Wary of ‘Medicare for All,’ Democrats Seek Easier Paths to Universal Coverage

May 14, 2019by Noam N. Levey

WASHINGTON — Wary of the political risks and practical difficulties of “Medicare for All” proposals that would move every American into a government health plan, Democrats increasingly are embracing more modest plans to use Medicare to expand insurance coverage.

This strategy — backed by former Vice President Joe Biden as well as other Democratic presidential hopefuls and leading members of Congress — would give Americans the option to sign up for Medicare, the half-century-old government plan currently reserved for the elderly and disabled.

But it would not mandate government coverage, effectively allowing Americans to retain their current commercial health plans.

Even this more incremental approach marks a significant leftward shift by Democrats: A decade ago, during the Obama administration, party lawmakers eschewed such an expansion when they passed the Affordable Care Act, often called Obamacare.

It stops well short, however, of the more expansive Medicare-for-all plan that Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has made a central plank of his 2020 presidential campaign.

The debate over how to expand health coverage has highlighted the most significant policy difference so far among the many people seeking the Democratic presidential nomination.

Although it’s too soon to know how the issue will be resolved, expanding Medicare choice seems to be emerging as the preferred strategy — supplanting Medicare for All, which just months ago looked to be a litmus test for Democratic candidates.

Sanders remains committed to Medicare for All, and he and his allies on the left wing of the Democratic Party dismiss more limited proposals as inadequate to address the health care affordability crisis faced by tens of millions of Americans.

“We need a president who will not back down until every American is guaranteed health care as a human right, period,” said Josh Orton, a senior adviser on the Sanders campaign.

Many on the left warn that compromising on Medicare for All would repeat what they see as the mistake Democrats made in 2010, when they settled on a centrist solution for expanding coverage in hopes of winning support from Republicans and centrist Democrats. The GOP instead spent the last decade trying to overturn Obamacare.

Four of the Democratic senators seeking the presidential nomination have endorsed Sanders’ bill proposing Medicare for All: Cory Booker of New Jersey, Kamala Harris of California, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.

Booker and Harris, however, appear to have backed away from the plan in recent months, saying that although they support Medicare for All, they do not want to eliminate private insurance.

And Warren, despite her embrace of many liberal positions, has assiduously avoided being tied too closely to Medicare for All, saying at a CNN town hall in March that she’s open to “different pathways” to achieve universal coverage.

When he kicked off his campaign two weeks ago, Biden told a crowd in Pittsburgh that he believed Medicare should be a “choice” for people unhappy with their current coverage.

That approach reflects the political and logistical challenges of moving to a so-called single-payer system.

“‘Medicare for All’ sounds like something that would be very popular,” said former California Rep. Henry Waxman, a liberal Democrat who over four decades in Congress championed multiple expansions in coverage, including the 2010 health care law.

“The problem is that many don’t realize the flaws of making Medicare the only choice.”

The growing recognition of the difficulties has been underscored by polls showing that, although Medicare for All remains popular in the abstract, many Americans are leery of the potential trade-offs.

A survey earlier this year by the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation, for example, found that support for a single government plan fell from 56% to 37% when respondents were told that such a plan might involve eliminating private insurance companies or requiring more taxes. The foundation has no affiliation with the Kaiser Permanente health plan.

Making Medicare an option out-polled Medicare for All 74% to 56% in the Kaiser poll.

Another national poll, by Morning Consult, found supporters of Medicare for All were as likely to put a top priority on having Congress create an optional government plan for Americans as they were to say Medicare for All should be the top priority.

These results are not surprising, said Celinda Lake, a longtime Democratic pollster. “Medicare for All has transitioned from a goal to an actual policy,” she said. “The conversation has become more real.”

In addition to worrying voters who have employer-based coverage, the push for Medicare for All has also concerned elderly Americans, many of whom see it as potentially threatening to their own Medicare coverage.

