Supreme Court Says Sudan Liable for $4.3 Billion in Damages for 1998 Embassy Bombings

May 18, 2020 by Dan McCue
Supreme Court Says Sudan Liable for $4.3 Billion in Damages for 1998 Embassy Bombings
Statue outside the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Sudan is liable for $4.3 billion in punitive damages for the 1998 embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania that left 224 people dead and injured thousands.

Despite the court’s unanimous ruling, however, it is unlikely the victims and survivors of the simultaneous truck bombings in Kenya and Dar es Salaam will ever collect the full amount.

The incidents were the first major attacks on U.S. targets by al-Qaeda.

The case before the Supreme Court in involved lawsuits filed by victims and their families against Sudan accusing the country of causing the bombings by aiding al-Qaeda and leader Osama bin Laden, who lived in Sudan in the 1990s.

The over 500 people involved in the case are mostly foreign citizens, either U.S. government employees or contractors injured in the bombings or relatives of those who died.

After more than a decade of motions, intervening legislative amendments and a trial, a lower court initially awarded the group more than $10 billion, but an appeals court threw out $4 billion of the award that was punitive damages.

In doing so, it agreed with Sudan’s argument that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act barred the awarding of punitive damages.

Justice Neil Gorsuch delivered the opinion of the court, which all the other members joined except for Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who was named to the court after the case was considered.

In vacating the appeals court’s decision, Gorsuch says Sudan essentially was asking the court to “create and apply a new rule requiring Congress to provide a super-clear statement when it wishes to authorize” the use of punitive damages.

“We decline this invitation,” Gorsuch wrote. “It’s true that punitive damages aren’t merely a form of compensation but a form of punishment, and we don’t doubt that applying new punishments to completed conduct can raise serious constitutional questions.”

If Sudan thought the retroactive punitive damages awarded in the case were unconstitutional, the better course of action would have been to challenge the law’s constitutionality head on, Gorsuch said, “not ask a court to ignore the law’s manifest direction.”

“Besides, when we fashion interpretive rules, we usually try to ensure that they are reasonably administrable, comport with linguistic usage and expectations, and supply a stable backdrop against which Congress, lower courts, and litigants may plan and act,” he wrote

“Sudan’s proposal promises more nearly the opposite: How much clearer-than-clear should we require Congress to be when authorizing the retroactive use of punitive damages?” Gorsuch continued. “Sudan doesn’t even try to say, except to assure us it knows a super-clear statement when it sees it, and can’t seem to find one here. That sounds much less like an administrable rule of law than an appeal to the eye of the beholder.”

Aside from the question of the punitive damages award, the justices refused to wade into other outstanding matters related to the case, including whether Sudan can be held liable for punitive damages for claims filed under state law.

These matters it left for the appeals court to reconsider.

A+
a-
  • punitive damages
  • Sudan
  • Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    June 6, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Says Secular Nonprofit Organizations Can Receive Religious Tax Exemptions

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a religious charitable foundation can opt out of paying taxes for unemployment... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a religious charitable foundation can opt out of paying taxes for unemployment compensation in a decision that threatens to revamp part of the federal-state insurance program. Unemployment compensation provides financial benefits to workers who lose their jobs through... Read More

    June 3, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Lets Bans Stand on Semi-Automatic Weapons

    WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday upheld a ban on assault weapons but avoided a detailed explanation of the... Read More

    WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday upheld a ban on assault weapons but avoided a detailed explanation of the constitutional issues involved. The dispute arose from a Maryland law that bans weapons like the AR-15, whose high muzzle bullet speed and easy accessibility at gun... Read More

    June 2, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Agree to Hear Soldier’s Injury Claims Against Fluor

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to review a veteran’s lawsuit against defense contractor Fluor Corp., over injuries... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to review a veteran’s lawsuit against defense contractor Fluor Corp., over injuries he sustained in a 2016 suicide bombing in Afghanistan. As recounted in his petition to the high court, former U.S. Army Specialist Winston Hencely was just... Read More

    What Cases Are Left on the Supreme Court's Emergency Docket? Here's a Look

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The sequence of events is familiar: A lower court judge blocks a part of President Donald Trump’s... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The sequence of events is familiar: A lower court judge blocks a part of President Donald Trump’s agenda, an appellate panel refuses to put the order on hold while the case continues and the Justice Department turns to the Supreme Court. Trump administration lawyers... Read More

    May 30, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Say Trump Can Revoke Legal Protections for 500K+ Immigrants

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court held Friday that the Trump administration can revoke temporary legal protections bestowed by President Biden... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court held Friday that the Trump administration can revoke temporary legal protections bestowed by President Biden on more than 500,000 immigrants from four Latin American and Caribbean countries. As is their custom in cases where an emergency action has been requested of... Read More

    May 29, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Narrow Scope of Environmental Review for Infrastructure Projects

    WASHINGTON — A nearly unanimous Supreme Court on Thursday narrowed the scope of environmental review required under the National Environmental... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A nearly unanimous Supreme Court on Thursday narrowed the scope of environmental review required under the National Environmental Policy Act, holding the act does not require agencies to consider certain upstream or downstream impacts of the projects. At issue was a proposal by seven... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top