Virginia Ban on Uranium Mining Upheld
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday upheld Virginia’s decades-old ban on mining radioactive uranium, holding “Congress conspicuously chose to leave untouched the States’ historic authority over the regulation of mining activities on private lands within their borders.”
The huge deposit of uranium ore at the center of the case was discovered on private land in Pittsylvania County, Virginia in the early 1980s. Further analysis of the site led to estimates of roughly 119 million pounds of uranium ore being underground at the site.
Court documents from the case place the value of the deposit at about $6 billion.
The owners of the land above the deposit, Coles Hill LLC and Bowen Minerals LLC, have been eager to see the potential mine developed and have been leasing the mineral estate to Virginia Uranium and its parent company, Virginia Energy Resources, to do just that.
In 1985, the Virginia Coal and Energy Commission concluded the benefits of uranium mining greatly outweigh the costs associated with such activity, and that it could be carried out safely under strict guidelines imposed by the state.
Despite these assurances, the Virginia General Assembly kept the moratorium on mining in place.
Virginia Uranium sued in the Western District of Virginia on the grounds that Virginia’s moratorium is federally preempted. When the federal district court decided in favor of the state, the mining company appealed the case to the Fourth Circuit, where it also lost.
On Monday, the Supreme Court agreed with those decisions, ruling 6-3 that a federal law called the Atomic Energy Act does not keep the state from banning uranium mining.
“Virginia Uranium insists that the federal Atomic Energy Act preempts a state law banning uranium mining, but we do not see it,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the majority.
As explained in the ruling, the Act gives the federal government oversight over processing the radioactive uranium and storing the radioactive waste that results. However, it is silent on the subject of mining.
In a dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts said this is exactly the point. In his view, the state cannot ban uranium mining based on concerns about hazards connected with later steps. He was joined in dissent by Justices Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito.
The case is Virginia Uranium v. John Warren, 16-1275.
In The News
A new law in New York State requires pharmacies to inform patients of Class I drug recalls made by the Federal Drug Administration within seven days. Generally speaking, drug recalls occur when the quality or safety of a drug has been compromised. It can be due... Read More
WASHINGTON - A circuit court judge in South Carolina heard more than two hours of oral arguments Friday in a lawsuit challenging the state GOP executive committee's vote last month to forgo a 2020 Republican presidential primary. In the end, Circuit Judge Jocelyn Newman indicated her... Read More
The governors of five northeastern states came together for a summit on Thursday to discuss the outlines of a joint regional approach to cannabis and vaping policies. "This issue is complicated, controversial and consequential. It is probably one of the most challenging I've had to address... Read More
WASHINGTON - A House Panel that deals with water resource and environmental issues will travel to South Florida this weekend for a roundtable on infrastructure projects to be considered for inclusion in the next Water Resources Development Act. Rep. Grace Napolitano, D-Calif., chair of the House... Read More
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — A deranged person in Florida can tell people of a plan to commit a mass shooting and still not face arrest — as long as the threat isn’t written down. It’s an oddity in state law that a school safety commission and... Read More
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Census Bureau wants even more details on American residents, requesting states to provide driver’s license and administrative records to add to a trove of federal data being collected by the agency in its census count. Officials plan to use the administrative records... Read More