Minister Says He Successfully Lobbied Supreme Court Justices for His Causes
WASHINGTON — An evangelical minister who on Thursday claimed to be a whistleblower on conflicts of interest at the Supreme Court told Congress that for years he recruited “stealth missionaries” to advocate conservative causes to the justices.
The wealthy couples Robert L. Schenck said he used to win influence met some of their greatest success with Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.
“Our overarching goals were to gain insight into the conservative justices’ thinking and to shore up their resolve to render solid, unapologetic opinions,” Schenck told the House Judiciary Committee.
Democrats on the committee used the hearing to say Schenck’s testimony showed the need for Congress to impose a new code of conduct on the Supreme Court.
Conservative lawmakers, as well as a lawyer who testified during the hearing, responded by calling Schenck a “liar” or saying he engaged in “gossip” and “hearsay” as he tried to win attention that might result in more donations to his nonprofit group.
Schenck is president and founder of the Dietrich Bonhoeffer Institute, a Christian public advocacy organization that hosts discussions on political issues among clergy, politicians and other institution leaders.
From 1995 to 2018, Schenck led Faith and Action, a group that organized 20 meetings between his “stealth missionaries” and conservative Supreme Court Justices Thomas, Alito and Antonin Scalia.
In July 2022, Schenck revealed in media interviews that he coached the wealthy couples to subtly advocate against abortion before the justices. They would arrange the meetings using tactics such as donations to the Supreme Court Historical Society.
“That proved to be very effective,” Schenck said Thursday.
On one occasion, Schenck said he learned about the 2014 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores ruling before it was announced when Alito leaked it to two of his colleagues during a private dinner at the justice’s home.
The Hobby Lobby decision allowed corporations to be exempt from regulations for religious reasons if government agencies could use less restrictive means of enforcing laws. Much of the concern in the case focused on whether employers must supply employees with contraceptives as a required health benefit.
The colleagues, Gayle and Don Wright, as well as Alito, deny Schenck’s allegation of the leaked ruling.
On another occasion, Schenck said Thomas told him, “Keep up what you’re doing. It’s making a difference.”
He denied motives of personal gain for his whistleblower testimony.
“I felt as though it was a moral obligation,” Schenck said.
Mark Paoletta, a lawyer who has represented Thomas’ wife and knows the justice, said Schenck’s lobbying efforts had “zero impact” on the Supreme Court.
“Mr. Schenck rewrites history to suit his needs,” Paoletta said.
Rep. Thomas McClintock, R-Calif., said, “There is nothing, nothing to support his claims.”
Democrats pressed ahead with their assertions that Schenck’s testimony shows the need for a bill they approved in May to institute a new Supreme Court code of conduct. The Supreme Court is exempt from the code of conduct for judges in lower courts.
The bill would require Supreme Court justices to publicly disclose all gifts and income they receive. It would set stricter standards for them to recuse themselves from cases that might represent a conflict of interest.
It is awaiting a vote in the full House. A companion bill is pending in the Senate.
“The [Supreme] Court either cannot or will not do what is in its best interest, therefore the Congress must step in,” said Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga. “The answer here is not revolutionary, it is to impose a code of ethics.”
Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., said, “The Supreme Court is long overdue for a more ethical code of conduct.”
Tom can be reached at email@example.com and @TomRamstack
In The News
WASHINGTON — A bill introduced in the Senate last week would require the Supreme Court to televise its hearings. Senators... Read More
WASHINGTON — A bill introduced in the Senate last week would require the Supreme Court to televise its hearings. Senators who introduced the bill said it would help to ensure transparency and better public understanding of how the court operates. “Rulings made by justices in our... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a champion for women's rights whose death ahead of the 2020 election allowed the... Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a champion for women's rights whose death ahead of the 2020 election allowed the Supreme Court to become more conservative, will be remembered during ceremonies Friday at the high court. Ginsburg, who served as a justice for 27 years and... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court’s conservative majority showed skepticism during a hearing Tuesday of the Biden administration’s authority to forgive... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court’s conservative majority showed skepticism during a hearing Tuesday of the Biden administration’s authority to forgive more than $400 billion in student debt. The Education Department is invoking the national emergency created by the COVID-19 pandemic to eliminate as much as $20,000... Read More
WASHINGTON — An oil rig supervisor who earned as much as $248,000 a year working for Houston, Texas-based Helix Energy... Read More
WASHINGTON — An oil rig supervisor who earned as much as $248,000 a year working for Houston, Texas-based Helix Energy Solutions Group was entitled to additional overtime pay after his dismissal, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week. The case, Helix Energy Solutions Group v. Hewitt,... Read More
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court showed minimal interest Tuesday in reducing the legal protections for internet companies over inflammatory... Read More
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court showed minimal interest Tuesday in reducing the legal protections for internet companies over inflammatory information their users post online. The court’s greater concern was unleashing a flood of lawsuits that could drive technology companies out of business if they eliminate... Read More
WASHINGTON — Political pressure is mounting on the U.S. Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics for itself similar... Read More
WASHINGTON — Political pressure is mounting on the U.S. Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics for itself similar to the one that binds all other federal courts. In a move last week, members of Congress reintroduced a bill that could compel a code of... Read More