Justices to Decide if House Dems Can Get Trump Hotel Docs

May 15, 2023 by Tom Ramstack
Justices to Decide if House Dems Can Get Trump Hotel Docs
The Trump International Hotel in 2019. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to review a dispute over whether Congress can get access to documents surrounding former President Donald Trump’s lease of a government building he turned into a posh Washington, D.C., hotel.

The House Committee on Oversight and Reform seeks the records as it investigates whether Trump profited illegally from his status as president.

When the Trump administration declined the 2017 request for information from seven Democrats on the committee, they sued.

Trump’s attorneys argued the executive privilege of the presidency exempted him from the lawsuit.

A federal trial court in Washington, D.C., dismissed the lawsuit in 2018, saying members of Congress lacked standing — or a legal right — to sue. A divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reversed the lower court in a 2-1 decision in 2020.

The appellate court ruled that the congressmen were acting lawfully by “suing to enforce statutorily created informational rights against federal agencies.”

The Trump Organization leased the Old Post Office Pavilion from the U.S. General Services Administration for $180 million over 60 years.

The Old Post Office served as the main post office for Washington, D.C., from 1899 to 1914 before it was converted to federal office space. It is located a short walking distance from the White House and continues to be owned by the federal government.

The GSA was renting it as retail space until a subsidiary of the Trump Organization leased it in 2013.

Trump’s DJT Holdings LLC renovated it and operated it as the luxury Trump International Hotel from 2016 to 2022. DJT Holdings LLC then sold it to CGI Merchant Group, which reopened it as the Waldorf Astoria Washington on June 1, 2022.

While it operated as Trump International Hotel, foreign dignitaries and various kinds of executives who did business with the U.S. government or the Trump Organization often stayed there.

Trump International Hotel prompted numerous complaints from other hotel owners in Washington. They said the Trump Organization was taking business from them while the foreign dignitaries and executives curried favor with the president by staying in his hotel.

It also led to allegations from Democrats in Congress over whether Trump violated the emoluments clause of the Constitution. The clause forbids high-level government officials from receiving fees, profits or gifts from foreign governments without the consent of Congress.

The Biden administration joined in a rare show of support for Trump in opposing the congressional lawsuit.

In a filing with the Supreme Court, the Biden administration wrote that if the Democratic lawmakers win their lawsuit, “A congressional minority — ‘or even an ideological fringe of the minority’ — could bring cases to ‘distract and harass executive agencies and their most senior officials.'” 

The Supreme Court’s announcement on the case Monday comes amid mounting legal troubles for the former president.

In addition to facing criminal charges in New York on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, he is likely to be compelled soon to give a deposition in a lawsuit by former FBI agents. He won a delay in the lawsuit on Friday.

Two former FBI agents claim they were wrongfully fired for investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and Trump’s handling of classified documents.

Text messages exchanged between former agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page criticized Trump, which officially was the reason they were fired.

Strzok and Page say in their lawsuit the real reason they were fired was a political reprisal while they were properly performing their jobs. Strzok also was an FBI attorney.

Strzok wanted to question Trump during a deposition but the Justice Department intervened by arguing in U.S. District Court that FBI Director Christopher Wray must be deposed first. The normal order for depositions when the government is sued runs from officials with lowest seniority to highest seniority.

A deposition for Trump first would make it “impossible to determine if the director’s deposition might obviate the need to depose the former president,” Justice Department attorneys wrote in a brief submitted to the court.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson largely agreed with the Justice Department but expressed frustration in her ruling that “the parties have done nothing more than wrangle over the order of the two depositions.”

She added, “However, in order to get the parties — who apparently still cannot agree on anything — over this impasse, it is hereby ordered that the deposition of Christopher Wray proceed first.”

The Supreme Court case is Robin Carnahan v. Carolyn Maloney et al., number 22-425, in the Supreme Court of the United States.

You can reach us at [email protected] and follow us on Facebook and Twitter

A+
a-
  • Donald Trump
  • Supreme Court
  • Trump hotel
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Supreme Court

    December 4, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Appear Divided Over Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy Deal

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court appeared divided on Monday over a bankruptcy deal struck by Purdue Pharma that would immunize... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court appeared divided on Monday over a bankruptcy deal struck by Purdue Pharma that would immunize the Sackler family, its one-time owners, from civil lawsuits for their role in the opioid crisis.  The closely watched case is considered to be among the most... Read More

    November 30, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Leans Toward Reducing Enforcement Authority of Federal Agencies

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court seemed ready Wednesday to cut back on the authority of federal agencies to enforce their... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court seemed ready Wednesday to cut back on the authority of federal agencies to enforce their regulations through fines or seizures of property. Questions from the conservative majority of justices during a hearing focused on whether the agencies were committing unconstitutional procedural... Read More

    November 30, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Chaos Reigns as Democrats Vote to Subpoena Crow, Leo in SCOTUS Probe

    WASHINGTON — A Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday became the latest venue for Capitol Hill dysfunction as Democrats on... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday became the latest venue for Capitol Hill dysfunction as Democrats on the panel approved issuing subpoenas to billionaire Harlan Crow and influential conservative Leonard Leo as part of an ongoing investigation into alleged ethical lapses by Supreme... Read More

    November 28, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Justices Asked to Parse Accelerated Sentencing Guidelines

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court returned to the bench for its December session on Monday, considering a pair of cases... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court returned to the bench for its December session on Monday, considering a pair of cases whose outcome could have sweeping consequences for the sentencing of recidivist offenders charged with federal crimes. The cases, which were consolidated for the sake of oral... Read More

    November 17, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Blocks Florida Law Banning Kids From Drag Shows

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a Florida law that bans child access to drag shows, saying... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a Florida law that bans child access to drag shows, saying it violates First Amendment free speech rights. Gov. Ron DeSantis and his supporters enacted the law to protect children from what they consider corrupt influences. The... Read More

    November 17, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Guns, Social Media and Fair Play for Whistleblowers Stand Out on Early Docket

    WASHINGTON — While “chaos” was the most apt description for certain parts of the federal government in October, the U.S.... Read More

    WASHINGTON — While “chaos” was the most apt description for certain parts of the federal government in October, the U.S. Supreme Court reconvened and got on with the business of unwinding the nation’s thorniest legal questions. By the time Congress finally chose Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La.,... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top