Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds Mail-In Voting Expansion

August 5, 2022 by Dan McCue
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds Mail-In Voting Expansion
A voter drops off his mail ballot for the 2022 Pennsylvania primary elections in Newtown Square, Pa., on May 2. (Matt Rourke/Associated Press)

HARRISBURG, Pa. — A Pennsylvania mail-in voting law that greatly expanded the population eligible to vote that way has survived a legal challenge before the state’s Supreme Court.

In a 5-2 ruling handed down Tuesday, the Democratic majority on the court overturned a lower court ruling from January that said Pennsylvania’s Act 77 violated the state constitution.

As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision, all voters in the key swing state will be able to cast ballots by mail in November and in all future state and federal elections.

“We find no restriction in our constitution on the General Assembly’s ability to create universal mail-in voting,” Justice Christine Donohue wrote in the majority opinion.

Act 77 passed with strong bipartisan support in 2019, but it has been a bone of contention among Republicans ever since the November 2020 presidential election.

The irony of the legal challenge was that it was brought by many of the same Republican state lawmakers who voted in favor of the legislation just three years ago.

After the Republican-controlled lower court threw out the legislation, Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf appealed the case on the grounds the judges had based their rulings on older versions of the state constitution that had invalidated earlier attempts to expand absentee voting.

Attorneys for the governor argued that the state constitution only establishes a minimum requirement for absentee voting — a floor, if you will — but does not bar steps taken to go beyond those minimums.

As an example, they pointed out that military spouses have been allowed to vote absentee and with mail-in ballots for years, despite the fact nothing in the state constitution specifically makes that allowance.

Despite the state Supreme Court’s ruling, litigation over Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballot continues. Last month, 14 Republican state lawmakers filed yet another attempt to get the law tossed.

The new complaint points to a separate provision of the state constitution that states a law will become void as soon as any of its requirements are struck down by a court.

The lawmakers contend the so-called “non-severability” provision was triggered in May by a ruling in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The underlying case stemmed from a judicial election last year, in which mail-in ballots were challenged due to their not being embossed with a handwritten date. A three-judge 3rd Circuit panel ultimately held that the requirement in the mail-in ballot law requiring a handwritten date had no bearing on a voter’s eligibility to cast a ballot.

More than half of states now allow no-excuse absentee voting. Pennsylvania joined them after Wolf agreed to a deal with Republicans that also did away with the straight-ticket voting by party option on ballots.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and @DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • lawsuits
  • mail-in voting
  • Pennsylvania
  • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Voting

    November 22, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Appeals Court Restricts Right to Sue Under the Voting Rights Act

    ST. LOUIS — A federal appeals court ruling this week limits the authority for lawsuits to enforce the Voting Rights... Read More

    ST. LOUIS — A federal appeals court ruling this week limits the authority for lawsuits to enforce the Voting Rights Act to government agencies. The ruling by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals means individuals and civil rights advocates can no longer sue to protect voting... Read More

    October 10, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Justices to Hear South Carolina Redistricting Case on Wednesday

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Wednesday over the constitutionality of South Carolina’s new congressional district map,... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Wednesday over the constitutionality of South Carolina’s new congressional district map, which allegedly moved Black voters out of one district to make it more hospitable to Republicans. The focal point of claims of an unlawful racial gerrymander... Read More

    October 7, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Hackers Access DC Voter Records

    WASHINGTON — Hackers breached the District of Columbia's Board of Elections website on Thursday, gaining access to 600,000 "lines" of... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Hackers breached the District of Columbia's Board of Elections website on Thursday, gaining access to 600,000 "lines" of U.S. voter data, including D.C. voters reports, city officials said. Sarah Winn Graham, the spokeswoman for the board, said a hacking group known as RansomVC claimed... Read More

    August 2, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Wisconsin Voting Advocates Try to Toss Map They Say Is Gerrymandered

    MADISON, Wisc. — Voting rights advocacy groups filed a lawsuit Wednesday that asks the Wisconsin Supreme Court to throw out... Read More

    MADISON, Wisc. — Voting rights advocacy groups filed a lawsuit Wednesday that asks the Wisconsin Supreme Court to throw out a state districting map they say reflects gerrymandering by Republicans. The lawsuit was filed one day after a justice was sworn into the Supreme Court who... Read More

    Corporations Are People. Voting Laws Should Follow.

    Finally, our lawmakers are starting to get it. Corporations are people, or at least people-adjacent, and as such, we are... Read More

    Finally, our lawmakers are starting to get it. Corporations are people, or at least people-adjacent, and as such, we are guaranteed certain unalienable rights, including the right to vote (see 26th Amendment). During this past legislative session, the Delaware House of Representatives passed a bill that... Read More

    July 17, 2023
    by Quinn O'Connor
    Idaho Attorney General Sued Over Misleading Ballot Titles  

    WASHINGTON — Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador is being sued over an initiative he filed June 30 to replace partisan... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador is being sued over an initiative he filed June 30 to replace partisan primaries with open top-four elections for the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, the state Legislature and other offices.  The initiative was filed last month... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top