Trump Administration to Appeal to Supreme Court in Census Case

The paperwork used by census takers in 2000. (Boris Yaro/Los Angeles Times/TNS)

January 23, 2019

By Greg Stohr

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s administration said it will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to allow a question about citizenship in the 2020 census, promising to file a quick appeal in the hope of resolving the issue in time to start printing questionnaires in June.

The appeal will challenge a Jan. 15 trial court ruling that barred the Commerce Department from including the question. U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in New York said Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross had committed a “veritable smorgasbord” of violations of the federal law that governs administrative agencies.

After the trial judge’s ruling, the high court last week scrapped plans to hear arguments Feb. 19 on a preliminary question in the case.

U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco said in court papers the justices should take the unusual step of skipping the federal appeals court level and directly reviewing Furman’s ruling. Francisco said the Census Bureau needs to finalize the questionnaire by the end of June, making the normal appellate process infeasible.

“It is exceedingly unlikely that there is sufficient time for review in both the court of appeals and in this court by that deadline,” Francisco wrote. He said the court could hear arguments either during its already-scheduled April sitting or in a special session in May.

Advocacy organizations and a New York-led group of states, cities and counties are suing, saying the citizenship question discriminates against immigrants and will reduce accuracy by lessening participation. A census undercount in areas with large numbers of noncitizens could shift congressional districts and federal dollars away from those communities.

Ross said last March that he was adding the citizenship question at the behest of the Justice Department, which had said it would help with enforcement of the Voting Rights Act, the landmark 1965 law designed to protect minority rights at the polls.

Furman said that explanation didn’t add up. The judge said Ross decided to add the question long before he received the Justice Department request, and after discussing the issue with Trump adviser Steve Bannon and then-Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach. Both are staunch advocates of curbing illegal immigration.

Furman said Ross had violated the Administrative Procedure Act in multiple ways.

“He failed to consider several important aspects of the problem; alternately ignored, cherry-picked, or badly misconstrued the evidence in the record before him; acted irrationally both in light of that evidence and his own stated decisional criteria; and failed to justify significant departures from past policies and practices,” Furman wrote in his 277-page ruling.

The Trump administration says census-takers have asked about citizenship as far back as 1820. The last time every household was asked about citizenship on the decennial census was in 1950.

From 1960 to 2000, a sample of the population was asked about citizenship. Since 2005, the Census Bureau has asked about citizenship in a separate annual survey sent to some people.

The 2010 census didn’t include a citizenship question.

The Supreme Court has already signaled its desire to have the case move with unusual speed. Even as it scheduled arguments on the preliminary question, the court let the trial go forward in Furman’s courtroom, rejecting the administration’s request to halt it. That two-track approach meant that Furman could issue his final ruling in time for the Supreme Court to review during the current term.

———

©2019 Bloomberg News

Visit Bloomberg News at www.bloomberg.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

In The News

Health

Voting

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Appears Likely to Uphold Arizona Voting Restrictions
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Appears Likely to Uphold Arizona Voting Restrictions
March 2, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON – All six conservative justices on the Supreme Court appeared inclined Tuesday to support voting restrictions imposed in Arizona that critics say discriminate against racial minorities.  The case, Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (Consolidated), is one of the most watched of the current Supreme Court... Read More

Supreme Court Deals Blow to Trump
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Deals Blow to Trump
February 22, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected an effort by former President Donald Trump to shield his income tax records from N.Y. prosecutors. The court’s action is the apparent culmination of a lengthy legal battle that had already reached the high court once before.... Read More

Biden Administration Asks Supreme Court to Uphold ACA
Supreme Court
Biden Administration Asks Supreme Court to Uphold ACA
February 11, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The White House on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court it believes the Affordable Care Act should be upheld, reversing the position taken by the Trump Administration. The justices heard oral arguments in November in multiple cases involving a group of Republican-led states attempting to... Read More

Supreme Court Tosses Emoluments Lawsuits Against Trump, Calling Them Moot
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Tosses Emoluments Lawsuits Against Trump, Calling Them Moot
January 25, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a pair of emoluments lawsuits against former President Donald Trump, ruling the cases are moot now that he's left office. The lawsuits were filed by the attorneys general for Maryland and Washington, D.C., and the government watchdog, Citizens... Read More

Supreme Court Allows Government to Enforce Abortion Pill Rule
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government to Enforce Abortion Pill Rule
January 13, 2021
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court lifted a nationwide injunction Tuesday that had prevented the federal government from enforcing a rule that required women to see a health care professional in person before she'd be given access to a so-called abortion pill. The Food and Drug... Read More

Supreme Court Rules Challenge to Trump Census Plan is Premature
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Rules Challenge to Trump Census Plan is Premature
December 18, 2020
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a challenge to President Donald Trump's plan to exclude people living in the country illegally from the population count as premature. Trump's insistence that illegal immigrants be excluded from the count could profoundly impact the number of seats... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top