Most Reasonable Path to Senate Flip Is Trouncing of Trump, Think Tank Says
WASHINGTON – The start of primary season tends to focus the mind on the race for the White House, but if Democrats want to retake control of the U.S. Senate as well, they need to be looking at a decisive Electoral College victory, a new analysis by Third Way says.
In a new report the public policy think tank suggests that if the Democratic party’s eventual nominee simply crosses the finish line at 270 — the minimum amount of electoral votes needed to win the presidency — Mitch McConnell will likely remain Senate Majority Leader.
If Democrats want to win back the White House and gain a Democratic Senate, writes political analyst David de la Fuente, they need to aim for something closer to 340 electoral votes in November.
Third Way’s appraisal of the situation begins by acknowledging that Democrats may very well win back the White House by rebuilding the traditional “Blue Wall” in the battleground states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
But to flip the Senate, they need to create an updraft for candidates who are working to beat Republican incumbents in even redder territory.
“While voters used to split their ticket more often, the link between Presidential and Senate results has tightened over the past few cycles, reaching a whopping 100% in 2016,” de la Fuente says.
“If the top of the ticket doesn’t at least keep it close in states like North Carolina, Arizona, and Iowa, there’s little hope of Dems gaining a federal trifecta government to pass their agenda,” he adds.
Democrats currently have 47 seats in the Senate. They can’t take any state for granted, but considering 10 of their 12 senators up for reelection in 2020 come from states Hillary Clinton won in 2016, they have a good chance of holding at least 11 of these seats. The 12th seat is held by Sen. Doug Jones of Alabama.
While Jones is popular, he’s considered vulnerable because to win, he will have to outperform the top of the ticket. This, in a state that will almost certainly vote for Donald Trump for president by double digits.
That means Democrats should plan to try to flip four Senate seats currently held by Republicans — three because they already need them and one for insurance.
But the sledding won’t be easy. Pulling this off means defeating Republican incumbents, as no major retirements have opened up opportunities to flip seats.
According to de la Fuente, the five best targets are in states that appear most likely to vote Democratic at the presidential level in 2020—or at least be close.
These include Republican Sens. Cory Gardner, in Colorado, and Susan Collins, of Maine, who are trying to win reelection in states Hillary Clinton won in 2016.
“Democrats will probably need to win these two states at the presidential level to win the presidency, so they’re obviously appealing targets for Senate flips,” de la Fuente writes.
Two other Republican incumbents are running in states that Barack Obama won in at least one of his presidential victories.These are Sens Joni Ernst, in Iowa, and Thom Tillis in North Carolina.
The fifth target is a Romney-Trump state, but it’s one that shifted toward Democrats in 2016 and 2018.
Hillary Clinton lost Arizona by less than half the margin Obama did in 2012, and the state elected a Democratic senator in 2018. The incumbent is Sen. Martha McSally, who lost the 2018 Senate race, but was subsequently appointed to this seat after the death of Sen. John McCain.
“These are the five states that will determine whether a Democratic president can get anything done in 2021,” de la Fuente writes, getting to the heart of his argument. “If, as recent history predicts, the Senate results track closely with the top of the ticket, winning Senate seats in these five states would also require them to win the Electoral College with a total upwards of 340 votes.”
So what is that recent history?
Third way notes that over the last 20 years, the correlation between presidential and Senate results has increasingly tightened—leading up to 2016 when there appeared to be an ironclad locking of the two as intertwined elections.
Back in the Reagan-Bush days, the analysis says, the connection was relatively weak.
The highpoint was a 63% correlation in 1980 when the Reagan revolution swept in 10 new Republican senators on the president’s coattails. Despite this, Democratic senators were able to outrun the GOP’s large Electoral College wins in both 1984 and 1988, when less than half of all races had the same party win both contests in a state.
The connection between presidential and senate wins began to grow firmer with the election of President Bill Clinton in 1992.
Each party ended that election cycle with the same number of seats they started with, but the map shifted to align with the top of the ticket.
That meant the GOP started to gain more Senate seats in the South, while Democrats started picking up seats on the Pacific Coast, Northeast, and Great Lakes region.
By 2000, 71% of Senate races went to the same party that won the presidency in that state, jumping to 79% in 2004 with the GOP picking up several seats. The correlation continued to climb to 80% in 2008, and 82% in 2012.
The 2016 election brought a high-water mark that can’t be overtaken: 100%.
This made it the first election since the advent of the direct election of U.S. senators in which every senator who won belonged to the same political party that won their state at the presidential level.
“This pattern leaves no doubt that ticket-splitting in presidential election years is declining at a rapid rate,” de la Fuente writes. “While there are still a plethora of swing voters, many of them appear to be joining with more partisan voters in sticking with one party at the federal level once they have made up their minds in a given year—making it nearly impossible to get split results in federal elections statewide.”
In The News
WASHINGTON - With over 10.5 million Americans so far infected with COVID-19, the U.S. health care system’s focus has understandably been on strategies for combating the virus. Yet when the nation is finally able to shift back to handling longer-term health care issues, The Concord Coalition... Read More
WASHINGTON — Likely everyone has a personal opinion on the outcome of the upcoming election, but not many are as in-tune with the ins and outs of the current — and historic — political climate as the analysts brought together by David Rubenstein to discuss the... Read More
WASHINGTON — The term 5G is all over telecommunications these days. It comes with the promise of data speeds up to 100 times faster than current connections and the ability to support devices that will perform functions not yet imaginable. But it also comes with controversy... Read More
WASHINGTON —The pandemic and its accompanying economic downturn have led to unprecedented challenges including unanticipated job loss and difficulty accessing affordable and nutritious foods. In fact, more Americans than ever have needed to make use of food banks and assistance programs. As negotiations on a ‘Phase... Read More
Today the CATO Institute, a non-profit public policy research foundation, released its 15th biennial fiscal policy report card on the nation’s governors. This year’s CATO report card examines the country’s governors and their state budget actions since 2018. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the nation was... Read More
WASHINGTON — The issue of immigration can be polarizing, but the Bipartisan Policy Center has decided to tackle the topic with a series of discussions on immigration policies around the world. The think tank’s latest dialogue coincides with the launch of its new report examining how... Read More