Supreme Court Allows Government to Enforce Abortion Pill Rule
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court lifted a nationwide injunction Tuesday that had prevented the federal government from enforcing a rule that required women to see a health care professional in person before she’d be given access to a so-called abortion pill.
The Food and Drug Administration has argued for two decades that Mifeprez, a drug used during the first 10 weeks of pregnancy, must be given to a patient by a health care professional in a doctor’s office, clinic or hospital.
As part of the process, the patient must sign a form acknowledging she’s been counseled about the drug’s possible risks. However, once she’s fulfilled those obligations, she can effectively take the pill whenever she wants.
After the onset of the coronavirus pandemic last February, a group of doctors, led by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, sued the FDA, arguing that under the circumstances, requiring a woman to make an in-person visit to a health care provider exposed them to a heightened risk of infection.
U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang sided with the doctors, ruling in July that enforcing the FDA rule during the pandemic would “place a substantial obstacle in the path of women seeking a medication abortion and that may delay or preclude a medication abortion and thus may necessitate a more invasive procedure.”
He further directed that the pills could simply be sent to patients by mail.
But on Tuesday, a majority on the Supreme Court said Chuang had gotten it wrong.
As is their custom on emergency applications, the majority did not explain its reasoning.
But in a concurring opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. said the fault in the lower court’s ruling lay not in its implications for a woman’s right to seek an abortion, but rather in its failure to pay sufficient deference to the “politically accountable branches” — the FDA — charged with regulating public health issues.
“My view is that courts owe significant deference to the politically accountable entities with the ‘background, competence, and expertise to assess public health,’” Roberts wrote, referring to an opinion he wrote upholding state limits on attendance at church worship services.
“In light of those considerations, I do not see a sufficient basis here for the district court to compel the FDA to alter the regimen for medical abortion,” he said.
The Mifeprez abortion pill is typically used to end early stage pregnancies. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has long argued that the pill is safe and does not require in-person dispensing to patients.
In a dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the decision by the court’s conservative majority was a blow to the majority of women seeking an abortion during the first 10 weeks of pregnancy because they rely on the drug in question.
“The FDA’s policy imposes an unnecessary, unjustifiable, irrational, and undue burden on a women seeking abortion during the current pandemic,” Sotomayor wrote in an opinion joined by Justice Elena Kagan.
“This country’s laws have long singled out abortions for more onerous treatment than other medical procedures that carry similar or greater risks,” Sotomayor continued. “One can only hope that the government will reconsider and exhibit greater care and empathy for women seeking some measure of control over their health and reproductive lives in these unsettling times.”
Justice Stephen Breyer also noted his dissent, but did not join Sotomayor’s opinion. He said he would have left the hold in place on the rule’s enforcement.
In The News
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court lifted a nationwide injunction Tuesday that had prevented the federal government from enforcing a rule that required women to see a health care professional in person before she'd be given access to a so-called abortion pill. The Food and Drug... Read More
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a challenge to President Donald Trump's plan to exclude people living in the country illegally from the population count as premature. Trump's insistence that illegal immigrants be excluded from the count could profoundly impact the number of seats... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Wednesday to decide whether major colleges and universities are violating federal antitrust laws by refusing to pay the football and basketball players who bring in hundreds of millions of dollars to their campuses. The National Collegiate Athletic Association and several... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from Kansas that sought to revive a law requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote. The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declared the law unconstitutional in April, prompting the appeal by Kansas Secretary of... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a lawsuit backed by President Donald Trump to overturn Joe Biden’s election victory, ending a desperate attempt to get legal issues rejected by state and federal judges before the nation’s highest court. The court’s order was its... Read More
WASHINGTON — Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro told the Supreme Court Thursday it should not tolerate “this seditious abuse of the judicial process” and should “send a clear and unmistakable signal” so that it does not happen again. He was responding to an unusual lawsuit filed... Read More