Trump Administration to Appeal to Supreme Court in Census Case

The paperwork used by census takers in 2000. (Boris Yaro/Los Angeles Times/TNS)

January 23, 2019

By Greg Stohr

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s administration said it will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to allow a question about citizenship in the 2020 census, promising to file a quick appeal in the hope of resolving the issue in time to start printing questionnaires in June.

The appeal will challenge a Jan. 15 trial court ruling that barred the Commerce Department from including the question. U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in New York said Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross had committed a “veritable smorgasbord” of violations of the federal law that governs administrative agencies.

After the trial judge’s ruling, the high court last week scrapped plans to hear arguments Feb. 19 on a preliminary question in the case.

U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco said in court papers the justices should take the unusual step of skipping the federal appeals court level and directly reviewing Furman’s ruling. Francisco said the Census Bureau needs to finalize the questionnaire by the end of June, making the normal appellate process infeasible.

“It is exceedingly unlikely that there is sufficient time for review in both the court of appeals and in this court by that deadline,” Francisco wrote. He said the court could hear arguments either during its already-scheduled April sitting or in a special session in May.

Advocacy organizations and a New York-led group of states, cities and counties are suing, saying the citizenship question discriminates against immigrants and will reduce accuracy by lessening participation. A census undercount in areas with large numbers of noncitizens could shift congressional districts and federal dollars away from those communities.

Ross said last March that he was adding the citizenship question at the behest of the Justice Department, which had said it would help with enforcement of the Voting Rights Act, the landmark 1965 law designed to protect minority rights at the polls.

Furman said that explanation didn’t add up. The judge said Ross decided to add the question long before he received the Justice Department request, and after discussing the issue with Trump adviser Steve Bannon and then-Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach. Both are staunch advocates of curbing illegal immigration.

Furman said Ross had violated the Administrative Procedure Act in multiple ways.

“He failed to consider several important aspects of the problem; alternately ignored, cherry-picked, or badly misconstrued the evidence in the record before him; acted irrationally both in light of that evidence and his own stated decisional criteria; and failed to justify significant departures from past policies and practices,” Furman wrote in his 277-page ruling.

The Trump administration says census-takers have asked about citizenship as far back as 1820. The last time every household was asked about citizenship on the decennial census was in 1950.

From 1960 to 2000, a sample of the population was asked about citizenship. Since 2005, the Census Bureau has asked about citizenship in a separate annual survey sent to some people.

The 2010 census didn’t include a citizenship question.

The Supreme Court has already signaled its desire to have the case move with unusual speed. Even as it scheduled arguments on the preliminary question, the court let the trial go forward in Furman’s courtroom, rejecting the administration’s request to halt it. That two-track approach meant that Furman could issue his final ruling in time for the Supreme Court to review during the current term.

———

©2019 Bloomberg News

Visit Bloomberg News at www.bloomberg.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Supreme Court

High Court Blocks NY Coronavirus Limits on Houses of Worship
Supreme Court
High Court Blocks NY Coronavirus Limits on Houses of Worship

WASHINGTON (AP) — As coronavirus cases surge again nationwide the Supreme Court late Wednesday barred New York from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues in areas designated as hard hit by the virus. The justices split 5-4 with new Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the... Read More

Alito: COVID Crisis Has Been a ‘Constitutional Stress Test’
Supreme Court
Alito: COVID Crisis Has Been a ‘Constitutional Stress Test’
November 13, 2020
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., told the Federalist Society in a keynote address Thursday night the coronavirus pandemic has led to "previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty." "I am not diminishing the severity of the virus's threat to public health," Alito continued in a... Read More

Supreme Court Appears Likely to Preserve Most of Affordable Care Act
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Appears Likely to Preserve Most of Affordable Care Act
November 10, 2020
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON -- So much for the new conservative majority of the Supreme Court dismantling the Affordable Care Act. On Tuesday, during oral arguments for California v. Texas, one of this term's most anticipated cases, two members of that majority, suggested they're not inclined to strike down... Read More

All About the New ACA Challenge Before the Supreme Court
Supreme Court
All About the New ACA Challenge Before the Supreme Court
November 10, 2020
by Kate Michael

WASHINGTON — This morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on a legal challenge seeking to overturn the Affordable Care Act.  This third major challenge to the ACA heard by the Supreme Court, Texas v. California seeks to decide whether Congress, by eliminating the penalty... Read More

Political Gaze Shifts to the Supreme Court as Justices Hear Pivotal Health Care Case
Supreme Court
Political Gaze Shifts to the Supreme Court as Justices Hear Pivotal Health Care Case

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court with new Justice Amy Coney Barrett hears oral argument Tuesday in a case that threatens to wipe out the 2010 health care law, likely the term's most consequential case, under a political spotlight that rarely shines brighter on justices who would rather stay out of it.... Read More

Supreme Court Blocks Injured Officer's Suit Against Leader of Black Lives Matter Rally
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Blocks Injured Officer's Suit Against Leader of Black Lives Matter Rally

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday set aside an appeals court ruling by a panel of conservative judges that held an injured police officer could sue and win damages from the leader of a Black Lives Matter protest rally. The case had raised alarms among civil libertarians, who said it... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top