Key Senators Express Satisfaction in FBI Report, Firming Up Kavanaugh’s Likelihood for Supreme Court

Supreme Court Associate Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh at his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Hart Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2018. (Christy Bowe/Globe Photos/Zuma Press/TNS)

October 4, 2018

By Chris Megerian, Jennifer Haberkorn and Sarah D. Wire

WASHINGTON — Senators on Thursday began reviewing a confidential FBI report into sexual assault and misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court, as tensions built before a procedural vote scheduled for Friday that will likely signal whether he can be confirmed.

There were growing signs by midday Thursday that two wavering Republicans were satisfied with the FBI report, raising hopes at the White House that they were falling into line and would back Kavanaugh, ending what has become a bitter partisan battle over the future of the nation’s highest court in the #MeToo era.

A single copy of the hotly anticipated report, which the FBI produced in less than a week, was delivered to Capitol Hill before dawn Thursday and placed in a secure room. Democrats and Republicans took turns reviewing the contents, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said they did not plan to release the report despite urging from both sides of the aisle.

A final vote on the nomination is expected on Saturday, but the results probably will be telegraphed early Friday with the procedural vote on whether to proceed.

After an explosive Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Sept. 27, FBI agents were given the task of performing a supplemental review to help senators determine if Kavanaugh assaulted Christine Blasey Ford, a Palo Alto University professor, when they were high school students or exposed himself to Deborah Ramirez at a dorm room party when they were classmates at Yale University.

Kavanaugh has vehemently denied those allegations.

The White House ordered the FBI probe following demands from three Republicans — Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine and Jeff Flake of Arizona — who are key votes on Kavanaugh’s nomination.

If no Democrats vote for Kavanaugh, McConnell can afford only one defection from his own caucus. But the White House was feeling more confident after two of the wavering Republicans said they were pleased by the FBI review despite concerns from Democrats that it was incomplete.

“It appears to be a very thorough investigation,” Collins told reporters. Flake agreed, telling reporters on Capitol Hill that he saw “no additional” corroboration of the allegations against Kavanaugh in the report.

Two Democrats, Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, who voted for Trump’s first Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, have not announced their decision on Kavanaugh. Both face uphill reelection races in November in states that Trump won handily in 2016.

Manchin is considered more likely to buck his party and support Kavanaugh, but Democratic Senate sources said he is not expected to step forward as the deciding vote. That means Republicans probably need to find enough votes in their own ranks to get to 50.

The completion of the FBI report led to a new round of partisan bickering. Republican leaders said the report shows no incriminating information about Kavanaugh, who sits on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

“This investigation found no hint of misconduct and the same is true of the six prior FBI background investigations conducted during Judge Kavanaugh’s 25 years of public service,” Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles E. Grassley, R-Iowa, said in a statement.

Democrats insisted the FBI probe was short-circuited and incomplete.

“The most notable part of this report is what’s not in it,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, told reporters. “It looks to be a product of an incomplete investigation that was limited.”

Trump said it would be impossible to appease Democrats. “This is now the 7th. time the FBI has investigated Judge Kavanaugh,” he tweeted. “If we made it 100, it would still not be good enough for the Obstructionist Democrats.”

FBI background checks usually do not examine events before a nominee turns 18, which is when Ford alleges she was assaulted by Kavanaugh. She said that in the summer of 1982, when she was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17, he and a friend drunkenly pushed her into a room at a party and he climbed on top of her, covering her mouth when she tried to shout for help.

The FBI investigation appears to have been circumscribed from the beginning. White House Deputy Press Secretary Raj Shah told CNN early Thursday that the Republican-controlled Senate provided the FBI with only four names for people to interview to start the investigation, far short of the two dozen suggested by Democrats.

Ultimately 10 people were contacted, Shah said.

Neither Ford nor Kavanaugh, who both gave extensive testimony under oath to the Senate committee, was questioned, prompting complaints from Ford’s lawyers.

“We are profoundly disappointed that after the tremendous sacrifice she made in coming forward, those directing the FBI investigation were not interested in seeking the truth,” Ford’s lawyers said in a statement.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told Fox News that “the idea that the FBI needs to interview her again is ludicrous.”

The people complaining the loudest, Sanders said, had already decided to vote against Kavanaugh.

“They don’t actually want more information,” she said. “It’s a total sham.”

———

©2018 Los Angeles Times

Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

In The News

Health

Voting

Supreme Court

Justices Consider Hearing a Case on 'Most Offensive Word'
Supreme Court
Justices Consider Hearing a Case on 'Most Offensive Word'

WASHINGTON (AP) — Robert Collier says that during the seven years he worked as an operating room aide at Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas, white nurses called him and other Black employees "boy." Management ignored two large swastikas painted on a storage room wall. And for... Read More

Recalling the Pentagon Papers Case, 50 Years On (Part Four)
Media
Recalling the Pentagon Papers Case, 50 Years On (Part Four)
May 12, 2021
by Dan McCue

(This is the fourth and final part of a four-part series. The first three parts can be read here, here and here.) The First Amendment Prevails The Supreme Court’s decision in the Pentagon Papers case, officially, New York Times Co. v. United States, affirmed historical precedents... Read More

Recalling the Pentagon Papers Case, 50 Years On (Part Two)
Media
Recalling the Pentagon Papers Case, 50 Years On (Part Two)
May 11, 2021
by Dan McCue

(This is the second part of a four-part series. The first installment can be read here.) To Publish or Not to Publish Upon his return to Washington, Sheehan and an editor booked a room at the Jefferson Hotel, where they spent weeks reading and summarizing the... Read More

Recalling the Pentagon Papers Case, 50 Years On (Part One)
Media
Recalling the Pentagon Papers Case, 50 Years On (Part One)
May 10, 2021
by Dan McCue

The battle was joined on a Monday night. It was shortly after 7 p.m. on June 14, 1971, when a seething President Richard Nixon telephoned his attorney general, John Mitchell, and told him it was time to make the administration’s position clear to The New York... Read More

Law Requiring Nonprofit Disclosures Gets Chilly Reception in Supreme Court
Supreme Court
Law Requiring Nonprofit Disclosures Gets Chilly Reception in Supreme Court
April 27, 2021
by Tom Ramstack

WASHINGTON -- A California law that requires nonprofit organizations to disclose their donors met with skepticism among most of the U.S. Supreme Court’s justices during a hearing Monday. The law is opposed by coalitions of nonprofit organizations that say the disclosures could dry up their contributions... Read More

High Court Moves Away from Leniency for Minors Who Murder
Supreme Court
High Court Moves Away from Leniency for Minors Who Murder

WASHINGTON (AP) — After more than a decade in which the Supreme Court moved gradually toward more leniency for minors convicted of murder, the justices on Thursday moved the other way.The high court ruled 6-3 along liberal-conservative lines against a Mississippi inmate sentenced to life in... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top