Trump Campaign Sues California Over Tax Return Release Ballot Requirement

August 6, 2019 by Dan McCue

The Trump campaign and the Republican Party sued California on Tuesday over a new law requiring presidential candidates to release their tax returns to run in the state’s primary.

“Today we have taken decisive action in federal court challenging California’s attempt to circumvent the U.S. Constitution,” Jay Sekulow, a member of Trump’s personal legal team, said in a statement.

“The issue of whether the President should release his federal tax returns was litigated in the 2016 election and the American people spoke. The effort to deny California voters the opportunity to cast a ballot for President Trump in 2020 will clearly fail.”   

“Legal scholars from across the political spectrum have roundly condemned this flagrantly illegal statute. We are confident the courts will as well,” Sekulow added.

The lawsuit, filed in the Eastern District of California, argues the law signed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom last month is unconstitutional, violating both the First Amendment and restrictions on state power.

The law requires all candidates for president to disclose the previous five years of tax returns in order to appear on the primary ballot.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly said he’d release his tax returns, but then reneged on that promise, claiming his returns are still under audit. 

The lawsuit, which names California Secretary of State Alex Padilla and California Attorney General Xavier Becerra as defendants, claims the law is a “naked political attack against the sitting president of the United States.”

Litigation

Appeals Court Affirms House Rules In Rejecting Trump Bid to Withhold Financial Records Law
Appeals Court Affirms House Rules In Rejecting Trump Bid to Withhold Financial Records
October 11, 2019
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - A federal appeals court on Friday relied heavily on procedural rules adopted at the start of the 116th Congress in holding that President Donald Trump cannot ignore a subpoena for his financial records from House Democrats. Those rules were significantly revamped by the Problem... Read More

Alaska Supreme Court to Hear Youth's Climate Change Lawsuit Climate
Alaska Supreme Court to Hear Youth's Climate Change Lawsuit
October 9, 2019
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The Alaska Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday in a lawsuit claiming the state's policy on fossil fuels harms the constitutional rights of young Alaskans to a safe climate. In 2017, 16 young people filed suit over a state statute that says it is... Read More

Missouri Lawsuit Over Realtor Fees In Home Sales Draws Justice Department’s Interest Litigation
Missouri Lawsuit Over Realtor Fees In Home Sales Draws Justice Department’s Interest

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Lawyers in the Justice Department’s antitrust division are taking a keen interest in a Missouri class action lawsuit that alleges a conspiracy among national real estate brokers to charge inflated fees, noting in a filing this week that it is investigating the... Read More

Harvard Does Not Discriminate Against Asian Americans, Judge Rules Education
Harvard Does Not Discriminate Against Asian Americans, Judge Rules
October 1, 2019
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON — A federal judge in Boston ruled Tuesday that while "not perfect" Harvard University's admissions process does not discriminate against Asian Americans. U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs' ruling comes in a 2014 lawsuit filed by the group Students for Fair Admissions, which accused the... Read More

Who’s to Blame For The Nation’s Opioid Crisis? Massive Trial May Answer That Question Litigation
Who’s to Blame For The Nation’s Opioid Crisis? Massive Trial May Answer That Question

For the families of the roughly 400,000 Americans who have died of opioid drug overdoses since 1999, a legal drama scheduled to unfold in an Ohio courtroom next month may feel like a true shot at justice. After downplaying the risks of dangerous and highly addictive... Read More

Connecticut Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Alex Jones Civil Case Litigation
Connecticut Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Alex Jones Civil Case

HARTFORD, Conn. — The Connecticut Supreme Court Thursday held a wide-ranging hearing with justices questioning everything from whether attorneys for the families of the Sandy Hook victims overreacted to perceived threats by Alex Jones to admonishing Jones’ lawyer for suggesting sanctions against his client were only... Read More

Straight From The Well
scroll top