Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Florida Medicaid in Settlement Dispute

June 6, 2022 by Dan McCue
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Florida Medicaid in Settlement Dispute
The U.S. Supreme Court. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 on Monday in favor of Florida’s Medicaid program in a dispute over how much money the state can take from an accident victim’s private settlement to recover the costs of their care.

Gianinna Gallardo was just 13 when she was struck by a truck shortly after she stepped off her Florida school bus.

Florida’s Medicaid agency paid $862,688.77 to cover Gallardo’s initial medical expenses, and the agency continues to pay her medical expenses. 

While this was going on, Gallardo, through her parents, sued the truck’s owner and driver, as well as the Lee County School Board.


According to the Supreme Court’s summary of the case, Gallardo sought compensation for past medical expenses, future medical expenses, lost earnings, and other damages. That litigation resulted in a settlement for $800,000, with $35,367.52 expressly designated as compensation for past medical expenses

The settlement did not specifically allocate any amount for future medical expenses.

The Medicaid Act requires participating states to pay for certain needy individuals’ medical costs and then to make reasonable efforts to recoup those costs from liable third parties. 

Under Florida’s Medicaid Third-Party Liability Act, the court said, “a beneficiary like Gallardo who ‘’accept[s] medical assistance’ from Medicaid ‘automatically assigns to the [state] agency any right’ to third-party payments for medical care.” 


Applied to Gallardo’s settlement, Florida’s statutory framework entitled the state to $300,000— 37.5% of $800,000, the percentage the statute sets as presumptively representing the portion of the settlement compensating for future medical expenses. 

On review, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held the relevant Medicaid Act provisions do not prevent a state from seeking reimbursement from settlement monies allocated for future medical care. 

Gallardo argued that the Medicaid Act’s anti-lien provision — which prohibits states from recovering medical payments from a beneficiary’s ‘property,’ forecloses recovery from settlement amounts other than those allocated for past medical care paid for by Medicaid. 

But in a ruling written by Justice Clarence Thomas, the court majority held that the provision does not apply to state laws “expressly authorized by the terms of… the Medicaid Act.” 

In a dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said “the court’s atomizing interpretation has little to commend it, particularly when contrasted with the consistent, administrable scheme Congress crafted. 

“The court’s reading also undercuts Congress’ choice to allow Medicaid beneficiaries to place their excess recovery funds in Special Needs Trusts, protecting their ability to pay for important expenses Medicaid will not cover.”


In short, she said, the majority’s holding “is inconsistent with the structure of the Medicaid program and will cause needless unfairness and disruption.”

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and at https://twitter.com/DanMcCue.

A+
a-
  • Medicaid
  • Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    May 25, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Justices Urged to Reconsider Limits on Public Officials' Defamation Suits

    WASHINGTON — A petition to the Supreme Court filed last week alleging defamation of a former Senate candidate by media... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A petition to the Supreme Court filed last week alleging defamation of a former Senate candidate by media outlets is threatening a fundamental principle of law that protects news organizations.  Former Senate candidate Don Blankenship is suing Fox News, MSNBC, CNN and other media... Read More

    May 25, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Limits EPA's Power Under Clean Water Act

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday narrowed the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate wetlands under the Clean... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday narrowed the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate wetlands under the Clean Water Act, in the process finally ending a legal battle between the property owners and the agency that’s gone on for the past 19 years. The... Read More

    May 18, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Holds Twitter, Google Not Responsible for ISIS Content

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against the family of a 2015 ISIS attack victim, saying they could... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against the family of a 2015 ISIS attack victim, saying they could not hold Google “directly” or “secondarily” liable for posts the terror group made to the tech giant’s YouTube site before the strike that left 130 people... Read More

    May 18, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Conclude Warhol Foundation Violated Copyright With Prince Portrait

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Thursday concluded that the pop artist Andy Warhol infringed on a photographer’s copyright... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Thursday concluded that the pop artist Andy Warhol infringed on a photographer’s copyright when he used her work as the basis for a portrait of Prince that appeared in Vanity Fair magazine. In a 7-2 ruling the justices held... Read More

    May 15, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Justices to Decide if House Dems Can Get Trump Hotel Docs

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to review a dispute over whether Congress can get access to documents... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to review a dispute over whether Congress can get access to documents surrounding former President Donald Trump’s lease of a government building he turned into a posh Washington, D.C., hotel. The House Committee on Oversight and Reform seeks... Read More

    May 15, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Refuse to Hear 'Skinny Label' Drug Patent Case

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday declined to review a 2020 decision by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday declined to review a 2020 decision by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that resulted in Teva Pharmaceuticals being found liable for $235 million for infringing on a GlaxoSmithKline heart drug patent. The case placed... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top