Supreme Court Holds Oil Rig Supervisor Paid $200K Owed Overtime

February 27, 2023 by Dan McCue
Supreme Court Holds Oil Rig Supervisor Paid $200K Owed Overtime
"Oil Platform in the Santa Barbara Channel, California 2," by Ken Lund, is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

WASHINGTON — An oil rig supervisor who earned as much as $248,000 a year working for Houston, Texas-based Helix Energy Solutions Group was entitled to additional overtime pay after his dismissal, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week.

The case, Helix Energy Solutions Group v. Hewitt, is seen as having significant and potentially costly implications for the oil and gas industry.

Michael Hewitt worked from 2015 to 2017 as a supervisor of Helix’s offshore oil and gas operations, earning over $200,000 annually for supervising 12-14 men.

Officially, Hewitt was a “toolpusher,” with largely administrative duties that included ensuring the oil rig had sufficient materials, spare parts and skilled personnel to operate efficiently.

Consistent with industry practices, Hewitt worked 28-hitches, living on the rig for 28 days at a time and being on-duty for 12 hours each day. For this he was paid at a rate that ranged from $963 to $1,341 a day over the course of his employment.

In all, Hewitt earned $248,053 in 2015, $218,863 in 2016, and $143,680 ($215,520 annualized) for the eight months he worked in 2017. 

After Helix fired Hewitt, he filed a putative class action alleging the Fair Labor Standards Act entitled him and similarly situated employees to overtime.

Helix pushed back, arguing that while it is true “covered” employees must receive overtime when they work more than 40 hours a week, Hewitt was exempt from this requirement because he worked in a supervisory role and he was paid on a salary basis. 

To bolster its position, Helix noted that it never deducted any amount from Hewitt’s pay based on the quantity or quality of his work, and that he received at least $963, regardless of the hours he worked.

A district court judge who first heard the case agreed with Helix’s view, finding Hewitt was paid on a salary basis and thus was not due overtime pay.

But the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision, holding that Helix Energy’s compensation for Hewitt did not satisfy a provision of the FLSA that allowed so-called daily rate workers to be paid on a salary basis.

Helix appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which, in a 6-3 decision, upheld the 5th Circuit’s decision.

The majority’s position, as spelled out by Justice Elena Kagan, was that a regulation adopted in the 1940s was the deciding factor in the case. 

That regulation holds that highly compensated workers — now defined as those earning $107,000 a year or more — would not be eligible for overtime pay if they a) performed supervisory duties, and b) were paid at least $455 per week in salary.

“The question here is whether a high-earning employee is compensated on a ‘salary basis’ when his paycheck is based solely on a daily rate — so that he receives a certain amount if he works one day in a week, twice as much for two days, three times as much for three, and so on,” wrote Kagan.

“We hold that such an employee is not paid on a salary basis, and thus is entitled to overtime pay,” Kagan wrote.

Among those who disagreed was Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who, in a dissent joined by fellow conservative Justice Samuel Alito, wrote that because Hewitt earned a set daily rate, he knew he would be paid at least that much for any week in which he worked. 

That coupled with his supervisory duties made him exempt from overtime pay, Kavanaugh said.

Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch in a very brief, separate dissent said he would dismiss the case as having been “improvidently granted” by the Supreme Court.

A number of oil and gas trade groups filed briefs backing Helix’s position.

Among these were the American Petroleum Institute and the Texas Oil and Gas Association, which argued in a joint brief that the pay practice Helix had employed to compensate Hewitt “has been relied upon and survived for decades without censure.”

They went on to assert, “The high-compensation guarantees commanded by oilfield consultants are the product of the significant bargaining power these highly skilled, scarce consultants leverage with oil and natural gas companies, and are, in fact, a type of compensation method the Department of Labor contemplated when drafting the Highly Compensated Employee exception.

“These guarantees further reflect the historic economic balance the industry must maintain given the particularly unpredictable nature of oil patch work. Against this backdrop, the 5th Circuit’s majority opinion departs from all of the circuit courts that have ruled on these legal issues. The opinion departs from the Fair Labor Standards Act text and intent, and destabilizes the financial foundation underpinning exploration and production in the most oil and natural gas-rich regions across the United States. 

“The opinion will impact states’ economies, as well as the U.S. economy, given the country’s use of oil and gas, the amount of jobs and dollars the midstream and downstream sectors represent,” the two organizations wrote. 

They went on to estimate that a $200,000 annual salary like Hewitt earned could result in as much as an additional $52,000 a year in back wages.

“Appending these types of costs to expensive exploration will drive up oil and gas production costs, slow down production, and threaten consultant jobs nationwide, contrary to the FLSA’s intent,” they wrote.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and @DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • oil and gas
  • oil rig worker
  • Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    Five Takeaways From the Abortion Pill Case Before US Supreme Court

    WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday did not appear ready to limit access to the abortion pill mifepristone,... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday did not appear ready to limit access to the abortion pill mifepristone, in a case that could have far-reaching implications for millions of American women and for scores of drugs regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. It's... Read More

    March 26, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Skeptical of Ban on Abortion Pill Mifepristone

    WASHINGTON — A hearing Tuesday before the Supreme Court indicated a majority of the justices want to maintain women’s access... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A hearing Tuesday before the Supreme Court indicated a majority of the justices want to maintain women’s access to the abortion pill mifepristone despite objections from anti-abortion activists. The doctors and organizations who sued argued the Food and Drug Administration was wrong in granting... Read More

    March 19, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Gives Texas Green Light to Deport Illegal Immigrants

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to begin enforcing a state law that effectively allows officials... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to begin enforcing a state law that effectively allows officials to deport undocumented immigrants, despite objections from the Biden administration, which argued only the federal government has authority over immigration issues. In an unsigned order, the... Read More

    A Supreme Court Ruling in a Social Media Case Could Set Standards for Free Speech in the Digital Age

    WASHINGTON (AP) — In a busy term that could set standards for free speech in the digital age, the Supreme... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — In a busy term that could set standards for free speech in the digital age, the Supreme Court on Monday is taking up a dispute between Republican-led states and the Biden administration over how far the federal government can go to combat controversial social... Read More

    March 4, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Rule Trump Can Stay on Colorado Ballot

    WASHINGTON — In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled Monday that former President Donald Trump may remain on Colorado’s... Read More

    WASHINGTON — In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled Monday that former President Donald Trump may remain on Colorado’s primary ballot, rejecting a challenge to his eligibility based on a section of the 14th Amendment that bars those who have “engaged in insurrection” from holding... Read More

    About as Many Abortions Happening in US Monthly as Before Roe Was Overturned, Report Finds

    The number of abortions performed each month is about the same as before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and... Read More

    The number of abortions performed each month is about the same as before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and the nationwide right to abortion more than a year and a half ago, a new report finds. The latest edition of the #WeCount report conducted for... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top