Pipeline Company Can Use Eminent Domain to Claim State Land

June 29, 2021 by Dan McCue
Pipeline Company Can Use Eminent Domain to Claim State Land
Looking up at the entrance of the U.S. Supreme Court building. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday a company building a natural gas pipeline in New Jersey can continue to rely on eminent domain to claim state land in its path.

The 5-4 ruling by the court included both liberal and conservative members of the court in the majority.

But it drew a quick rebuke from a prominent Democrat in Congress who said he was “deeply disturbed” and “disappointed” by the outcome.

“The Supreme Court’s decision … sets the dangerous precedent of allowing interstate pipelines to take state-owned lands without a state’s consent,” Said Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

“States like New Jersey should be able to retain their right to do what they wish with the lands they own, and no private actor — including pipeline companies — should be able to usurp that right,” Pallone added. “I am determined to work with my colleagues to do everything in our power to preserve this important state right.”

The case involves a planned 116-mile pipeline that the PennEast Pipeline Co. wants to run from Pennsylvania’s Luzerne County to Mercer County in New Jersey. 

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission had allowed the company’s project to move forward in 2018 by granting PennEast a so-called certificate of public convenience and necessity, but lawsuits followed.

The company ultimately took New Jersey to court to acquire state-controlled land for its project. 

PennEast argued the commission’s greenlighting of its project allowed it to take New Jersey to court and to use eminent domain to acquire state-controlled properties. 

New Jersey, which opposes the pipeline project, had argued that PennEast couldn’t take the state to court to acquire the property — only the United States government can. 

But Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, disagreed.

Roberts said that when FERC issues a certificate of public convenience and necessity, federal law authorizes the certificate’s holder “to condemn all necessary rights-of-way, whether owned by private parties or states.”

Roberts was joined by conservative justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh and liberal justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor.

Despite today’s ruling, a separate challenge to the pipeline is pending in a federal appeals court in Washington.

The case is PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey, 19-1039.

A+
a-
  • eminent domain
  • pipeline
  • Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    June 20, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Says Fuel Groups Have Standing to Fight Emissions Waiver

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday held that fuel industry groups can challenge the Clean Air Act waiver granted... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday held that fuel industry groups can challenge the Clean Air Act waiver granted by the Environmental Protection Agency that allowed California to set its own greenhouse gas emissions standards for vehicles. A lower court, the D.C. Circuit, had ruled... Read More

    June 20, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Open Door to Multiple-Venue Challenges to E-Cigarette Rules

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday held that retailers who would sell a new tobacco product if not for... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday held that retailers who would sell a new tobacco product if not for the Food and Drug Administration’s rejection of the product, can sue to seek judicial review of the agency’s decision. The 7-2 ruling by the court in... Read More

    June 18, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Upholds Tennessee Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming medical care for minors, a ruling... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming medical care for minors, a ruling seen as a significant setback for those advocating for greater transgender rights. The ruling in United States v. Skrmetti, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, upholds... Read More

    June 6, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Says Secular Nonprofit Organizations Can Receive Religious Tax Exemptions

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a religious charitable foundation can opt out of paying taxes for unemployment... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a religious charitable foundation can opt out of paying taxes for unemployment compensation in a decision that threatens to revamp part of the federal-state insurance program. Unemployment compensation provides financial benefits to workers who lose their jobs through... Read More

    June 3, 2025
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Lets Bans Stand on Semi-Automatic Weapons

    WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday upheld a ban on assault weapons but avoided a detailed explanation of the... Read More

    WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday upheld a ban on assault weapons but avoided a detailed explanation of the constitutional issues involved. The dispute arose from a Maryland law that bans weapons like the AR-15, whose high muzzle bullet speed and easy accessibility at gun... Read More

    June 2, 2025
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Agree to Hear Soldier’s Injury Claims Against Fluor

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to review a veteran’s lawsuit against defense contractor Fluor Corp., over injuries... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to review a veteran’s lawsuit against defense contractor Fluor Corp., over injuries he sustained in a 2016 suicide bombing in Afghanistan. As recounted in his petition to the high court, former U.S. Army Specialist Winston Hencely was just... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top