Supreme Court Says It Will Hear Oral Arguments by Telephone
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court announced Monday that it will hear oral arguments by telephone conference next month, including cases involving so-called “faithless electors” and the Affordable Care Act’s contraception requirement.
Those cases, respectively, are Colorado Department of State v. Baca and Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania.
Also on the unusual docket are the ongoing dispute over access to President Donald Trump’s tax returns (the consolidated cases Trump v. Vance; Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP; Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG) and unwanted robocalls and free speech (Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc.).
The court will hear 10 cases over six days — May 4–6 and 11-13 — with the justices and lawyers participating over teleconference to abide by social-distancing policies.
“In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the justices and counsel will all participate remotely,” a statement from the court said.
News media will have access to a live audio feed of the arguments, though the details have not been announced.
Monday’s announcement that the justices will use teleconferences for oral arguments is considered a major step for a court that is traditionally slow to adopt new technologies.
However, it comes after the coronavirus outbreak forced the court to postpone oral arguments in March and April.
Anthony Marcum, a resident fellow at R Street, a non-profit public policy research organization, said, “In light of the current public health crisis, the Supreme Court is taking the right step to hear oral arguments remotely. This sends a powerful message that the Court remains open for business and will carry on adjudicating the nation’s most pressing legal disputes.”
“Even better, it has been reported that live audio of these hearings will be available to the public. This is unprecedented and a tremendous step in improving the transparency of the Supreme Court. After this current health crisis is over, there is little reason why the Court should not continue this practice,” Marcum added.
The cases to be heard in May will be assigned specific argument dates once the court clerk’s office has confirmed the availability of counsel:
The entire list of cases to be heard in May is as follows:
18-9526, McGirt v. Oklahoma
19-46, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V.
19-177, Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.
19-267, Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, and 19-348, St. James School v. Biel
19-431, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, and 19-454, Trump v. Pennsylvania
19-465, Chiafalo v. Washington
19-518, Colorado Department of State v. Baca
19-631, Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc.
19-635, Trump v. Vance
19-715, Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, and 19-760, Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG
As has been true the past several weeks, the Supreme Court building remains open for official business, but most court personnel are teleworking. The building remains closed to the public until further notice.
In The News
The battle was joined on a Monday night. It was shortly after 7 p.m. on June 14, 1971, when a seething President Richard Nixon telephoned his attorney general, John Mitchell, and told him it was time to make the administration’s position clear to The New York... Read More
WASHINGTON -- A California law that requires nonprofit organizations to disclose their donors met with skepticism among most of the U.S. Supreme Court’s justices during a hearing Monday. The law is opposed by coalitions of nonprofit organizations that say the disclosures could dry up their contributions... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — After more than a decade in which the Supreme Court moved gradually toward more leniency for minors convicted of murder, the justices on Thursday moved the other way.The high court ruled 6-3 along liberal-conservative lines against a Mississippi inmate sentenced to life in... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — Civil liberties groups are asking the Supreme Court to give the public access to opinions of the secretive court that reviews bulk email collection, warrantless internet searches and other government surveillance programs.The groups say in an appeal filed with the high court Monday... Read More
WASHINGTON - President Biden will sign an executive order Friday that creates a bipartisan commission to study expanding the Supreme Court, as he promised throughout the 2020 election, the White House said. The commission will be chaired by former White House counsel Bob Bauer and Cristina... Read More
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Monday sided with Google in a long running copyright dispute over the software used in Android, the mobile operating system. The court decision was 6-2, as Justice Amy Coney Barrett had not yet been confirmed by the Senate when the... Read More