Supreme Court Investigation Hasn’t Turned Up Abortion Ruling Leaker

January 19, 2023 by Dan McCue
Supreme Court Investigation Hasn’t Turned Up Abortion Ruling Leaker
(Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — A monthslong internal investigation has failed to identify the person who leaked a draft copy of the Dobbs ruling to Politico last year, the Supreme Court announced Thursday.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is the landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the justices overturned Roe v. Wade, in the process declaring the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.

The leak of the draft, dated February 2022 and published by Politico in May, was an extraordinary breach of the court’s usual secrecy. 

In fact, the opening words of the 20-page report on the investigation released Thursday describes the leak as “one of the worst breaches of trust” in the court’s history.

“The leak was no mere misguided attempt at protest. It was a grave assault on the judicial process,” the opening of the release says.

The court’s marshal, who was responsible for overseeing the inquiry, said that investigators had conducted 126 formal interviews of 97 employees, all of whom had denied being the source of the leak. 

Investigators also found no forensic evidence by examining the court’s “computer devices, networks, printers and available call and text logs,” the report says.

Several employees of the court did admit to investigators, the report says, that they had told their spouses or partners about the draft opinion and the vote count in violation of the court’s confidentiality rules. 

However, the investigation did not “by a preponderance of the evidence” determine that any of those discussions led to a copy of the draft opinion becoming public.

“The pandemic and resulting expansion of the ability to work from home, as well as gaps in the court’s security policies, created an environment where it was too easy to remove sensitive information from the building and the court’s IT networks, increasing the risk of both deliberate and accidental disclosures of [the] court’s sensitive information. 

“The investigation has identified numerous court policies and practices that should be improved,” the report says.

Investigators also noted it is unlikely that the public disclosure was caused by a hack of the court’s IT systems. 

“The court’s IT department did not find any indications of a hack but continues to monitor and audit the system for any indicators of compromise or intrusion into the court’s IT infrastructure,” the report states, adding, “The investigators have likewise not uncovered any evidence that an employee with elevated IT access privileges accessed or moved the draft opinion. 

“At this time, based on a preponderance of the evidence standard, it is not possible to determine the identity of any individual who may have disclosed the document or how the draft opinion ended up with Politico. …  In time, continued investigation and analysis may produce additional leads that could identify the source of the disclosure. 

“Whether or not any individual is ever identified as the source of the disclosure, the court should take action to create and implement better policies to govern the handling of court-sensitive information and determine the best IT systems for security and collaboration,” the report says.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and @DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • leak investigation
  • Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    July 8, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Lifts Stay on Trump Effort to Slash Federal Workforce

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted a lower court’s order that had prevented the Trump administration from moving... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted a lower court’s order that had prevented the Trump administration from moving forward with planned mass layoffs and the dismantling of a number of federal agencies. In its unsigned ruling, the court said an executive order signed by... Read More

    July 3, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court to Decide Liability of Transit Agencies After Accidents

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to determine whether New Jersey Transit is immune from liability as a state... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to determine whether New Jersey Transit is immune from liability as a state agency. The public transit agency was sued by two men who were hit and injured by commuter buses in separate accidents. In one case of a... Read More

    July 3, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Justices to Take Up Two Transgender Athlete Cases Next Term

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court announced Thursday that it will hear two cases challenging the constitutionality of state laws that... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court announced Thursday that it will hear two cases challenging the constitutionality of state laws that bar transgender athletes from girls’ and women’s sports teams. The two cases come to the court from Idaho and West Virginia. Just last month, a sharply... Read More

    July 1, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court to Review $1B Cox Digital Copyright Case

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide a copyright dispute between Cox Communications and major music labels... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide a copyright dispute between Cox Communications and major music labels that could set the stage for a landmark decision on copyright infringement liability in the digital era. The case is Cox Communications, Inc., et al. v.... Read More

    July 1, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Agrees to Rehear Case Seeking End to Campaign Finance Limits

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a lawsuit during its next term that seeks to end some... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a lawsuit during its next term that seeks to end some restrictions on campaign spending by political parties. The limits were imposed during the Nixon administration to prevent political parties from coordinating efforts with candidates on how... Read More

    Supreme Court Throws Out Appellate Rulings in Favor of Transgender People in Four States

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday threw out appellate rulings in favor of transgender people in four states following the... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday threw out appellate rulings in favor of transgender people in four states following the justices' recent decision upholding a Tennessee ban on certain medical treatment for transgender youths. But the justices took no action in cases from Arizona, Idaho and West Virginia... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top