropist, in a mass clemency to 11 convicted felons that marked a dramatic expansion of the president’s intervention in judicial matters... Read More
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s declaration last month that climate change is a “serious subject” marked the completion of a yearlong shift away from his outright denial of the global threat — a shift, according to one former aide, driven by 2020 politics. William Happer, one... Read More