Justices Won’t Take Up Lawsuit Claiming DNC Tipped Scales for Clinton in 2016

June 2, 2020 by Dan McCue
Justices Won’t Take Up Lawsuit Claiming DNC Tipped Scales for Clinton in 2016
Democratic National Committee Headquarters. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court declined on Monday to revive a lawsuit filed by supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who claimed the Democratic National Committee improperly tipped the scales for Hillary Clinton during the 2016 primaries.

As is their custom, the justices did not explain their rationale for refusing to take up the case.

Throughout the 2016 primary season, the Sanders campaign claimed the party establishment had its “finger on the scales” but had no concrete proof to rest their claims on.

That changed when leaked DNC emails suggesting Democratic party officials had favored Clinton over the Vermont senator during the primaries, were posted on the WikiLeaks website.

The leak “strongly indicates that the DNC’s entire approach to the [primary] process was guided by the singular goal of elevating Clinton to the general election contest,” the complaint stated.

WikiLeaks never disclosed who gave it the thousands of pages of emails; 12 Russian military intelligence officers were later indicted in connection with the DNC hack and hacking of the Clinton presidential campaign.

The lawsuit dispensed with Monday was filed shortly thereafter, and then-DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz announced her resignation on the eve of the Democratic National Convention.

The lawsuit by Sanders was dismissed by the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Florida, and that dismissal was later upheld by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

A+
a-
  • 2016 Election
  • Bernie Sanders
  • Democratic National Committee
  • Hillary Clinton
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    Supreme Court Finds No Bias Against Black Voters in a South Carolina Congressional District

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court 's conservative majority on Thursday preserved a Republican-held South Carolina congressional district, rejecting a lower-court ruling... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court 's conservative majority on Thursday preserved a Republican-held South Carolina congressional district, rejecting a lower-court ruling that said the district discriminated against Black voters. In dissent, liberal justices warned that the court was insulating states from claims of unconstitutional racial gerrymandering. In... Read More

    May 16, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Hold Consumer Protection Agency’s Funding Is Constitutional

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a constitutional challenge to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, ruling the mechanism... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a constitutional challenge to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, ruling the mechanism used to fund the agency does not violate the appropriations clause. The decision, by a 7-2 vote, ended what many considered the most dangerous legal challenge... Read More

    70 Years Ago, School Integration was a Dream Many Believed Could Actually Happen. It Hasn't.

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Seventy years ago this week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled separating children in schools by race was... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Seventy years ago this week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled separating children in schools by race was unconstitutional. On paper, that decision — the fabled Brown v. Board of Education, taught in most every American classroom — still stands. But for decades, American schools... Read More

    April 25, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Loud, Raucous Crowd Gathers Outside Supreme Court, but MAGA Hard to Find

    WASHINGTON — They banged on pots. They banged on pans. They raised their voices and even jingled a few tambourines. ... Read More

    WASHINGTON — They banged on pots. They banged on pans. They raised their voices and even jingled a few tambourines.  All in the hope of making their opinions plain to the nine justices assembled inside to hear the most consequential and final case of the current... Read More

    April 25, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Cautious Over Claims of Absolute Immunity for Trump

    WASHINGTON — Comments from Supreme Court justices Thursday indicated former President Donald Trump is likely to face criminal and civil... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Comments from Supreme Court justices Thursday indicated former President Donald Trump is likely to face criminal and civil charges despite his claim of immunity while he was president. Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election led to felony charges against him that include... Read More

    April 16, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Divided on Law for Prosecuting Jan. 6 Rioters

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether to throw out criminal charges of obstructing an official... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether to throw out criminal charges of obstructing an official proceeding against Jan. 6 defendants, including former President Donald Trump. About 350 persons who invaded the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection have been charged... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top