Pressure Mounts on Supreme Court to Adopt a Code of Ethics for Itself

February 13, 2023 by Tom Ramstack
Pressure Mounts on Supreme Court to Adopt a Code of Ethics for Itself
A crowd gathers outside the U.S. Supreme Court. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — Political pressure is mounting on the U.S. Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics for itself similar to the one that binds all other federal courts.

In a move last week, members of Congress reintroduced a bill that could compel a code of ethics for Supreme Court justices. A similar measure failed last year but lawmakers say this time growing public support gives it a better chance.

Lawmakers have complained the justices allow their own political views to influence rulings and get away with conflicts of interest that might bind others. 

Last year’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision that outlawed a federal right to abortion enraged many liberals about being too politicized.

“Every federal judge is bound by a code of ethics, except for the nine who sit on the highest court in the country,” said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn. “Trust in the Supreme Court is at a historic low because the American people see justices hide their conflicts of interest and openly engage in political behavior.”

Murphy introduced the bill, called the Supreme Court Ethics Act, in the Senate. If Congress approves it, the legislation would require the U.S. Judicial Conference to issue a code of conduct for the Supreme Court. The Judicial Conference oversees ethics and management of federal courts.

Other provisions would appoint an Ethics Investigations Counsel to set up a process for the public to report unethical conduct by the justices and to launch independent investigations.

The legislation also would require the justices to recuse themselves when cases present a conflict of interest for them. They would need to publicly disclose the conflicts.

Other support for reform comes from the American Bar Association, where its 591-member House of Delegates last week approved a resolution calling for a Supreme Court code of ethics.

The resolution went further by recommending that federal, state, local and territorial bar associations “adopt their own resolutions urging the Supreme Court of the United States to adopt a code of judicial ethics.”

In addition to the resolution, the American Bar Association said in a statement that “the absence of a clearly articulated, binding code of ethics for the justices of the court imperils the legitimacy of the court.”

Until recently, the Supreme Court has evaded a code of ethics by claiming a need for independence as it fulfills its unique role of deciding constitutional issues. The justices are concerned a code of ethics might be overly restrictive in their job duties.

They say they try to voluntarily comply with the same ethics rules as other federal judges by filing annual financial disclosure forms, such as on outside income, gifts and travel paid by other persons.

The justices acknowledge they are working behind the scenes to craft a code but have not been able to reach complete agreement on it.

Justice Elena Kagan told a House appropriations subcommittee in 2019, “It’s something that is being thought very seriously about.”

The issue gained momentum a year later when Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, played a role in challenging the 2020 presidential election vote count while her husband considered cases on the subject. Ginni Thomas was a supporter of Donald Trump.

Chief Justice John Roberts addressed calls for a Supreme Court code of ethics in a 2011 end-of-year report on the court’s activities.

He said the nine justices already follow the code of ethics of other federal courts but acknowledged their efforts were voluntary.

Roberts said that if the code of ethics became mandatory, it could violate the Constitution’s separation of powers.

Enforcing a code of ethics on the Supreme Court could cause more conflicts than it resolves, Roberts wrote.

If the court did try to police its own ethics, “it would create an undesirable situation in which the court could affect the outcome of a case by selecting who among its members may participate,” Roberts wrote.

The legal research outlet Bloomberg Law reported Monday that Supreme Court justices recused themselves from about 3% of the appeals the court handled since 2018.

Among the 750 recusals, few of the justices listed the reasons they removed themselves from the cases. The Bloomberg Law review showed that personal financial interests and previous cases in which they represented a party were the most common reasons for recusal.

You can reach us at [email protected] and follow us on Facebook and Twitter

A+
a-
  • ethics
  • Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    December 4, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Appear Divided Over Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy Deal

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court appeared divided on Monday over a bankruptcy deal struck by Purdue Pharma that would immunize... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court appeared divided on Monday over a bankruptcy deal struck by Purdue Pharma that would immunize the Sackler family, its one-time owners, from civil lawsuits for their role in the opioid crisis.  The closely watched case is considered to be among the most... Read More

    November 30, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Leans Toward Reducing Enforcement Authority of Federal Agencies

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court seemed ready Wednesday to cut back on the authority of federal agencies to enforce their... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court seemed ready Wednesday to cut back on the authority of federal agencies to enforce their regulations through fines or seizures of property. Questions from the conservative majority of justices during a hearing focused on whether the agencies were committing unconstitutional procedural... Read More

    November 30, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Chaos Reigns as Democrats Vote to Subpoena Crow, Leo in SCOTUS Probe

    WASHINGTON — A Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday became the latest venue for Capitol Hill dysfunction as Democrats on... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday became the latest venue for Capitol Hill dysfunction as Democrats on the panel approved issuing subpoenas to billionaire Harlan Crow and influential conservative Leonard Leo as part of an ongoing investigation into alleged ethical lapses by Supreme... Read More

    November 28, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Asked to Parse Accelerated Sentencing Guidelines

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court returned to the bench for its December session on Monday, considering a pair of cases... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court returned to the bench for its December session on Monday, considering a pair of cases whose outcome could have sweeping consequences for the sentencing of recidivist offenders charged with federal crimes. The cases, which were consolidated for the sake of oral... Read More

    November 17, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Blocks Florida Law Banning Kids From Drag Shows

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a Florida law that bans child access to drag shows, saying... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a Florida law that bans child access to drag shows, saying it violates First Amendment free speech rights. Gov. Ron DeSantis and his supporters enacted the law to protect children from what they consider corrupt influences. The... Read More

    November 17, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Guns, Social Media and Fair Play for Whistleblowers Stand Out on Early Docket

    WASHINGTON — While “chaos” was the most apt description for certain parts of the federal government in October, the U.S.... Read More

    WASHINGTON — While “chaos” was the most apt description for certain parts of the federal government in October, the U.S. Supreme Court reconvened and got on with the business of unwinding the nation’s thorniest legal questions. By the time Congress finally chose Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La.,... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top