Trump Immigration Plan Could Raise Hunger in America
PHILADELPHIA — Having tried several times to cut the food stamp program, President Donald Trump has hit on a plan that could accomplish that, while curtailing another object of his ire: immigration.
A new rule put into the Federal Register on Monday could limit the number of legal immigrants living in or entering the United States by penalizing those who depend on food stamps, among other public assistance. Low-income immigrants would be denied green cards (permanent legal status) if it’s determined they will be relying on the federal safety net.
In howls of protest more vitriolic than usual, advocates and experts across America and the region have attacked the new rule as a sure way to increase the number of people suffering from hunger in the U.S., many of them children who are already citizens.
“It is simply cruel to deny food and other life-saving aid to immigrant children who are in the country legally,” said Joel Berg, CEO of the New York-based nonprofit Hunger Free America. “It is equally cruel to deny food to their parents, who are legally in America and often performing the nation’s hardest, lowest-paid work.
Kate Leone, chief government relations officer for Feeding America, the largest hunger-relief organization in the United States, said flatly that the rule “will increase hunger in this country,” and “create fear and confusion.”
And the Food Research & Action Center, the Washington, D.C.-based anti-hunger lobby, called the rule “deeply flawed” and “mean-spirited.”
Defending the policy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services acting Director Ken Cuccinelli said that it will promote “long-standing ideals,” such as accepting immigrants who exhibit “self-reliance, industriousness, and perseverance.”
On Tuesday, San Francisco and Santa Clara counties filed what the federal government said is the first lawsuit challenging the new rule. The suit argues that the change will worsen the health and well-being of residents. It would also result in a “chilling effect” causing immigrants to remove themselves from federal public assistance programs, potentially shifting costs to local government.
For more than a century, immigrants seeking to come to this country have had to prove they will not become a “public charge” — a poor person dependent on government help to survive.
But the Trump administration is dramatically expanding the conditions of the public charge test, and for the first time counting food stamps as a benefit program whose usage would be seen as a mark against immigrants. Those who use subsidized housing would also be included as public charges under the new rule.
Legal immigrants and their children have a right to apply for food stamps, now know as SNAP benefits for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, experts say.
Send food, not SNAP cards
Having begun his administration with a proposed Muslim ban and continuing with separating children from families to dissuade foreigners from immigrating, Trump also has tried various times to curtail SNAP benefits.
Among other plans, he has proposed that people be sent food packages in lieu of the debit-like electronic cards they use to access SNAP benefits. Advocates have said the plan would cost more than SNAP and be impossible to carry out.
Trump has said the $68 billion SNAP program is too costly. Hunger fighters say it provides a minimal benefit while preventing starvation.
Reacting to the new public charge rule, Glenn Bergman, executive director of Philabundance, the regional hunger-relief agency that’s part of Feeding America, said it’s part of “despicable policies” carried out by the administration.
“Food is a human right,” he said. “Philabundance sees any barriers to food access as an immoral act.”
The administration’s new rule is subject to a two-month comment period before it can be officially used in weighing an immigrant’s application to live in the U.S.
Not coming for giveaways
What is often misstated about immigrants is that they come to America precisely to latch onto government giveaways, advocates say.
“Most people who come here want to work,” said Kathy Fisher, policy director at the Greater Philadelphia Coalition Against Hunger and a SNAP expert. “And there already very strict requirements for those who receive benefits.”
Even people with green cards cannot begin to receive SNAP benefits until they’ve been in the U.S. for five years, Fisher said. “The door to America is not wide open for people to grab benefits,” she added.
Fisher said she was unaware of any statistics that describe the number of legal immigrants who use SNAP benefits.
Immigrants fear applying for help
Immigrants have been denying themselves benefits long before the new Trump rule was declared.
Low-income immigrant mothers are skipping the chance to get nutritious foods and help for their infants from the federal WIC program because they fear deportation, or the loss of their children, according to the agencies that distribute those benefits. WIC refers to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children.
And immigrant families are even staying away from food pantries because they’re afraid they’ll be detained, said Adele LaTourette, director of Hunger Free New Jersey, headquartered in Englewood.
“The level of fear has risen so dramatically, the chilling effect is people just don’t feel safe enough to enter an emergency pantry,” she said.
It may not be a well-founded worry, because no one is officially keeping track of individuals in pantries, said Patrick Druhan, director of Montgomery Hunger Solutions for Share Food Network. Share provides food to pantries in the region.
But the new rule will only serve to keep more families from accessing food they need, LaTourette said.
“Hunger will be increasing because of this rule,” she added. “It’s undeniable. It’s inevitable.”
©2019 The Philadelphia Inquirer
Visit The Philadelphia Inquirer at www.inquirer.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
In The News
WASHINGTON — Shortly after being sworn in as acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Chad Wolf — who the Senate confirmed as the agency’s policy undersecretary just hours earlier — conducted his first order of business. He moved Ken Cuccinelli, a favorite of immigration... Read More
WASHINGTON - A president has every right to undo a predecessor's policy he disagrees with, but if he does, he must do it the right way, the U.S. Supreme Court was told by immigrant advocates on Tuesday. That simple contention lay at the heart of one... Read More
TIJUANA, Mexico — Only 40 numbers stood between Miguel and his family’s turn to ask for asylum in the United States. Fleeing cartel violence in south Mexico, they have been waiting in Tijuana for five months for their chance to cross. Since Miguel and his family... Read More
Business leaders in California appealed to Congress Friday to expand financial assistance to immigrants trying to start their own businesses. They said small government investments can create big payoffs when immigrants start successful businesses that pay taxes and employ other persons. The U.S. Small Business Administration... Read More
WASHINGTON - The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court struggled on Monday to sort out ambiguities in the Immigration and Nationality Act related to when a noncitizen can apply for cancellation of a removal order. The case before the court involves Andre Martello Barton, a citizen... Read More
WASHINGTON - The House Problem Solvers Caucus, a group dedicated to finding bipartisan consensus on important issues, has endorsed a bill to extend earned visa status to individuals who can show they've been regularly employed as an agricultural laborer in the past two years. The bill,... Read More