The Trump administration and its congressional allies have tried to capitalize on those fears in recent months, working to undercut the political advantage that Democrats have enjoyed on health care since Republicans undertook their unpopular effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky routinely refers to Sanders’ plan as Medicare for none, and President Trump has made repeated efforts to use the Medicare-for-all initiative and other Democratic policy ideas to tag the party as socialists.

Although Biden, the early front-runner, and other Democratic presidential contenders have yet to detail their preferred alternatives to Sanders’ Medicare for All bill, one possible blueprint is contained in legislation sponsored by two liberal House Democrats that would expand Medicare eligibility while preserving the current system of job-based coverage that most working Americans rely on.

The Medicare for America bill — co-authored by Reps. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., and Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., in concert with the Center for American Progress — contains ambitious provisions to fold Medicaid and other government programs into Medicare. It has 16 co-sponsors, including Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., a top adviser to the Sanders campaign. Khanna signed onto the bill last week. Former Rep. Beto O’Rourke also backs their proposal.

Schakowsky, who also backs Medicare for All as a goal, stressed that the two approaches were not incompatible.

“Medicare for America is still a bold plan. It just may not be as threatening,” she said. “And we would get to test out a lot of things that could be applicable if we go to Medicare for All.”

More immediately, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is urging Democrats to focus on strengthening the current health care law, a move that is broadly popular and has spurred Republicans to remain on the defense politically.

House Democrats this week plan to advance a series of bills to reverse the Trump administration’s efforts to undermine the 2010 law.

———

©2019 Los Angeles Times

Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Health

New Dems Urge House Leadership to Move Bipartisan Drug Pricing Bills Health
New Dems Urge House Leadership to Move Bipartisan Drug Pricing Bills
July 17, 2019
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - Members of the New Democrat Coalition's Healthcare Task Force asked the House leadership on Wednesday to hold a floor vote on drug pricing bills with bipartisan support as early as next week. The request was made in a letter sent to House Speaker Nancy... Read More

California Doesn’t Have Enough Doctors. To Recruit Them, It's Paying Off Med School Debt State News
California Doesn’t Have Enough Doctors. To Recruit Them, It's Paying Off Med School Debt

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Bryan Ruiz’s hands were still shaking an hour after he learned the $300,000 in medical school loans he took out to become a dentist were being wiped away by California taxpayers. A year out of medical school, Ruiz thought it would take decades... Read More

Despite Federal Protections, Rape Victims Still Get Billed for Forensic Exams Health
Despite Federal Protections, Rape Victims Still Get Billed for Forensic Exams

Six years ago, Erin was a newly minted graduate of the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, working three part-time jobs and adjusting to life as a non-student. She stopped in for a drink one night at a restaurant in Chicago’s Bucktown neighborhood, where she... Read More

‘Staggering’ Number of Children Exposed to Violence in Chicago, New Study Says In The News
‘Staggering’ Number of Children Exposed to Violence in Chicago, New Study Says

CHICAGO — Over the Fourth of July holiday, Felix Kombwa brought the children he mentors to a festival where a law-enforcement exhibit allowed visitors to sit in a squad car, try on police gear and chat with officers. But the fireworks, the presence of the officers... Read More

Pelosi: Extra Veterans Health Care Funds Needed in Debt Deal Veterans
Pelosi: Extra Veterans Health Care Funds Needed in Debt Deal

WASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wrote to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on Saturday pressing for added funds to help veterans see private doctors as part of any deal to raise the debt ceiling and tight appropriations caps. Pelosi’s letter opens a new front in the... Read More

House Overwhelmingly Approves 9/11 Victims Bill Congress
House Overwhelmingly Approves 9/11 Victims Bill
July 12, 2019
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The House overwhelmingly approved a bill Friday ensuring that a victims compensation fund for first responders to the Sept. 11 attacks never runs out of money. Following the 402-12 vote, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said the permanent extension of the 9/11 Victims’... Read More

Straight From The Well
scroll top