Wisconsin Supreme Court Agrees to Consider Slashing 129K from Voting Rolls
The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a case that could remove about 129,000 people from the state’s voter rolls ahead of the November election.
This is the second time the state’s highest court considered hearing the case, having previously deadlocked on whether to take it or not.
The case stems from a letter the Wisconsin Elections Commission sent to about 230,000 voters in October 2019, indicating officials believed those people may have moved from their current address.
Since then, about 62,000 of those voters have either verified their address did not change or registered to vote at a new address.
Another 41,600 have been deemed ineligible to vote for a variety of reasons and struck from the battleground state’s voter rolls.
But that left about 129,000 voters who have not updated their voting records and the question is whether to remove them from the active voter rolls.
State Circuit Judge Paul Malloy, presiding in Ozaukee County, Wis., ordered the state to remove the missing voters from the roll, giving them just 30 days to do so.
“I don’t want to see someone deactivated, but I don’t write the law,” Malloy said.
The state Court of Appeals put that ruling on hold in January and eventually overturned the decision when it ruled in February that the voters should not be removed.
That led to a state Supreme Court hearing on whether to take up the case, but there was a hitch. The court has seven justices, and one of them, a conservative named Dan Kelly, recused himself on the grounds that he was on the ballot in the April election.
The remaining justices split 3-3, and there the case stood until April, when Kelly said he would participate in the case once again because his election was over.
It’s not clear whether the Wisconsin Supreme Court will rule before the August 11 primary or the November 3 general election.
The court’s order set a period of up to 60 days for briefs to be filed in the case and it’s possible oral arguments could be scheduled later this summer or early in the fall.
But that sets up another wrinkle in the case.
Kelly lost his election and is to be replaced by Jill Karofski, a liberal judge.
When Karofsky takes the bench, conservatives will have a 4-3 majority, rather than the 5-2 majority they currently hold.
If the court were to rule that those voters should be removed from active rolls, they could re-register either by mail, online, at a clerk’s office or at the polls on Election Day.
But some voting rights activists have expressed concerns about difficulty for some people to register to vote amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
“We are pleased the Wisconsin Supreme Court has agreed to hear this critical case,” said Rick Esenberg, president and general counsel of Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, which filed the lawsuit last year. “Recent months have made clear that state agencies, like the Wisconsin Elections Commission, must be held accountable when they ignore state law.”
The Wisconsin Democratic Party, meanwhile, has vowed to fight for the unaccounted for voters.
In a statement the party said, “We will continue to use every tool at our disposal to fight back against these attacks on our democracy and ensure every Wisconsinite is able to vote safely in November.”
In The News
DETROIT — President Donald Trump's campaign filed a second lawsuit in Michigan on Tuesday seeking to stop the state's canvassing and certification of ballots, but the state's chief elections official and attorney general defended the election results. The Trump campaign filed the case in federal court, where the campaign is alleging... Read More
WASHINGTON — Attorney General William Barr authorized Justice Department officials to open inquiries into potential irregularities in the presidential election, while acknowledging there's no conclusive evidence. Barr issued a memo on Monday evening authorizing U.S. attorneys across the country, as well as his top lieutenants, "to pursue substantial allegations of voting and vote... Read More
LOS ANGELES — A federal judge harshly criticized the U.S. Postal Service on Wednesday, saying the agency had failed to comply with his order to sweep postal facilities for leftover mail-in ballots in battleground states where election officials continue to count votes. Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of Washington, D.C., also ordered postal... Read More
Kristen Clarke, president of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said Tuesday that the election so far appears to be successful in terms of in-person voting despite some isolated incidents. Voters at on Missouri polling location were asked about their COVID testing status, Clarke said, and at... Read More
WASHINGTON — Donald Trump survived a scare in Texas, though Election Day ended without a verdict on whether his tumultuous presidency will continue for another term — or the huge blue wave that Joe Biden's supporters had hoped for. The former vice president held a substantial lead in national polls before the polls opened... Read More
The scourge of a global pandemic produced an election season like no other in the U.S., persuading record numbers of Americans to cast their ballots early, forcing states to make changes to long-established election procedures and leading to hundreds of lawsuits over how votes will be... Read More