Trump Not Immune From Manhattan DA’s Demand for Tax Returns, Federal Appeals Court Rules
NEW YORK — President Donald Trump is not entitled to Oval Office immunity that would block Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance Jr. from obtaining copies of his tax returns, a federal appeals court ruled Monday.
The 34-page ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is another defeat for Trump in the legal battle over his tax returns. Vance’s subpoena for the records is on hold as the case makes its way to the Supreme Court.
“We are not faced, in this case, with the president’s arrest or imprisonment, or with an order compelling him to attend court at a particular time or place, or, indeed, with an order that compels the president himself to do anything. The subpoena at issue is directed not to the president, but to his accountants; compliance does not require the president to do anything at all,” Judge Robert Katzmann wrote for the three-judge panel.
“There is no obvious reason why a state could not begin to investigate a president during his term and, with the information secured during that search, ultimately determine to prosecute him after he leaves office.”
Vance is seeking eight years of Trump’s taxes in connection with an investigation into hush-money payments Trump made to women during the 2016 presidential campaign. Vance served the subpoena on Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA.
Trump’s attorneys had made a remarkably broad claim of presidential immunity, arguing it extended to associates and businesses. Trump attorney William Consovoy drew incredulous laughter during a hearing before the Manhattan appeals court last month when he said the president couldn’t be arrested if he actually shot someone on Fifth Avenue.
The new ruling avoided thorny questions about presidential powers and Vance’s authority as a local prosecutor.
“The subpoena seeks only the president’s private tax returns and financial information relating to the businesses he owns in his capacity as a private citizen,” the court wrote. “These documents do not implicate, in any way, the performance of his official duties.”
Trump attorney Jay Sekulow vowed to appeal.
“The decision of the 2nd Circuit will be taken to the Supreme Court. The issue raised in this case goes to the heart of our Republic. The constitutional issues are significant,” he said.
©2019 New York Daily News
Visit New York Daily News at www.nydailynews.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
In The News
WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump does not have the authority to unilaterally divert Pentagon funds to build a miles-long wall on the U.S. border with Mexico, a federal appeals court ruled Friday afternoon. In a 2-1 ruling, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the... Read More
WASHINGTON — A judge has ruled that Rep. Devin Nunes has no right to sue Twitter over statements made by a fake Internet cow, someone parodying his mother and a Republican strategist. Judge John Marshall said in a decision Friday that Twitter was “immune from the... Read More
WASHINGTON -- Current and former Justice Department attorneys on Wednesday accused the U.S. Attorney General of allowing Trump administration policies to influence criminal investigations and prosecutions. They also said during a House Judiciary Committee hearing that Justice Department administrators threatened attorneys who complained about the political... Read More
WASHINGTON -- With fall around the corner and coronavirus cases surging in some states, U.S. colleges are scrambling to figure out their gameplans for the upcoming school year. Public health experts have repeatedly warned of a potentially massive second wave of the pandemic if cases aren’t... Read More
WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court in Washington sided with the way the Trump administration expanded its fast-track deportation process last year to a broader swath of immigrants who enter the country illegally, including those found anywhere in the U.S. within two years of crossing the... Read More
California can't require a cancer warning label on Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide, a federal judge ruled Monday, saying the state hadn't met the legal standard for such a requirement. California requires warning labels on cancer-causing products under the state's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act. Currently... Read More