Voting Machine Manufacturers Discuss Potential Election Interference From Foreign Adversaries
WASHINGTON – Top executives from companies that make voting machines tried to ease lawmaker’s concerns that hackers could influence the nation’s elections during a congressional hearing Thursday.
Their concern was heightened this week by an Iranian missile strike at a U.S. military installation in Iraq. The Iranians’ next step could be a cyberattack to interfere with the 2020 national elections, according to witnesses and congressmen.
“The thing I’m most worried about is a repeat of some of the types of attacks we saw in 2016 against larger election infrastructure,” Matt Blaze, a Georgetown University Law Center professor, told the Committee on House Administration.
“A determined adversary who wanted to disrupt our elections would have a frighteningly easy task,” Blaze said.
He was referring to Russian hackers who infiltrated U.S. voting systems in an apparent attempt to sway the last presidential election in favor of Donald Trump.
The congressional committee is considering proposals that would impose greater government regulation on voting machine manufacturers to reduce the risk of infiltration.
Three companies, Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Dominion Voting Systems and Hart InterCivic, make more than 80 percent of the voting machines used in the U.S..
Their chief executive officers testified to Congress for the first time about an industry that until now has operated in the background and been lightly regulated.
Until recently, the lack of an Internet connection for voting machines led lawmakers to believe they were secure from remote hacking, however, recent acknowledgements by the companies their machines use wireless modems able to connect to the Internet raised alarms in Congress.
“Despite their outsized role in the mechanics of our democracy, some have accused these companies with obfuscating and in some cases misleading election administrators and the American public,” said U.S. Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat who chairs the House Administration Committee.
She asked the chief executives about how their machines are made and where they get the parts.
“Do you have components in the supply chain that come from Russia or China?” Lofgren asked.
ES&S Chief Executive Tom Burt said his company uses “programmable logic devices” made by an American company with a factory in China. Texas Instruments, which owns a semiconductor plant in China, supplies ES&S with computer chips.
He added that his relatively small company lacks the influence to make his suppliers change their business partners.
Hart InterCivic Chief Executive Julie Mathis also said her company’s machines use parts made in China but not Russia.
Dominion Chief Executive John Poulos said his company’s machines were manufactured exclusively in the United States.
Voting machines are designed to comply with federal security standards developed 15 years ago, when election hacking appeared to be less of a threat.
The chief executives acknowledged that updates might be needed.
“We urge you to continue working with election officials to help remove additional barriers that exist for modernizing their infrastructure,” Poulous said.
All three of the executives said they are willing to cooperate in any new regulations that might require them to disclose suppliers for their components, details of their ownership and how they respond to cyberattacks.
They also thanked Congress for appropriating $425 million recently in supplemental federal Election Assistance Commission funding for states to improve election security. The money could be used to buy new voting machines and other equipment.
In The News
WASHINGTON - The story is a familiar one if you've been reading or talking about battleground and swing states this election cycle. Thanks to a combination of Donald Trump’s razor-thin wins and Hillary Clinton's narrow losses in 2016, and the changing demographics of state electorates, a... Read More
WASHINGTON - The Blue Dog Coalition of House Democrats has endorsed H.R. 4990, the Election Technology Research Act of 2019, a bipartisan bill that will give the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the National Science Foundation new resources to enhance the security of U.S.... Read More
National political parties are targeting a handful of competitive state legislative chambers this year, where the majority parties can draw favorable district lines — with the potential for gerrymandering — after the 2020 census. The state legislative campaign arms of both parties said wins in Florida,... Read More
Given the massive media attention it receives every four years as home to the first-in-the-nation presidential primary, it's sometimes easy to forget that New Hampshire is also a swing state. For decades, polling has shown independent-minded New Hampshirites are nearly always evenly split on which presidential... Read More
SAN JOSE, Calif. — The 2020 presidential hopefuls have bashed Facebook for its record of playing loose with user data, allowing political ads that spread lies and letting foreign actors mislead voters — and yet, they can’t get enough of the social media juggernaut. Facebook ads... Read More
WASHINGTON - Even among battleground states, Wisconsin is considered special; a study in political contrasts if ever there was one. It went for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, flipped to Donald Trump in 2016 by the narrowest of margins -- just 0.77% -- then turned... Read More