Justices Urged to Reconsider Limits on Public Officials’ Defamation Suits

May 25, 2023 by Tom Ramstack
Justices Urged to Reconsider Limits on Public Officials’ Defamation Suits
U.S. Supreme Court Building. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — A petition to the Supreme Court filed last week alleging defamation of a former Senate candidate by media outlets is threatening a fundamental principle of law that protects news organizations. 

Former Senate candidate Don Blankenship is suing Fox News, MSNBC, CNN and other media outlets for their reports on his criminal record. He says they mischaracterized his criminal conviction.

The reports ended Blankenship’s candidacy to the Senate, despite being a leading candidate beforehand, according to his Supreme Court petition.

Blankenship’s writ of certiorari follows the $787 million settlement Fox News agreed to pay Dominion Voting Systems to resolve a defamation lawsuit.

Both legal claims appear to be part of a larger backlash against the media this year, much of it focused on the “actual malice” standard news organizations use to protect themselves from liability.

Other lawsuits filed against the media this year include a $3.78 billion claim Donald Trump’s media organization filed against The Washington Post and another one retired Pro Football Hall of Fame quarterback Brett Favre filed against sports commentators who accused him of theft in a welfare fraud scandal.

The lawsuits follow a line of reasoning similar to Blankenship’s petition to the Supreme Court, namely that it accuses the media of evading responsibility for defamation by invoking the actual malice standard and similar First Amendment protections.

Blankenship, the ex-chief executive of coal company Massey Energy, was running for the U.S. Senate in 2018 when media organizations reported he was a convicted felon. In truth, he spent a year in jail after a misdemeanor conviction.  

He had been charged with securities fraud and making false statements, both of which are felonies.

The same jury that convicted him in 2015 on a misdemeanor charge of conspiring to violate federal mine safety standards acquitted him of the felonies.

The issue was the Upper Big Branch Mine disaster in Raleigh County, West Virginia, that killed 29 miners in 2010. The mine was owned by Massey Energy while Blankenship still was the chief executive officer.

Blankenship’s petition to the Supreme Court argues that the 1964 First Amendment ruling in New York Times v. Sullivan should be revisited. The ruling set out the actual malice standard, which says public figures can recover for defamation only if media organizations knew their reports were false or demonstrated “reckless disregard” for the truth.

In the related legal dispute by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News, the voting machine company said reporters knew they were repeating Trump’s falsehoods when they reported the company’s machines were rigged during the 2020 presidential election to make Joe Biden win.

Fox News did not admit knowingly reporting false information when it agreed to pay the $787 million, which set a record for a settlement by a media company.

Blankenship’s petition says the actual malice standard gives the media “a license to publish defamatory falsehoods that misinform voters, manipulate elections, intensify polarization and incite unrest.”

Blankenship draws authority in his petition from statements in recent years by conservative Supreme Court justices. 

One of them came from Justice Clarence Thomas, who made headlines in 2019 when he called the Sullivan ruling “policy-driven decisions masquerading as constitutional law.” 

Blankenship also quoted Justice Neil Gorsuch’s 2021 criticism of the doctrine, which said, “the actual malice standard has evolved from a high bar to recovery into an effective immunity from liability.”

In a press release, his legal team said, “The underlying lawsuit concerned weaponized defamation that derailed Mr. Blankenship’s candidacy. The defamation of Mr. Blankenship began two weeks before the election on April 25, 2018, when Fox News legal expert Judge Andrew Napolitano … falsely reported that Mr. Blankenship ‘went to prison for manslaughter.’”

No successful Senate candidate has ever been convicted of a felony.

The case is Blankenship v. NBCUniversal LLC.

You can reach us at [email protected] and follow us on Facebook and Twitter

A+
a-
  • actual malice
  • defamation
  • New York Times v Sullivan
  • Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    April 16, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Divided on Law for Prosecuting Jan. 6 Rioters

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether to throw out criminal charges of obstructing an official... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether to throw out criminal charges of obstructing an official proceeding against Jan. 6 defendants, including former President Donald Trump. About 350 persons who invaded the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection have been charged... Read More

    Five Takeaways From the Abortion Pill Case Before US Supreme Court

    WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday did not appear ready to limit access to the abortion pill mifepristone,... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday did not appear ready to limit access to the abortion pill mifepristone, in a case that could have far-reaching implications for millions of American women and for scores of drugs regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. It's... Read More

    March 26, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Skeptical of Ban on Abortion Pill Mifepristone

    WASHINGTON — A hearing Tuesday before the Supreme Court indicated a majority of the justices want to maintain women’s access... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A hearing Tuesday before the Supreme Court indicated a majority of the justices want to maintain women’s access to the abortion pill mifepristone despite objections from anti-abortion activists. The doctors and organizations who sued argued the Food and Drug Administration was wrong in granting... Read More

    March 19, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Supreme Court Gives Texas Green Light to Deport Illegal Immigrants

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to begin enforcing a state law that effectively allows officials... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to begin enforcing a state law that effectively allows officials to deport undocumented immigrants, despite objections from the Biden administration, which argued only the federal government has authority over immigration issues. In an unsigned order, the... Read More

    A Supreme Court Ruling in a Social Media Case Could Set Standards for Free Speech in the Digital Age

    WASHINGTON (AP) — In a busy term that could set standards for free speech in the digital age, the Supreme... Read More

    WASHINGTON (AP) — In a busy term that could set standards for free speech in the digital age, the Supreme Court on Monday is taking up a dispute between Republican-led states and the Biden administration over how far the federal government can go to combat controversial social... Read More

    March 4, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Rule Trump Can Stay on Colorado Ballot

    WASHINGTON — In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled Monday that former President Donald Trump may remain on Colorado’s... Read More

    WASHINGTON — In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled Monday that former President Donald Trump may remain on Colorado’s primary ballot, rejecting a challenge to his eligibility based on a section of the 14th Amendment that bars those who have “engaged in insurrection” from holding... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top