Supreme Court to Hold Special Hearing on Biden Vaccine Mandates

December 23, 2021 by Dan McCue
Supreme Court to Hold Special Hearing on Biden Vaccine Mandates
U.S. Supreme Court building. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court announced Wednesday night that it will hold a special hearing in January to consider the constitutionality of vaccine mandates imposed by the Biden administration.

Both of the cases the justices will hear on Friday, Jan. 7, involve the administration’s effort to deal with the spread of the coronavirus and its variants in the workplace.

All of the mandate requirements except testing are scheduled to start being enforced by OSHA on Jan. 10, 2022 and testing requirements will begin to be enforced by Feb. 9, 2022.

The decision to hold oral arguments on the cases — National Federation of Independent Businesses, et al. v. Dept. of Labor, OSHA, et al. and Ohio, et al. v. Dept. of Labor, OSHA, et al. — comes after the petitioners asked the high court to stay implementation of the mandates.

The request went to Justice Brett Kavanaugh who then referred the request to the full court. The justices had not been scheduled to return to the bench until the following Monday.

As is their custom, the justices did not explain their rationale for taking up the cases.

Of the two measures at issue in the underlying litigation, the most contentious is an order from the Biden administration that requires businesses with 100 or more employees to either ensure all of their employees are vaccinated or require them to be tested weekly and wear face masks to work.

The order would immediately affect more than 84 million workers, and the administration contends it would likely compel as many as 22 million unvaccinated Americans to get a COVID-19 shot and prevent at least a quarter-million hospitalizations.

The other mandate that the justices will review requires health care workers at hospitals that receive federal money to be vaccinated against the virus. 

Since the onset of the coronavirus pandemic in the winter of 2020, the Supreme Court has upheld most if not all of the state vaccine mandates that have come before it.

The main question in the two new cases is whether the government should be allowed to enforce the policies while litigation challenging them continues. 

But the justices’ decision on whether to grant emergency relief will likely be based on a different question: Whether Congress has authorized the executive branch to institute the requirements.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and at https://twitter.com/DanMcCue.

A+
a-
  • business
  • employers
  • Joe Biden
  • Supreme Court
  • vaccine mandates
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    Five Takeaways From the Abortion Pill Case Before US Supreme Court

    WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday did not appear ready to limit access to the abortion pill mifepristone,... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday did not appear ready to limit access to the abortion pill mifepristone, in a case that could have far-reaching implications for millions of American women and for scores of drugs regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. It's... Read More

    March 26, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Skeptical of Ban on Abortion Pill Mifepristone

    WASHINGTON — A hearing Tuesday before the Supreme Court indicated a majority of the justices want to maintain women’s access... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A hearing Tuesday before the Supreme Court indicated a majority of the justices want to maintain women’s access to the abortion pill mifepristone despite objections from anti-abortion activists. The doctors and organizations who sued argued the Food and Drug Administration was wrong in granting... Read More

    March 19, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Gives Texas Green Light to Deport Illegal Immigrants

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to begin enforcing a state law that effectively allows officials... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to begin enforcing a state law that effectively allows officials to deport undocumented immigrants, despite objections from the Biden administration, which argued only the federal government has authority over immigration issues. In an unsigned order, the... Read More

    A Supreme Court Ruling in a Social Media Case Could Set Standards for Free Speech in the Digital Age

    WASHINGTON (AP) — In a busy term that could set standards for free speech in the digital age, the Supreme... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — In a busy term that could set standards for free speech in the digital age, the Supreme Court on Monday is taking up a dispute between Republican-led states and the Biden administration over how far the federal government can go to combat controversial social... Read More

    March 4, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Rule Trump Can Stay on Colorado Ballot

    WASHINGTON — In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled Monday that former President Donald Trump may remain on Colorado’s... Read More

    WASHINGTON — In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled Monday that former President Donald Trump may remain on Colorado’s primary ballot, rejecting a challenge to his eligibility based on a section of the 14th Amendment that bars those who have “engaged in insurrection” from holding... Read More

    About as Many Abortions Happening in US Monthly as Before Roe Was Overturned, Report Finds

    The number of abortions performed each month is about the same as before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and... Read More

    The number of abortions performed each month is about the same as before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and the nationwide right to abortion more than a year and a half ago, a new report finds. The latest edition of the #WeCount report conducted for... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top